Cargando…

Weighing the Cost and Benefit of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Different Reading Subskills

Adults struggling with low reading skills are underserved by limited available treatments. While brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has the potential to improve a variety of cognitive functions, little work has been done examining its potential to tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younger, Jessica W., Randazzo Wagner, Melissa, Booth, James R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27375421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00262
_version_ 1782435733739405312
author Younger, Jessica W.
Randazzo Wagner, Melissa
Booth, James R.
author_facet Younger, Jessica W.
Randazzo Wagner, Melissa
Booth, James R.
author_sort Younger, Jessica W.
collection PubMed
description Adults struggling with low reading skills are underserved by limited available treatments. While brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has the potential to improve a variety of cognitive functions, little work has been done examining its potential to treat reading disabilities. Research on the effects of tDCS on reading abilities has been somewhat inconsistent perhaps in part due to discrepancies between studies in the nature of the tasks. In the current study, we examined the effect of tDCS to the left inferior parietal lobe (L IPL) on two reading tasks in low-to-average readers. We compared performance on a sight word efficiency (SWE) task and a rhyme judgment task before and after either stimulation to the L IPL, right superior parietal lobe (R SPL), or sham stimulation. Readers who received stimulation to the L IPL showed greater improvements on the SWE task, but less improvement on the rhyme judgment task compared to the R SPL and sham groups. This study demonstrates for the first time both a positive and negative effect of stimulation under the same stimulation parameters within the same participants. The results highlight the need to consider multiple tasks when assessing the potential of using tDCS as a treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4894873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48948732016-07-01 Weighing the Cost and Benefit of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Different Reading Subskills Younger, Jessica W. Randazzo Wagner, Melissa Booth, James R. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Adults struggling with low reading skills are underserved by limited available treatments. While brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has the potential to improve a variety of cognitive functions, little work has been done examining its potential to treat reading disabilities. Research on the effects of tDCS on reading abilities has been somewhat inconsistent perhaps in part due to discrepancies between studies in the nature of the tasks. In the current study, we examined the effect of tDCS to the left inferior parietal lobe (L IPL) on two reading tasks in low-to-average readers. We compared performance on a sight word efficiency (SWE) task and a rhyme judgment task before and after either stimulation to the L IPL, right superior parietal lobe (R SPL), or sham stimulation. Readers who received stimulation to the L IPL showed greater improvements on the SWE task, but less improvement on the rhyme judgment task compared to the R SPL and sham groups. This study demonstrates for the first time both a positive and negative effect of stimulation under the same stimulation parameters within the same participants. The results highlight the need to consider multiple tasks when assessing the potential of using tDCS as a treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4894873/ /pubmed/27375421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00262 Text en Copyright © 2016 Younger, Randazzo Wagner and Booth. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Younger, Jessica W.
Randazzo Wagner, Melissa
Booth, James R.
Weighing the Cost and Benefit of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Different Reading Subskills
title Weighing the Cost and Benefit of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Different Reading Subskills
title_full Weighing the Cost and Benefit of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Different Reading Subskills
title_fullStr Weighing the Cost and Benefit of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Different Reading Subskills
title_full_unstemmed Weighing the Cost and Benefit of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Different Reading Subskills
title_short Weighing the Cost and Benefit of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Different Reading Subskills
title_sort weighing the cost and benefit of transcranial direct current stimulation on different reading subskills
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27375421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00262
work_keys_str_mv AT youngerjessicaw weighingthecostandbenefitoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationondifferentreadingsubskills
AT randazzowagnermelissa weighingthecostandbenefitoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationondifferentreadingsubskills
AT boothjamesr weighingthecostandbenefitoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationondifferentreadingsubskills