Cargando…

Wireless Ambulatory Esophageal pH Monitoring in Dogs with Clinical Signs Interpreted as Gastroesophageal Reflux

BACKGROUND: Although gastroesophageal reflux (GER) often is assumed to be causative for upper gastrointestinal and respiratory signs in dogs, no attempts have been made to verify this assumption. OBJECTIVES: To monitor esophageal pH with the Bravo pH system in healthy dogs and client‐owned dogs disp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kook, P.H., Kempf, J., Ruetten, M., Reusch, C.E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4895632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25269696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12461
_version_ 1782435890171215872
author Kook, P.H.
Kempf, J.
Ruetten, M.
Reusch, C.E.
author_facet Kook, P.H.
Kempf, J.
Ruetten, M.
Reusch, C.E.
author_sort Kook, P.H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although gastroesophageal reflux (GER) often is assumed to be causative for upper gastrointestinal and respiratory signs in dogs, no attempts have been made to verify this assumption. OBJECTIVES: To monitor esophageal pH with the Bravo pH system in healthy dogs and client‐owned dogs displaying signs commonly attributed to GER. ANIMALS: Seven healthy and 22 client‐owned dogs. METHODS: After routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy, radiotelemetric pH capsules were placed in distal esophagus for continuous pH recording. Reflux was defined as single pH measurement <4. At discharge, owners were instructed to press individually predefined clinical sign‐buttons on the receiver whenever indicated. Results between groups were compared using Mann–Whitney U‐test. RESULTS: The median (range) number of refluxes in client‐owned and healthy dogs, respectively, was 17 (1–205) and 10 (1–65), the number of refluxes >5 minutes in duration was 1 (0–14), and 1 (0–4), duration of longest reflux (min) was 10 (0–65) and 8 (0–27), and fractional time pH <4 (%) was 0.76% (0.01–6.28), and 0.3% (0–3.1). No differences were found between groups. The median of 7 (1–35) clinical sign‐button pushes were recorded in 21 dogs. Median of 12.5% (2.8% [1/35]–50% [2/4]) reflux‐positive clinical sign‐button pushes was found in 10 dogs with reflux‐positive pushes. Five (22.7%) dogs had increased esophageal acid exposure, and mild esophagitis was noted in 1 dog. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Despite evidence of increased GER in some dogs, the clinical sign‐reflux association remained poor. Future investigation should focus on dogs with esophagitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4895632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48956322016-06-22 Wireless Ambulatory Esophageal pH Monitoring in Dogs with Clinical Signs Interpreted as Gastroesophageal Reflux Kook, P.H. Kempf, J. Ruetten, M. Reusch, C.E. J Vet Intern Med Standard Articles BACKGROUND: Although gastroesophageal reflux (GER) often is assumed to be causative for upper gastrointestinal and respiratory signs in dogs, no attempts have been made to verify this assumption. OBJECTIVES: To monitor esophageal pH with the Bravo pH system in healthy dogs and client‐owned dogs displaying signs commonly attributed to GER. ANIMALS: Seven healthy and 22 client‐owned dogs. METHODS: After routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy, radiotelemetric pH capsules were placed in distal esophagus for continuous pH recording. Reflux was defined as single pH measurement <4. At discharge, owners were instructed to press individually predefined clinical sign‐buttons on the receiver whenever indicated. Results between groups were compared using Mann–Whitney U‐test. RESULTS: The median (range) number of refluxes in client‐owned and healthy dogs, respectively, was 17 (1–205) and 10 (1–65), the number of refluxes >5 minutes in duration was 1 (0–14), and 1 (0–4), duration of longest reflux (min) was 10 (0–65) and 8 (0–27), and fractional time pH <4 (%) was 0.76% (0.01–6.28), and 0.3% (0–3.1). No differences were found between groups. The median of 7 (1–35) clinical sign‐button pushes were recorded in 21 dogs. Median of 12.5% (2.8% [1/35]–50% [2/4]) reflux‐positive clinical sign‐button pushes was found in 10 dogs with reflux‐positive pushes. Five (22.7%) dogs had increased esophageal acid exposure, and mild esophagitis was noted in 1 dog. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Despite evidence of increased GER in some dogs, the clinical sign‐reflux association remained poor. Future investigation should focus on dogs with esophagitis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-09-30 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4895632/ /pubmed/25269696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12461 Text en Copyright © 2014 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine
spellingShingle Standard Articles
Kook, P.H.
Kempf, J.
Ruetten, M.
Reusch, C.E.
Wireless Ambulatory Esophageal pH Monitoring in Dogs with Clinical Signs Interpreted as Gastroesophageal Reflux
title Wireless Ambulatory Esophageal pH Monitoring in Dogs with Clinical Signs Interpreted as Gastroesophageal Reflux
title_full Wireless Ambulatory Esophageal pH Monitoring in Dogs with Clinical Signs Interpreted as Gastroesophageal Reflux
title_fullStr Wireless Ambulatory Esophageal pH Monitoring in Dogs with Clinical Signs Interpreted as Gastroesophageal Reflux
title_full_unstemmed Wireless Ambulatory Esophageal pH Monitoring in Dogs with Clinical Signs Interpreted as Gastroesophageal Reflux
title_short Wireless Ambulatory Esophageal pH Monitoring in Dogs with Clinical Signs Interpreted as Gastroesophageal Reflux
title_sort wireless ambulatory esophageal ph monitoring in dogs with clinical signs interpreted as gastroesophageal reflux
topic Standard Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4895632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25269696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12461
work_keys_str_mv AT kookph wirelessambulatoryesophagealphmonitoringindogswithclinicalsignsinterpretedasgastroesophagealreflux
AT kempfj wirelessambulatoryesophagealphmonitoringindogswithclinicalsignsinterpretedasgastroesophagealreflux
AT ruettenm wirelessambulatoryesophagealphmonitoringindogswithclinicalsignsinterpretedasgastroesophagealreflux
AT reuschce wirelessambulatoryesophagealphmonitoringindogswithclinicalsignsinterpretedasgastroesophagealreflux