Cargando…
Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Advances in diagnostic modalities and improvement in surveillance programs for Barrett esophagus has resulted in an increase in the incidence of superficial esophageal cancers (SECs). SEC, due to their limited metastatic potential, are amenable to non-invasive treatment modalities. Endoscopic ultras...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4895939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949124 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.099 |
_version_ | 1782435952348626944 |
---|---|
author | Jain, Deepanshu Singhal, Shashideep |
author_facet | Jain, Deepanshu Singhal, Shashideep |
author_sort | Jain, Deepanshu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Advances in diagnostic modalities and improvement in surveillance programs for Barrett esophagus has resulted in an increase in the incidence of superficial esophageal cancers (SECs). SEC, due to their limited metastatic potential, are amenable to non-invasive treatment modalities. Endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are some of the new modalities that gastroenterologists have used over the last decade to diagnose and treat SEC. However, esophageal stricture (ES) is a very common complication and a major cause of morbidity post-ESD. In the past few years, there has been a tremendous effort to reduce the incidence of ES among patients undergoing ESD. Steroids have shown the most consistent results over time with minimal complications although the preferred mode of delivery is debatable, with both systemic and local therapy having pros and cons for specific subgroups of patients. Newer modalities such as esophageal stents, autologous cell sheet transplantation, polyglycolic acid, and tranilast have shown promising results but the depth of experience with these methods is still limited. We have summarized case reports, prospective single center studies, and randomized controlled trials describing the various methods intended to reduce the incidence of ES after ESD. Indications, techniques, outcomes, limitations, and reported complications are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4895939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48959392016-06-07 Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Jain, Deepanshu Singhal, Shashideep Clin Endosc Review Advances in diagnostic modalities and improvement in surveillance programs for Barrett esophagus has resulted in an increase in the incidence of superficial esophageal cancers (SECs). SEC, due to their limited metastatic potential, are amenable to non-invasive treatment modalities. Endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are some of the new modalities that gastroenterologists have used over the last decade to diagnose and treat SEC. However, esophageal stricture (ES) is a very common complication and a major cause of morbidity post-ESD. In the past few years, there has been a tremendous effort to reduce the incidence of ES among patients undergoing ESD. Steroids have shown the most consistent results over time with minimal complications although the preferred mode of delivery is debatable, with both systemic and local therapy having pros and cons for specific subgroups of patients. Newer modalities such as esophageal stents, autologous cell sheet transplantation, polyglycolic acid, and tranilast have shown promising results but the depth of experience with these methods is still limited. We have summarized case reports, prospective single center studies, and randomized controlled trials describing the various methods intended to reduce the incidence of ES after ESD. Indications, techniques, outcomes, limitations, and reported complications are discussed. The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016-05 2016-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4895939/ /pubmed/26949124 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.099 Text en Copyright © 2016 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Jain, Deepanshu Singhal, Shashideep Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection |
title | Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection |
title_full | Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection |
title_fullStr | Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection |
title_full_unstemmed | Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection |
title_short | Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection |
title_sort | esophageal stricture prevention after endoscopic submucosal dissection |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4895939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949124 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaindeepanshu esophagealstricturepreventionafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT singhalshashideep esophagealstricturepreventionafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection |