Cargando…

Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Advances in diagnostic modalities and improvement in surveillance programs for Barrett esophagus has resulted in an increase in the incidence of superficial esophageal cancers (SECs). SEC, due to their limited metastatic potential, are amenable to non-invasive treatment modalities. Endoscopic ultras...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Deepanshu, Singhal, Shashideep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4895939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949124
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.099
_version_ 1782435952348626944
author Jain, Deepanshu
Singhal, Shashideep
author_facet Jain, Deepanshu
Singhal, Shashideep
author_sort Jain, Deepanshu
collection PubMed
description Advances in diagnostic modalities and improvement in surveillance programs for Barrett esophagus has resulted in an increase in the incidence of superficial esophageal cancers (SECs). SEC, due to their limited metastatic potential, are amenable to non-invasive treatment modalities. Endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are some of the new modalities that gastroenterologists have used over the last decade to diagnose and treat SEC. However, esophageal stricture (ES) is a very common complication and a major cause of morbidity post-ESD. In the past few years, there has been a tremendous effort to reduce the incidence of ES among patients undergoing ESD. Steroids have shown the most consistent results over time with minimal complications although the preferred mode of delivery is debatable, with both systemic and local therapy having pros and cons for specific subgroups of patients. Newer modalities such as esophageal stents, autologous cell sheet transplantation, polyglycolic acid, and tranilast have shown promising results but the depth of experience with these methods is still limited. We have summarized case reports, prospective single center studies, and randomized controlled trials describing the various methods intended to reduce the incidence of ES after ESD. Indications, techniques, outcomes, limitations, and reported complications are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4895939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48959392016-06-07 Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Jain, Deepanshu Singhal, Shashideep Clin Endosc Review Advances in diagnostic modalities and improvement in surveillance programs for Barrett esophagus has resulted in an increase in the incidence of superficial esophageal cancers (SECs). SEC, due to their limited metastatic potential, are amenable to non-invasive treatment modalities. Endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are some of the new modalities that gastroenterologists have used over the last decade to diagnose and treat SEC. However, esophageal stricture (ES) is a very common complication and a major cause of morbidity post-ESD. In the past few years, there has been a tremendous effort to reduce the incidence of ES among patients undergoing ESD. Steroids have shown the most consistent results over time with minimal complications although the preferred mode of delivery is debatable, with both systemic and local therapy having pros and cons for specific subgroups of patients. Newer modalities such as esophageal stents, autologous cell sheet transplantation, polyglycolic acid, and tranilast have shown promising results but the depth of experience with these methods is still limited. We have summarized case reports, prospective single center studies, and randomized controlled trials describing the various methods intended to reduce the incidence of ES after ESD. Indications, techniques, outcomes, limitations, and reported complications are discussed. The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016-05 2016-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4895939/ /pubmed/26949124 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.099 Text en Copyright © 2016 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Jain, Deepanshu
Singhal, Shashideep
Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_full Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_fullStr Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_short Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_sort esophageal stricture prevention after endoscopic submucosal dissection
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4895939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949124
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.099
work_keys_str_mv AT jaindeepanshu esophagealstricturepreventionafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT singhalshashideep esophagealstricturepreventionafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection