Cargando…
Time to publication among completed diagnostic accuracy studies: associated with reported accuracy estimates
BACKGROUND: Previous evaluations have documented that studies evaluating the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions are not always reported, and that those with statistically significant results are published more rapidly than those without. This can lead to reporting bias in systematic reviews...
Autores principales: | Korevaar, Daniël A., van Es, Nick, Zwinderman, Aeilko H., Cohen, Jérémie F., Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4896017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27267602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0177-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Targeted test evaluation: a framework for designing diagnostic accuracy studies with clear study hypotheses
por: Korevaar, Daniël A., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Statistical models for quantifying diagnostic accuracy with multiple lesions per patient
por: Zwinderman, Aeilko H., et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy
por: Korevaar, Daniël A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts: a new addition to the toolbox for test accuracy research
por: Korevaar, Daniël A., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration
por: Cohen, Jérémie F, et al.
Publicado: (2016)