Cargando…

Evaluation of custom multiplex real - time RT - PCR in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory infections in children can be fatal, rapid identification of the causative agent and timely treatment can be life saving. Multiplex real time RT-PCR helps in simultaneous detection of multiple viruses saving cost, time and labour. Commercially available multiplex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malhotra, Bharti, Swamy, M. Anjaneya, Reddy, P. V. Janardhan, Kumar, Neeraj, Tiwari, Jitendra Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4896093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27267595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-016-0549-8
_version_ 1782435979324293120
author Malhotra, Bharti
Swamy, M. Anjaneya
Reddy, P. V. Janardhan
Kumar, Neeraj
Tiwari, Jitendra Kumar
author_facet Malhotra, Bharti
Swamy, M. Anjaneya
Reddy, P. V. Janardhan
Kumar, Neeraj
Tiwari, Jitendra Kumar
author_sort Malhotra, Bharti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory infections in children can be fatal, rapid identification of the causative agent and timely treatment can be life saving. Multiplex real time RT-PCR helps in simultaneous detection of multiple viruses saving cost, time and labour. Commercially available multiplex real time RT-PCR kits are very expensive. Therefore the aim of the present study was to develop a cost effective multiplex real time RT-PCR for the detection of 18 respiratory viruses and compare it with an in-vitro diagnostics approved Fast Track Diagnostic Respiratory Pathogens 21 Kit (FTD). METHODS: Nasopharyngeal aspirates and throat swabs were collected and processed for extraction of nucleic acid using an automated extraction system and multiplex real time RT-PCR was performed using the FTD kit and a custom assay on 356 samples. RESULTS: Custom and FTD assays detected one or more respiratory viruses in 268 (75.29 %) and 262 (73.60 %) samples respectively. The concordance between the custom assay and the FTD assay was 100 % for HCoV OC43, HCoV 229E, HPIV-1, HPIV-2, HBoV, HPeV, Flu A, and Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and 94.66 – 99.71 % for the remaining viruses; Flu B (99.71 %), HRV (99.71 %), HPIV-3 (98.87 %), HPIV-4 (99.43 %), HCoV NL63 (99.71 %), HMPV A/B (99.71 %), RSV A/B (94.66 %), EV (98.31 %), HCoV HKU1 (99.71 %), HAdV (99.71 %). Major discrepancy was observed for RSV A/B, which was over detected in 18 samples by the custom assay as compared to the FTD assay. The custom assay was much cheaper than the FTD assay and the time taken was only 29 min more. CONCLUSION: The custom primer and probe mix was found to be comparable to the FTD assay with good concordance but was much cheaper and the time taken for reporting was only 29 min more. The low cost custom multiplex RT-PCR can be a useful alternative to the costly FTD kit for rapid identification of viral aetiology in resource limited settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4896093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48960932016-06-08 Evaluation of custom multiplex real - time RT - PCR in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses Malhotra, Bharti Swamy, M. Anjaneya Reddy, P. V. Janardhan Kumar, Neeraj Tiwari, Jitendra Kumar Virol J Research BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory infections in children can be fatal, rapid identification of the causative agent and timely treatment can be life saving. Multiplex real time RT-PCR helps in simultaneous detection of multiple viruses saving cost, time and labour. Commercially available multiplex real time RT-PCR kits are very expensive. Therefore the aim of the present study was to develop a cost effective multiplex real time RT-PCR for the detection of 18 respiratory viruses and compare it with an in-vitro diagnostics approved Fast Track Diagnostic Respiratory Pathogens 21 Kit (FTD). METHODS: Nasopharyngeal aspirates and throat swabs were collected and processed for extraction of nucleic acid using an automated extraction system and multiplex real time RT-PCR was performed using the FTD kit and a custom assay on 356 samples. RESULTS: Custom and FTD assays detected one or more respiratory viruses in 268 (75.29 %) and 262 (73.60 %) samples respectively. The concordance between the custom assay and the FTD assay was 100 % for HCoV OC43, HCoV 229E, HPIV-1, HPIV-2, HBoV, HPeV, Flu A, and Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and 94.66 – 99.71 % for the remaining viruses; Flu B (99.71 %), HRV (99.71 %), HPIV-3 (98.87 %), HPIV-4 (99.43 %), HCoV NL63 (99.71 %), HMPV A/B (99.71 %), RSV A/B (94.66 %), EV (98.31 %), HCoV HKU1 (99.71 %), HAdV (99.71 %). Major discrepancy was observed for RSV A/B, which was over detected in 18 samples by the custom assay as compared to the FTD assay. The custom assay was much cheaper than the FTD assay and the time taken was only 29 min more. CONCLUSION: The custom primer and probe mix was found to be comparable to the FTD assay with good concordance but was much cheaper and the time taken for reporting was only 29 min more. The low cost custom multiplex RT-PCR can be a useful alternative to the costly FTD kit for rapid identification of viral aetiology in resource limited settings. BioMed Central 2016-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4896093/ /pubmed/27267595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-016-0549-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Malhotra, Bharti
Swamy, M. Anjaneya
Reddy, P. V. Janardhan
Kumar, Neeraj
Tiwari, Jitendra Kumar
Evaluation of custom multiplex real - time RT - PCR in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses
title Evaluation of custom multiplex real - time RT - PCR in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses
title_full Evaluation of custom multiplex real - time RT - PCR in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses
title_fullStr Evaluation of custom multiplex real - time RT - PCR in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of custom multiplex real - time RT - PCR in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses
title_short Evaluation of custom multiplex real - time RT - PCR in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses
title_sort evaluation of custom multiplex real - time rt - pcr in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4896093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27267595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-016-0549-8
work_keys_str_mv AT malhotrabharti evaluationofcustommultiplexrealtimertpcrincomparisontofasttrackdiagnosticsrespiratory21pathogenskitfordetectionofmultiplerespiratoryviruses
AT swamymanjaneya evaluationofcustommultiplexrealtimertpcrincomparisontofasttrackdiagnosticsrespiratory21pathogenskitfordetectionofmultiplerespiratoryviruses
AT reddypvjanardhan evaluationofcustommultiplexrealtimertpcrincomparisontofasttrackdiagnosticsrespiratory21pathogenskitfordetectionofmultiplerespiratoryviruses
AT kumarneeraj evaluationofcustommultiplexrealtimertpcrincomparisontofasttrackdiagnosticsrespiratory21pathogenskitfordetectionofmultiplerespiratoryviruses
AT tiwarijitendrakumar evaluationofcustommultiplexrealtimertpcrincomparisontofasttrackdiagnosticsrespiratory21pathogenskitfordetectionofmultiplerespiratoryviruses