Cargando…

Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a finishing protocol implemented in patients treated in the Orthodontics graduate program at Universidad de Antioquia. Evaluation was carried out by means of the criteria set by the Objective Grading System (OGS) of the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO). METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carvajal-Flórez, Alvaro, Barbosa-Lis, Diana María, Zapata-Noreña, Oscar Arturo, Marín-Velásquez, Julissa Andrea, Afanador-Bayona, Sergio Andrés
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4896287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27275620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.088-094.oar
_version_ 1782436005066833920
author Carvajal-Flórez, Alvaro
Barbosa-Lis, Diana María
Zapata-Noreña, Oscar Arturo
Marín-Velásquez, Julissa Andrea
Afanador-Bayona, Sergio Andrés
author_facet Carvajal-Flórez, Alvaro
Barbosa-Lis, Diana María
Zapata-Noreña, Oscar Arturo
Marín-Velásquez, Julissa Andrea
Afanador-Bayona, Sergio Andrés
author_sort Carvajal-Flórez, Alvaro
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a finishing protocol implemented in patients treated in the Orthodontics graduate program at Universidad de Antioquia. Evaluation was carried out by means of the criteria set by the Objective Grading System (OGS) of the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO). METHODS: Cast models and panoramic radiographs of 34 patients were evaluated. The intervention group (IG) consisted of 17 patients (19.88 ± 4.4 years old) treated under a finishing protocol. This protocol included training in finishing, application of a finishing guide, brackets repositioning and patient's follow-up. Results of the IG were compared to a control group of 17 patients (21.88 ± 7.0 years old) selected by stratified randomization without finishing intervention (CG). RESULTS: The scores for both CG and IG were 38.00 ± 9.0 and 31.41 ± 9.6 (p = 0.048), respectively. The score improved significantly in the IG group, mainly regarding marginal ridges (CG: 5.59 ± 2.2; IG: 3.65 ± 1.8) (p = 0.009) and root angulation (CG: 7.59 ± 2.8; IG: 4.88 ± 2.6) (p = 0.007). Criteria that did not improve, but had the highest scores were: alignment (CG: 6.35 ± 2.7; IG: 6.82 ± 2.8) (p = 0.62) and buccolingual inclination (CG: 3.6 ± 5.88; IG: 5.29 ± 3.9) (p = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Standardization and implementation of a finishing protocol contributed to improve clinical performance in the Orthodontics graduate program, as expressed by occlusal outcomes. Greater emphasis should be given on the finishing phase to achieve lower scores in the ABO grading system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4896287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48962872016-06-14 Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol Carvajal-Flórez, Alvaro Barbosa-Lis, Diana María Zapata-Noreña, Oscar Arturo Marín-Velásquez, Julissa Andrea Afanador-Bayona, Sergio Andrés Dental Press J Orthod Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a finishing protocol implemented in patients treated in the Orthodontics graduate program at Universidad de Antioquia. Evaluation was carried out by means of the criteria set by the Objective Grading System (OGS) of the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO). METHODS: Cast models and panoramic radiographs of 34 patients were evaluated. The intervention group (IG) consisted of 17 patients (19.88 ± 4.4 years old) treated under a finishing protocol. This protocol included training in finishing, application of a finishing guide, brackets repositioning and patient's follow-up. Results of the IG were compared to a control group of 17 patients (21.88 ± 7.0 years old) selected by stratified randomization without finishing intervention (CG). RESULTS: The scores for both CG and IG were 38.00 ± 9.0 and 31.41 ± 9.6 (p = 0.048), respectively. The score improved significantly in the IG group, mainly regarding marginal ridges (CG: 5.59 ± 2.2; IG: 3.65 ± 1.8) (p = 0.009) and root angulation (CG: 7.59 ± 2.8; IG: 4.88 ± 2.6) (p = 0.007). Criteria that did not improve, but had the highest scores were: alignment (CG: 6.35 ± 2.7; IG: 6.82 ± 2.8) (p = 0.62) and buccolingual inclination (CG: 3.6 ± 5.88; IG: 5.29 ± 3.9) (p = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Standardization and implementation of a finishing protocol contributed to improve clinical performance in the Orthodontics graduate program, as expressed by occlusal outcomes. Greater emphasis should be given on the finishing phase to achieve lower scores in the ABO grading system. Dental Press International 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4896287/ /pubmed/27275620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.088-094.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Articles
Carvajal-Flórez, Alvaro
Barbosa-Lis, Diana María
Zapata-Noreña, Oscar Arturo
Marín-Velásquez, Julissa Andrea
Afanador-Bayona, Sergio Andrés
Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
title Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
title_full Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
title_fullStr Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
title_full_unstemmed Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
title_short Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
title_sort orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4896287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27275620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.088-094.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT carvajalflorezalvaro orthodontictreatmentoutcomesobtainedbyapplicationofafinishingprotocol
AT barbosalisdianamaria orthodontictreatmentoutcomesobtainedbyapplicationofafinishingprotocol
AT zapatanorenaoscararturo orthodontictreatmentoutcomesobtainedbyapplicationofafinishingprotocol
AT marinvelasquezjulissaandrea orthodontictreatmentoutcomesobtainedbyapplicationofafinishingprotocol
AT afanadorbayonasergioandres orthodontictreatmentoutcomesobtainedbyapplicationofafinishingprotocol