Cargando…
Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a finishing protocol implemented in patients treated in the Orthodontics graduate program at Universidad de Antioquia. Evaluation was carried out by means of the criteria set by the Objective Grading System (OGS) of the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO). METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4896287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27275620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.088-094.oar |
_version_ | 1782436005066833920 |
---|---|
author | Carvajal-Flórez, Alvaro Barbosa-Lis, Diana María Zapata-Noreña, Oscar Arturo Marín-Velásquez, Julissa Andrea Afanador-Bayona, Sergio Andrés |
author_facet | Carvajal-Flórez, Alvaro Barbosa-Lis, Diana María Zapata-Noreña, Oscar Arturo Marín-Velásquez, Julissa Andrea Afanador-Bayona, Sergio Andrés |
author_sort | Carvajal-Flórez, Alvaro |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a finishing protocol implemented in patients treated in the Orthodontics graduate program at Universidad de Antioquia. Evaluation was carried out by means of the criteria set by the Objective Grading System (OGS) of the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO). METHODS: Cast models and panoramic radiographs of 34 patients were evaluated. The intervention group (IG) consisted of 17 patients (19.88 ± 4.4 years old) treated under a finishing protocol. This protocol included training in finishing, application of a finishing guide, brackets repositioning and patient's follow-up. Results of the IG were compared to a control group of 17 patients (21.88 ± 7.0 years old) selected by stratified randomization without finishing intervention (CG). RESULTS: The scores for both CG and IG were 38.00 ± 9.0 and 31.41 ± 9.6 (p = 0.048), respectively. The score improved significantly in the IG group, mainly regarding marginal ridges (CG: 5.59 ± 2.2; IG: 3.65 ± 1.8) (p = 0.009) and root angulation (CG: 7.59 ± 2.8; IG: 4.88 ± 2.6) (p = 0.007). Criteria that did not improve, but had the highest scores were: alignment (CG: 6.35 ± 2.7; IG: 6.82 ± 2.8) (p = 0.62) and buccolingual inclination (CG: 3.6 ± 5.88; IG: 5.29 ± 3.9) (p = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Standardization and implementation of a finishing protocol contributed to improve clinical performance in the Orthodontics graduate program, as expressed by occlusal outcomes. Greater emphasis should be given on the finishing phase to achieve lower scores in the ABO grading system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4896287 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48962872016-06-14 Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol Carvajal-Flórez, Alvaro Barbosa-Lis, Diana María Zapata-Noreña, Oscar Arturo Marín-Velásquez, Julissa Andrea Afanador-Bayona, Sergio Andrés Dental Press J Orthod Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a finishing protocol implemented in patients treated in the Orthodontics graduate program at Universidad de Antioquia. Evaluation was carried out by means of the criteria set by the Objective Grading System (OGS) of the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO). METHODS: Cast models and panoramic radiographs of 34 patients were evaluated. The intervention group (IG) consisted of 17 patients (19.88 ± 4.4 years old) treated under a finishing protocol. This protocol included training in finishing, application of a finishing guide, brackets repositioning and patient's follow-up. Results of the IG were compared to a control group of 17 patients (21.88 ± 7.0 years old) selected by stratified randomization without finishing intervention (CG). RESULTS: The scores for both CG and IG were 38.00 ± 9.0 and 31.41 ± 9.6 (p = 0.048), respectively. The score improved significantly in the IG group, mainly regarding marginal ridges (CG: 5.59 ± 2.2; IG: 3.65 ± 1.8) (p = 0.009) and root angulation (CG: 7.59 ± 2.8; IG: 4.88 ± 2.6) (p = 0.007). Criteria that did not improve, but had the highest scores were: alignment (CG: 6.35 ± 2.7; IG: 6.82 ± 2.8) (p = 0.62) and buccolingual inclination (CG: 3.6 ± 5.88; IG: 5.29 ± 3.9) (p = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Standardization and implementation of a finishing protocol contributed to improve clinical performance in the Orthodontics graduate program, as expressed by occlusal outcomes. Greater emphasis should be given on the finishing phase to achieve lower scores in the ABO grading system. Dental Press International 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4896287/ /pubmed/27275620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.088-094.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Articles Carvajal-Flórez, Alvaro Barbosa-Lis, Diana María Zapata-Noreña, Oscar Arturo Marín-Velásquez, Julissa Andrea Afanador-Bayona, Sergio Andrés Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol |
title | Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing
protocol |
title_full | Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing
protocol |
title_fullStr | Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing
protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing
protocol |
title_short | Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing
protocol |
title_sort | orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing
protocol |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4896287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27275620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.088-094.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carvajalflorezalvaro orthodontictreatmentoutcomesobtainedbyapplicationofafinishingprotocol AT barbosalisdianamaria orthodontictreatmentoutcomesobtainedbyapplicationofafinishingprotocol AT zapatanorenaoscararturo orthodontictreatmentoutcomesobtainedbyapplicationofafinishingprotocol AT marinvelasquezjulissaandrea orthodontictreatmentoutcomesobtainedbyapplicationofafinishingprotocol AT afanadorbayonasergioandres orthodontictreatmentoutcomesobtainedbyapplicationofafinishingprotocol |