Cargando…
The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Aortic valve disease is the most common form of heart valve disease in developed countries. Imaging remains central to the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with both aortic stenosis and regurgitation and has traditionally been performed with echocardiography. Indeed,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4896976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27375833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12410-016-9383-z |
_version_ | 1782436059406139392 |
---|---|
author | Everett, Russell J. Newby, David E. Jabbour, Andrew Fayad, Zahi A. Dweck, Marc R. |
author_facet | Everett, Russell J. Newby, David E. Jabbour, Andrew Fayad, Zahi A. Dweck, Marc R. |
author_sort | Everett, Russell J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Aortic valve disease is the most common form of heart valve disease in developed countries. Imaging remains central to the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with both aortic stenosis and regurgitation and has traditionally been performed with echocardiography. Indeed, echocardiography remains the cornerstone of aortic valve imaging as it is cheap, widely available and provides critical information concerning valve hemodynamics and ventricular function. RECENT FINDINGS: Whilst diagnostic in the vast majority of patients, echocardiography has certain limitations including operator variability, potential for measurement errors and internal inconsistencies in severity grading. In particular, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis is common and challenging to diagnose. Aortic valve imaging may therefore be improved with alternative and complimentary multimodality approaches. SUMMARY: This review investigates established and novel techniques for imaging both the aortic valve and the myocardial remodelling response including echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. Moreover, we examine how the complementary information provided by each modality may be used in both future clinical practice and the research arena. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4896976 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48969762016-06-30 The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease Everett, Russell J. Newby, David E. Jabbour, Andrew Fayad, Zahi A. Dweck, Marc R. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (V Puntmann and E Nagel) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Aortic valve disease is the most common form of heart valve disease in developed countries. Imaging remains central to the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with both aortic stenosis and regurgitation and has traditionally been performed with echocardiography. Indeed, echocardiography remains the cornerstone of aortic valve imaging as it is cheap, widely available and provides critical information concerning valve hemodynamics and ventricular function. RECENT FINDINGS: Whilst diagnostic in the vast majority of patients, echocardiography has certain limitations including operator variability, potential for measurement errors and internal inconsistencies in severity grading. In particular, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis is common and challenging to diagnose. Aortic valve imaging may therefore be improved with alternative and complimentary multimodality approaches. SUMMARY: This review investigates established and novel techniques for imaging both the aortic valve and the myocardial remodelling response including echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. Moreover, we examine how the complementary information provided by each modality may be used in both future clinical practice and the research arena. Springer US 2016-06-07 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4896976/ /pubmed/27375833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12410-016-9383-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (V Puntmann and E Nagel) Everett, Russell J. Newby, David E. Jabbour, Andrew Fayad, Zahi A. Dweck, Marc R. The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease |
title | The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease |
title_full | The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease |
title_fullStr | The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease |
title_short | The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease |
title_sort | role of imaging in aortic valve disease |
topic | Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (V Puntmann and E Nagel) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4896976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27375833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12410-016-9383-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT everettrussellj theroleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease AT newbydavide theroleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease AT jabbourandrew theroleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease AT fayadzahia theroleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease AT dweckmarcr theroleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease AT everettrussellj roleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease AT newbydavide roleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease AT jabbourandrew roleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease AT fayadzahia roleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease AT dweckmarcr roleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease |