Cargando…

The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Aortic valve disease is the most common form of heart valve disease in developed countries. Imaging remains central to the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with both aortic stenosis and regurgitation and has traditionally been performed with echocardiography. Indeed,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Everett, Russell J., Newby, David E., Jabbour, Andrew, Fayad, Zahi A., Dweck, Marc R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4896976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27375833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12410-016-9383-z
_version_ 1782436059406139392
author Everett, Russell J.
Newby, David E.
Jabbour, Andrew
Fayad, Zahi A.
Dweck, Marc R.
author_facet Everett, Russell J.
Newby, David E.
Jabbour, Andrew
Fayad, Zahi A.
Dweck, Marc R.
author_sort Everett, Russell J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Aortic valve disease is the most common form of heart valve disease in developed countries. Imaging remains central to the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with both aortic stenosis and regurgitation and has traditionally been performed with echocardiography. Indeed, echocardiography remains the cornerstone of aortic valve imaging as it is cheap, widely available and provides critical information concerning valve hemodynamics and ventricular function. RECENT FINDINGS: Whilst diagnostic in the vast majority of patients, echocardiography has certain limitations including operator variability, potential for measurement errors and internal inconsistencies in severity grading. In particular, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis is common and challenging to diagnose. Aortic valve imaging may therefore be improved with alternative and complimentary multimodality approaches. SUMMARY: This review investigates established and novel techniques for imaging both the aortic valve and the myocardial remodelling response including echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. Moreover, we examine how the complementary information provided by each modality may be used in both future clinical practice and the research arena.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4896976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48969762016-06-30 The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease Everett, Russell J. Newby, David E. Jabbour, Andrew Fayad, Zahi A. Dweck, Marc R. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (V Puntmann and E Nagel) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Aortic valve disease is the most common form of heart valve disease in developed countries. Imaging remains central to the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with both aortic stenosis and regurgitation and has traditionally been performed with echocardiography. Indeed, echocardiography remains the cornerstone of aortic valve imaging as it is cheap, widely available and provides critical information concerning valve hemodynamics and ventricular function. RECENT FINDINGS: Whilst diagnostic in the vast majority of patients, echocardiography has certain limitations including operator variability, potential for measurement errors and internal inconsistencies in severity grading. In particular, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis is common and challenging to diagnose. Aortic valve imaging may therefore be improved with alternative and complimentary multimodality approaches. SUMMARY: This review investigates established and novel techniques for imaging both the aortic valve and the myocardial remodelling response including echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. Moreover, we examine how the complementary information provided by each modality may be used in both future clinical practice and the research arena. Springer US 2016-06-07 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4896976/ /pubmed/27375833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12410-016-9383-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (V Puntmann and E Nagel)
Everett, Russell J.
Newby, David E.
Jabbour, Andrew
Fayad, Zahi A.
Dweck, Marc R.
The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease
title The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease
title_full The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease
title_fullStr The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease
title_short The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease
title_sort role of imaging in aortic valve disease
topic Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (V Puntmann and E Nagel)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4896976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27375833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12410-016-9383-z
work_keys_str_mv AT everettrussellj theroleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease
AT newbydavide theroleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease
AT jabbourandrew theroleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease
AT fayadzahia theroleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease
AT dweckmarcr theroleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease
AT everettrussellj roleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease
AT newbydavide roleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease
AT jabbourandrew roleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease
AT fayadzahia roleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease
AT dweckmarcr roleofimaginginaorticvalvedisease