Cargando…
Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion
Background. This retrospective, two cohort series study was designed to compare a room temperature, glycerol-preserved composite pinned bone allograft (G-CPBA) with the same graft type provided in a frozen state (F-CPBA) for use as a cervical interbody spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/960142 |
_version_ | 1782436117797142528 |
---|---|
author | Rodway, Ian Gander, Julie |
author_facet | Rodway, Ian Gander, Julie |
author_sort | Rodway, Ian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. This retrospective, two cohort series study was designed to compare a room temperature, glycerol-preserved composite pinned bone allograft (G-CPBA) with the same graft type provided in a frozen state (F-CPBA) for use as a cervical interbody spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods. A comprehensive chart review was performed for 67 sequential patients that received either a F-CPBA or a G-CPBA and had at least one-year follow-up. Twenty-eight patients had received G-CPBA grafts and 37 patients had received F-CPBA grafts. Two additional 2-level patients had received one of each type of grafts. Results. At 3 months, 45.3% (29 of 64) of glycerol-preserved and 41.4% (29 of 70) of frozen allografts, respectively, were considered to be fused radiographically. At 12 months, 100% of both treatment groups (41 glycerol-preserved and 45 frozen) were considered fused. Fusion rates for G-CPBA were statistically similar to F-CPBA at both 3 and 12 months (P = 0.6535 and >0.999, resp.). There were no allograft related complications in either treatment group. Conclusions. 100% fusion rates were attained by both treatment groups at 12 months and were similar at short-term follow-up for all comparable levels. Level of Evidence. Level of evidence is III. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4897249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48972492016-07-05 Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion Rodway, Ian Gander, Julie Int Sch Res Notices Clinical Study Background. This retrospective, two cohort series study was designed to compare a room temperature, glycerol-preserved composite pinned bone allograft (G-CPBA) with the same graft type provided in a frozen state (F-CPBA) for use as a cervical interbody spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods. A comprehensive chart review was performed for 67 sequential patients that received either a F-CPBA or a G-CPBA and had at least one-year follow-up. Twenty-eight patients had received G-CPBA grafts and 37 patients had received F-CPBA grafts. Two additional 2-level patients had received one of each type of grafts. Results. At 3 months, 45.3% (29 of 64) of glycerol-preserved and 41.4% (29 of 70) of frozen allografts, respectively, were considered to be fused radiographically. At 12 months, 100% of both treatment groups (41 glycerol-preserved and 45 frozen) were considered fused. Fusion rates for G-CPBA were statistically similar to F-CPBA at both 3 and 12 months (P = 0.6535 and >0.999, resp.). There were no allograft related complications in either treatment group. Conclusions. 100% fusion rates were attained by both treatment groups at 12 months and were similar at short-term follow-up for all comparable levels. Level of Evidence. Level of evidence is III. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4897249/ /pubmed/27382618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/960142 Text en Copyright © 2014 I. Rodway and J. Gander. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Rodway, Ian Gander, Julie Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion |
title | Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion |
title_full | Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion |
title_short | Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion |
title_sort | comparison of fusion rates between glycerol-preserved and frozen composite allografts in cervical fusion |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/960142 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodwayian comparisonoffusionratesbetweenglycerolpreservedandfrozencompositeallograftsincervicalfusion AT ganderjulie comparisonoffusionratesbetweenglycerolpreservedandfrozencompositeallograftsincervicalfusion |