Cargando…

Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion

Background. This retrospective, two cohort series study was designed to compare a room temperature, glycerol-preserved composite pinned bone allograft (G-CPBA) with the same graft type provided in a frozen state (F-CPBA) for use as a cervical interbody spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodway, Ian, Gander, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/960142
_version_ 1782436117797142528
author Rodway, Ian
Gander, Julie
author_facet Rodway, Ian
Gander, Julie
author_sort Rodway, Ian
collection PubMed
description Background. This retrospective, two cohort series study was designed to compare a room temperature, glycerol-preserved composite pinned bone allograft (G-CPBA) with the same graft type provided in a frozen state (F-CPBA) for use as a cervical interbody spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods. A comprehensive chart review was performed for 67 sequential patients that received either a F-CPBA or a G-CPBA and had at least one-year follow-up. Twenty-eight patients had received G-CPBA grafts and 37 patients had received F-CPBA grafts. Two additional 2-level patients had received one of each type of grafts. Results. At 3 months, 45.3% (29 of 64) of glycerol-preserved and 41.4% (29 of 70) of frozen allografts, respectively, were considered to be fused radiographically. At 12 months, 100% of both treatment groups (41 glycerol-preserved and 45 frozen) were considered fused. Fusion rates for G-CPBA were statistically similar to F-CPBA at both 3 and 12 months (P = 0.6535 and >0.999, resp.). There were no allograft related complications in either treatment group. Conclusions. 100% fusion rates were attained by both treatment groups at 12 months and were similar at short-term follow-up for all comparable levels. Level of Evidence. Level of evidence is III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4897249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48972492016-07-05 Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion Rodway, Ian Gander, Julie Int Sch Res Notices Clinical Study Background. This retrospective, two cohort series study was designed to compare a room temperature, glycerol-preserved composite pinned bone allograft (G-CPBA) with the same graft type provided in a frozen state (F-CPBA) for use as a cervical interbody spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods. A comprehensive chart review was performed for 67 sequential patients that received either a F-CPBA or a G-CPBA and had at least one-year follow-up. Twenty-eight patients had received G-CPBA grafts and 37 patients had received F-CPBA grafts. Two additional 2-level patients had received one of each type of grafts. Results. At 3 months, 45.3% (29 of 64) of glycerol-preserved and 41.4% (29 of 70) of frozen allografts, respectively, were considered to be fused radiographically. At 12 months, 100% of both treatment groups (41 glycerol-preserved and 45 frozen) were considered fused. Fusion rates for G-CPBA were statistically similar to F-CPBA at both 3 and 12 months (P = 0.6535 and >0.999, resp.). There were no allograft related complications in either treatment group. Conclusions. 100% fusion rates were attained by both treatment groups at 12 months and were similar at short-term follow-up for all comparable levels. Level of Evidence. Level of evidence is III. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4897249/ /pubmed/27382618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/960142 Text en Copyright © 2014 I. Rodway and J. Gander. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Rodway, Ian
Gander, Julie
Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion
title Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion
title_full Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion
title_fullStr Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion
title_short Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion
title_sort comparison of fusion rates between glycerol-preserved and frozen composite allografts in cervical fusion
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/960142
work_keys_str_mv AT rodwayian comparisonoffusionratesbetweenglycerolpreservedandfrozencompositeallograftsincervicalfusion
AT ganderjulie comparisonoffusionratesbetweenglycerolpreservedandfrozencompositeallograftsincervicalfusion