Cargando…
Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal
As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepte...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1346026 |
_version_ | 1782436148041220096 |
---|---|
author | Johansen, Mathilde Thomsen, Simon Francis |
author_facet | Johansen, Mathilde Thomsen, Simon Francis |
author_sort | Johansen, Mathilde |
collection | PubMed |
description | As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4897386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48973862016-07-05 Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal Johansen, Mathilde Thomsen, Simon Francis Int Sch Res Notices Review Article As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4897386/ /pubmed/27382637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1346026 Text en Copyright © 2016 M. Johansen and S. F. Thomsen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Johansen, Mathilde Thomsen, Simon Francis Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal |
title | Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal |
title_full | Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal |
title_fullStr | Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal |
title_full_unstemmed | Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal |
title_short | Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal |
title_sort | guidelines for reporting medical research: a critical appraisal |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1346026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johansenmathilde guidelinesforreportingmedicalresearchacriticalappraisal AT thomsensimonfrancis guidelinesforreportingmedicalresearchacriticalappraisal |