Cargando…

Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal

As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johansen, Mathilde, Thomsen, Simon Francis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1346026
_version_ 1782436148041220096
author Johansen, Mathilde
Thomsen, Simon Francis
author_facet Johansen, Mathilde
Thomsen, Simon Francis
author_sort Johansen, Mathilde
collection PubMed
description As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4897386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48973862016-07-05 Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal Johansen, Mathilde Thomsen, Simon Francis Int Sch Res Notices Review Article As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4897386/ /pubmed/27382637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1346026 Text en Copyright © 2016 M. Johansen and S. F. Thomsen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Johansen, Mathilde
Thomsen, Simon Francis
Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal
title Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal
title_full Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal
title_fullStr Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal
title_full_unstemmed Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal
title_short Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal
title_sort guidelines for reporting medical research: a critical appraisal
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1346026
work_keys_str_mv AT johansenmathilde guidelinesforreportingmedicalresearchacriticalappraisal
AT thomsensimonfrancis guidelinesforreportingmedicalresearchacriticalappraisal