Cargando…
Response of Yield and Yield Components of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] to Tillage, Nutrient, and Weed Management Practices in Dura Area, Northern Ethiopia
The low average grain yield (0.7 ton ha(−1)) of tef in Ethiopia is mainly attributed to low soil fertility, and inappropriate tillage and weeds control practices. Despite this, limited scientific information has been documented so far on their interaction effects on tef crop productivity in northern...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27379271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/439718 |
_version_ | 1782436150515859456 |
---|---|
author | Tesfahunegn, Gebreyesus Brhane |
author_facet | Tesfahunegn, Gebreyesus Brhane |
author_sort | Tesfahunegn, Gebreyesus Brhane |
collection | PubMed |
description | The low average grain yield (0.7 ton ha(−1)) of tef in Ethiopia is mainly attributed to low soil fertility, and inappropriate tillage and weeds control practices. Despite this, limited scientific information has been documented so far on their interaction effects on tef crop productivity in northern Ethiopia. The objective of this study was to assess the separate and interaction effects of tillage, fertilizer, and weed control practices on tef yield and yield components in the conditions of northern Ethiopia. A two-year study (2008-2009) was conducted using split-split-plot design with three replications. In the main plot, three tillage treatments: conventional tillage (6 times tillage passes) (T1), four times tillage passes (T2), and reduced tillage (single tillage pass at sowing) (T3) were applied. The fertilizer treatments in the subplots were: no fertilizer (F1); 23 kg N ha(−1) (F2); 23 kg N ha(−1) and 10 kg P ha(−1) (F3); 23 kg N ha(−1) and 2.5 ton manure ha(−1) (F4); and 2.5 ton manure ha(−1) (F5). The sub-subplot weed control treatments included farmer weed control practice or hand weeding (W1); 2,4 D at 0.75 kg ha(−1) at five-leaf stage; 2,4 D at 0.75 kg ha(−1) at six-leaf stage; 2,4 D at 1.5 kg ha(−1) at five-leaf stage; and 2,4 D at 1.5 kg ha(−1) at six-leaf stage. This study showed that the separate and interaction effects of tillage, fertilizer, and weed control practices significantly affected tef crop yield and yield components in both crop seasons. T2 increased tef yield by >42% over the other tillage and F3 increased yield by >21% over the other fertilizer treatments. Grain yield increased by >23% due to W1. This study thus suggested that promising treatments such as T2, F3, and W1 should be demonstrated at on-farm fields in order to evaluate their performance at farmers' conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4897397 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48973972016-07-04 Response of Yield and Yield Components of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] to Tillage, Nutrient, and Weed Management Practices in Dura Area, Northern Ethiopia Tesfahunegn, Gebreyesus Brhane Int Sch Res Notices Research Article The low average grain yield (0.7 ton ha(−1)) of tef in Ethiopia is mainly attributed to low soil fertility, and inappropriate tillage and weeds control practices. Despite this, limited scientific information has been documented so far on their interaction effects on tef crop productivity in northern Ethiopia. The objective of this study was to assess the separate and interaction effects of tillage, fertilizer, and weed control practices on tef yield and yield components in the conditions of northern Ethiopia. A two-year study (2008-2009) was conducted using split-split-plot design with three replications. In the main plot, three tillage treatments: conventional tillage (6 times tillage passes) (T1), four times tillage passes (T2), and reduced tillage (single tillage pass at sowing) (T3) were applied. The fertilizer treatments in the subplots were: no fertilizer (F1); 23 kg N ha(−1) (F2); 23 kg N ha(−1) and 10 kg P ha(−1) (F3); 23 kg N ha(−1) and 2.5 ton manure ha(−1) (F4); and 2.5 ton manure ha(−1) (F5). The sub-subplot weed control treatments included farmer weed control practice or hand weeding (W1); 2,4 D at 0.75 kg ha(−1) at five-leaf stage; 2,4 D at 0.75 kg ha(−1) at six-leaf stage; 2,4 D at 1.5 kg ha(−1) at five-leaf stage; and 2,4 D at 1.5 kg ha(−1) at six-leaf stage. This study showed that the separate and interaction effects of tillage, fertilizer, and weed control practices significantly affected tef crop yield and yield components in both crop seasons. T2 increased tef yield by >42% over the other tillage and F3 increased yield by >21% over the other fertilizer treatments. Grain yield increased by >23% due to W1. This study thus suggested that promising treatments such as T2, F3, and W1 should be demonstrated at on-farm fields in order to evaluate their performance at farmers' conditions. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4897397/ /pubmed/27379271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/439718 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gebreyesus Brhane Tesfahunegn. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tesfahunegn, Gebreyesus Brhane Response of Yield and Yield Components of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] to Tillage, Nutrient, and Weed Management Practices in Dura Area, Northern Ethiopia |
title | Response of Yield and Yield Components of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] to Tillage, Nutrient, and Weed Management Practices in Dura Area, Northern Ethiopia |
title_full | Response of Yield and Yield Components of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] to Tillage, Nutrient, and Weed Management Practices in Dura Area, Northern Ethiopia |
title_fullStr | Response of Yield and Yield Components of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] to Tillage, Nutrient, and Weed Management Practices in Dura Area, Northern Ethiopia |
title_full_unstemmed | Response of Yield and Yield Components of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] to Tillage, Nutrient, and Weed Management Practices in Dura Area, Northern Ethiopia |
title_short | Response of Yield and Yield Components of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] to Tillage, Nutrient, and Weed Management Practices in Dura Area, Northern Ethiopia |
title_sort | response of yield and yield components of tef [eragrostis tef (zucc.) trotter] to tillage, nutrient, and weed management practices in dura area, northern ethiopia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27379271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/439718 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tesfahunegngebreyesusbrhane responseofyieldandyieldcomponentsofteferagrostistefzucctrottertotillagenutrientandweedmanagementpracticesinduraareanorthernethiopia |