Cargando…

Anatomical Variations of Cystic Ducts in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Clinical Implications

Background. Anatomical variations of cystic duct (CD) are frequently unrecognized. It is important to be aware of these variations prior to any surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic intervention procedures. Objectives. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the imaging features of CD and its va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarawagi, Radha, Sundar, Shyam, Gupta, Sanjeev K., Raghuwanshi, Sameer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3021484
_version_ 1782436224216072192
author Sarawagi, Radha
Sundar, Shyam
Gupta, Sanjeev K.
Raghuwanshi, Sameer
author_facet Sarawagi, Radha
Sundar, Shyam
Gupta, Sanjeev K.
Raghuwanshi, Sameer
author_sort Sarawagi, Radha
collection PubMed
description Background. Anatomical variations of cystic duct (CD) are frequently unrecognized. It is important to be aware of these variations prior to any surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic intervention procedures. Objectives. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the imaging features of CD and its variants using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and document their prevalence in our population. Materials and Methods. This study included 198 patients who underwent MRCP due to different indications. Images were evaluated in picture archiving communication system (PACS) and variations of CD were documented. Results. Normal lateral insertion of CD at middle third of common hepatic duct was seen in 51% of cases. Medial insertion was seen in 16% of cases, of which 4% were low medial insertions. Low insertion of CD was noted in 9% of cases. Parallel course of CD was present in 7.5% of cases. High insertion was noted in 6% and short CD in 1% of cases. In 1 case, CD was draining into right hepatic duct. Congenital cystic dilation of CD was noted in one case with evidence of type IV choledochal cyst. Conclusion. Cystic duct variations are common and MRCP is an optimal imaging modality for demonstration of cystic duct anatomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4897729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48977292016-06-16 Anatomical Variations of Cystic Ducts in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Clinical Implications Sarawagi, Radha Sundar, Shyam Gupta, Sanjeev K. Raghuwanshi, Sameer Radiol Res Pract Research Article Background. Anatomical variations of cystic duct (CD) are frequently unrecognized. It is important to be aware of these variations prior to any surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic intervention procedures. Objectives. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the imaging features of CD and its variants using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and document their prevalence in our population. Materials and Methods. This study included 198 patients who underwent MRCP due to different indications. Images were evaluated in picture archiving communication system (PACS) and variations of CD were documented. Results. Normal lateral insertion of CD at middle third of common hepatic duct was seen in 51% of cases. Medial insertion was seen in 16% of cases, of which 4% were low medial insertions. Low insertion of CD was noted in 9% of cases. Parallel course of CD was present in 7.5% of cases. High insertion was noted in 6% and short CD in 1% of cases. In 1 case, CD was draining into right hepatic duct. Congenital cystic dilation of CD was noted in one case with evidence of type IV choledochal cyst. Conclusion. Cystic duct variations are common and MRCP is an optimal imaging modality for demonstration of cystic duct anatomy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4897729/ /pubmed/27313891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3021484 Text en Copyright © 2016 Radha Sarawagi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sarawagi, Radha
Sundar, Shyam
Gupta, Sanjeev K.
Raghuwanshi, Sameer
Anatomical Variations of Cystic Ducts in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Clinical Implications
title Anatomical Variations of Cystic Ducts in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Clinical Implications
title_full Anatomical Variations of Cystic Ducts in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Clinical Implications
title_fullStr Anatomical Variations of Cystic Ducts in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Clinical Implications
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical Variations of Cystic Ducts in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Clinical Implications
title_short Anatomical Variations of Cystic Ducts in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Clinical Implications
title_sort anatomical variations of cystic ducts in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and clinical implications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3021484
work_keys_str_mv AT sarawagiradha anatomicalvariationsofcysticductsinmagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyandclinicalimplications
AT sundarshyam anatomicalvariationsofcysticductsinmagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyandclinicalimplications
AT guptasanjeevk anatomicalvariationsofcysticductsinmagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyandclinicalimplications
AT raghuwanshisameer anatomicalvariationsofcysticductsinmagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyandclinicalimplications