Cargando…

Negligible risk of inducing resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with single-dose rifampicin as post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for leprosy is administered as one single dose of rifampicin (SDR) to the contacts of newly diagnosed leprosy patients. SDR reduces the risk of developing leprosy among contacts by around 60 % in the first 2–3 years after receiving SDR. In countries where SDR is curre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mieras, Liesbeth, Anthony, Richard, van Brakel, Wim, Bratschi, Martin W., van den Broek, Jacques, Cambau, Emmanuelle, Cavaliero, Arielle, Kasang, Christa, Perera, Geethal, Reichman, Lee, Richardus, Jan Hendrik, Saunderson, Paul, Steinmann, Peter, Yew, Wing Wai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27268059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-016-0140-y
_version_ 1782436240699686912
author Mieras, Liesbeth
Anthony, Richard
van Brakel, Wim
Bratschi, Martin W.
van den Broek, Jacques
Cambau, Emmanuelle
Cavaliero, Arielle
Kasang, Christa
Perera, Geethal
Reichman, Lee
Richardus, Jan Hendrik
Saunderson, Paul
Steinmann, Peter
Yew, Wing Wai
author_facet Mieras, Liesbeth
Anthony, Richard
van Brakel, Wim
Bratschi, Martin W.
van den Broek, Jacques
Cambau, Emmanuelle
Cavaliero, Arielle
Kasang, Christa
Perera, Geethal
Reichman, Lee
Richardus, Jan Hendrik
Saunderson, Paul
Steinmann, Peter
Yew, Wing Wai
author_sort Mieras, Liesbeth
collection PubMed
description Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for leprosy is administered as one single dose of rifampicin (SDR) to the contacts of newly diagnosed leprosy patients. SDR reduces the risk of developing leprosy among contacts by around 60 % in the first 2–3 years after receiving SDR. In countries where SDR is currently being implemented under routine programme conditions in defined areas, questions were raised by health authorities and professional bodies about the possible risk of inducing rifampicin resistance among the M. tuberculosis strains circulating in these areas. This issue has not been addressed in scientific literature to date. To produce an authoritative consensus statement about the risk that SDR would induce rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, a meeting was convened with tuberculosis (TB) and leprosy experts. The experts carefully reviewed and discussed the available evidence regarding the mechanisms and risk factors for the development of (multi) drug-resistance in M. tuberculosis with a view to the special situation of the use of SDR as PEP for leprosy. They concluded that SDR given to contacts of leprosy patients, in the absence of symptoms of active TB, poses a negligible risk of generating resistance in M. tuberculosis in individuals and at the population level. Thus, the benefits of SDR prophylaxis in reducing the risk of developing leprosy in contacts of new leprosy patients far outweigh the risks of generating drug resistance in M. tuberculosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40249-016-0140-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4897814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48978142016-06-09 Negligible risk of inducing resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with single-dose rifampicin as post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy Mieras, Liesbeth Anthony, Richard van Brakel, Wim Bratschi, Martin W. van den Broek, Jacques Cambau, Emmanuelle Cavaliero, Arielle Kasang, Christa Perera, Geethal Reichman, Lee Richardus, Jan Hendrik Saunderson, Paul Steinmann, Peter Yew, Wing Wai Infect Dis Poverty Scoping Review Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for leprosy is administered as one single dose of rifampicin (SDR) to the contacts of newly diagnosed leprosy patients. SDR reduces the risk of developing leprosy among contacts by around 60 % in the first 2–3 years after receiving SDR. In countries where SDR is currently being implemented under routine programme conditions in defined areas, questions were raised by health authorities and professional bodies about the possible risk of inducing rifampicin resistance among the M. tuberculosis strains circulating in these areas. This issue has not been addressed in scientific literature to date. To produce an authoritative consensus statement about the risk that SDR would induce rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, a meeting was convened with tuberculosis (TB) and leprosy experts. The experts carefully reviewed and discussed the available evidence regarding the mechanisms and risk factors for the development of (multi) drug-resistance in M. tuberculosis with a view to the special situation of the use of SDR as PEP for leprosy. They concluded that SDR given to contacts of leprosy patients, in the absence of symptoms of active TB, poses a negligible risk of generating resistance in M. tuberculosis in individuals and at the population level. Thus, the benefits of SDR prophylaxis in reducing the risk of developing leprosy in contacts of new leprosy patients far outweigh the risks of generating drug resistance in M. tuberculosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40249-016-0140-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4897814/ /pubmed/27268059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-016-0140-y Text en © Mieras et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Scoping Review
Mieras, Liesbeth
Anthony, Richard
van Brakel, Wim
Bratschi, Martin W.
van den Broek, Jacques
Cambau, Emmanuelle
Cavaliero, Arielle
Kasang, Christa
Perera, Geethal
Reichman, Lee
Richardus, Jan Hendrik
Saunderson, Paul
Steinmann, Peter
Yew, Wing Wai
Negligible risk of inducing resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with single-dose rifampicin as post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy
title Negligible risk of inducing resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with single-dose rifampicin as post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy
title_full Negligible risk of inducing resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with single-dose rifampicin as post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy
title_fullStr Negligible risk of inducing resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with single-dose rifampicin as post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy
title_full_unstemmed Negligible risk of inducing resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with single-dose rifampicin as post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy
title_short Negligible risk of inducing resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with single-dose rifampicin as post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy
title_sort negligible risk of inducing resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis with single-dose rifampicin as post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy
topic Scoping Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27268059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-016-0140-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mierasliesbeth negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT anthonyrichard negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT vanbrakelwim negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT bratschimartinw negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT vandenbroekjacques negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT cambauemmanuelle negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT cavalieroarielle negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT kasangchrista negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT pererageethal negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT reichmanlee negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT richardusjanhendrik negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT saundersonpaul negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT steinmannpeter negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy
AT yewwingwai negligibleriskofinducingresistanceinmycobacteriumtuberculosiswithsingledoserifampicinaspostexposureprophylaxisforleprosy