Cargando…
Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews
BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains are a significant clinical problem. Researchers have identified a multitude of factors contributing to the presence of recurrent ankle sprains including deficits in balance, postural control, kinematics, muscle activity, strength, range of motion, ligament laxity and bone/j...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27267881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0275-8 |
_version_ | 1782436258178400256 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Cassandra Schabrun, Siobhan Romero, Rick Bialocerkowski, Andrea Marshall, Paul |
author_facet | Thompson, Cassandra Schabrun, Siobhan Romero, Rick Bialocerkowski, Andrea Marshall, Paul |
author_sort | Thompson, Cassandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains are a significant clinical problem. Researchers have identified a multitude of factors contributing to the presence of recurrent ankle sprains including deficits in balance, postural control, kinematics, muscle activity, strength, range of motion, ligament laxity and bone/joint characteristics. Unfortunately, the literature examining the presence of these factors in chronic ankle instability (CAI) is conflicting. As a result, researchers have attempted to integrate this evidence using systematic reviews to reach conclusions; however, readers are now faced with an increasing number of systematic review findings that are also conflicting. The overall aim of this review is to critically appraise the methodological quality of previous systematic reviews and pool this evidence to identify contributing factors to CAI. METHODS: A systematic review will be conducted on systematic reviews that investigate the presence of various deficits identified in CAI. Databases will be searched using pre-determined search terms. Reviews will then be assessed for inclusion based on the set eligibility criteria. Two independent reviewers will assess the articles for inclusion before evaluating the methodological quality and presence of bias of the included studies; any disagreements will be resolved by discussion between reviewers to reach consensus or by a third reviewer. Data concerning the specific research question, search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, population, method and outcomes will be extracted. Findings will be analysed with respect to the methodological quality of the included reviews. DISCUSSION: It is expected that this review will clarify the cause of contradicting findings in the literature and facilitate future research directions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016032592. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0275-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4897901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48979012016-06-09 Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews Thompson, Cassandra Schabrun, Siobhan Romero, Rick Bialocerkowski, Andrea Marshall, Paul Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains are a significant clinical problem. Researchers have identified a multitude of factors contributing to the presence of recurrent ankle sprains including deficits in balance, postural control, kinematics, muscle activity, strength, range of motion, ligament laxity and bone/joint characteristics. Unfortunately, the literature examining the presence of these factors in chronic ankle instability (CAI) is conflicting. As a result, researchers have attempted to integrate this evidence using systematic reviews to reach conclusions; however, readers are now faced with an increasing number of systematic review findings that are also conflicting. The overall aim of this review is to critically appraise the methodological quality of previous systematic reviews and pool this evidence to identify contributing factors to CAI. METHODS: A systematic review will be conducted on systematic reviews that investigate the presence of various deficits identified in CAI. Databases will be searched using pre-determined search terms. Reviews will then be assessed for inclusion based on the set eligibility criteria. Two independent reviewers will assess the articles for inclusion before evaluating the methodological quality and presence of bias of the included studies; any disagreements will be resolved by discussion between reviewers to reach consensus or by a third reviewer. Data concerning the specific research question, search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, population, method and outcomes will be extracted. Findings will be analysed with respect to the methodological quality of the included reviews. DISCUSSION: It is expected that this review will clarify the cause of contradicting findings in the literature and facilitate future research directions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016032592. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0275-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4897901/ /pubmed/27267881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0275-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Thompson, Cassandra Schabrun, Siobhan Romero, Rick Bialocerkowski, Andrea Marshall, Paul Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title | Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_full | Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_fullStr | Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_short | Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_sort | factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27267881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0275-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsoncassandra factorscontributingtochronicankleinstabilityaprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT schabrunsiobhan factorscontributingtochronicankleinstabilityaprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT romerorick factorscontributingtochronicankleinstabilityaprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT bialocerkowskiandrea factorscontributingtochronicankleinstabilityaprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT marshallpaul factorscontributingtochronicankleinstabilityaprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews |