Cargando…

Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains are a significant clinical problem. Researchers have identified a multitude of factors contributing to the presence of recurrent ankle sprains including deficits in balance, postural control, kinematics, muscle activity, strength, range of motion, ligament laxity and bone/j...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Cassandra, Schabrun, Siobhan, Romero, Rick, Bialocerkowski, Andrea, Marshall, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27267881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0275-8
_version_ 1782436258178400256
author Thompson, Cassandra
Schabrun, Siobhan
Romero, Rick
Bialocerkowski, Andrea
Marshall, Paul
author_facet Thompson, Cassandra
Schabrun, Siobhan
Romero, Rick
Bialocerkowski, Andrea
Marshall, Paul
author_sort Thompson, Cassandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains are a significant clinical problem. Researchers have identified a multitude of factors contributing to the presence of recurrent ankle sprains including deficits in balance, postural control, kinematics, muscle activity, strength, range of motion, ligament laxity and bone/joint characteristics. Unfortunately, the literature examining the presence of these factors in chronic ankle instability (CAI) is conflicting. As a result, researchers have attempted to integrate this evidence using systematic reviews to reach conclusions; however, readers are now faced with an increasing number of systematic review findings that are also conflicting. The overall aim of this review is to critically appraise the methodological quality of previous systematic reviews and pool this evidence to identify contributing factors to CAI. METHODS: A systematic review will be conducted on systematic reviews that investigate the presence of various deficits identified in CAI. Databases will be searched using pre-determined search terms. Reviews will then be assessed for inclusion based on the set eligibility criteria. Two independent reviewers will assess the articles for inclusion before evaluating the methodological quality and presence of bias of the included studies; any disagreements will be resolved by discussion between reviewers to reach consensus or by a third reviewer. Data concerning the specific research question, search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, population, method and outcomes will be extracted. Findings will be analysed with respect to the methodological quality of the included reviews. DISCUSSION: It is expected that this review will clarify the cause of contradicting findings in the literature and facilitate future research directions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016032592. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0275-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4897901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48979012016-06-09 Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews Thompson, Cassandra Schabrun, Siobhan Romero, Rick Bialocerkowski, Andrea Marshall, Paul Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains are a significant clinical problem. Researchers have identified a multitude of factors contributing to the presence of recurrent ankle sprains including deficits in balance, postural control, kinematics, muscle activity, strength, range of motion, ligament laxity and bone/joint characteristics. Unfortunately, the literature examining the presence of these factors in chronic ankle instability (CAI) is conflicting. As a result, researchers have attempted to integrate this evidence using systematic reviews to reach conclusions; however, readers are now faced with an increasing number of systematic review findings that are also conflicting. The overall aim of this review is to critically appraise the methodological quality of previous systematic reviews and pool this evidence to identify contributing factors to CAI. METHODS: A systematic review will be conducted on systematic reviews that investigate the presence of various deficits identified in CAI. Databases will be searched using pre-determined search terms. Reviews will then be assessed for inclusion based on the set eligibility criteria. Two independent reviewers will assess the articles for inclusion before evaluating the methodological quality and presence of bias of the included studies; any disagreements will be resolved by discussion between reviewers to reach consensus or by a third reviewer. Data concerning the specific research question, search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, population, method and outcomes will be extracted. Findings will be analysed with respect to the methodological quality of the included reviews. DISCUSSION: It is expected that this review will clarify the cause of contradicting findings in the literature and facilitate future research directions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016032592. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0275-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4897901/ /pubmed/27267881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0275-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Thompson, Cassandra
Schabrun, Siobhan
Romero, Rick
Bialocerkowski, Andrea
Marshall, Paul
Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews
title Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews
title_full Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews
title_short Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews
title_sort factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4897901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27267881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0275-8
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsoncassandra factorscontributingtochronicankleinstabilityaprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT schabrunsiobhan factorscontributingtochronicankleinstabilityaprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT romerorick factorscontributingtochronicankleinstabilityaprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT bialocerkowskiandrea factorscontributingtochronicankleinstabilityaprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT marshallpaul factorscontributingtochronicankleinstabilityaprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews