Cargando…
Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Distinguishing pancreatic ductal carcinoma (DC) from other pancreatic masses remains challenging. This study aims at evaluating the efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CEH-EUS) in the diagnosis of DC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with soli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184637 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.182457 |
_version_ | 1782436287690571776 |
---|---|
author | Uekitani, Toshiyuki Kaino, Seiji Harima, Hirofumi Suenaga, Shigeyuki Sen-yo, Manabu Sakaida, Isao |
author_facet | Uekitani, Toshiyuki Kaino, Seiji Harima, Hirofumi Suenaga, Shigeyuki Sen-yo, Manabu Sakaida, Isao |
author_sort | Uekitani, Toshiyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Distinguishing pancreatic ductal carcinoma (DC) from other pancreatic masses remains challenging. This study aims at evaluating the efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CEH-EUS) in the diagnosis of DC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with solid pancreatic mass lesions underwent CEH-EUS. EUS (B-mode) was used to evaluate the inner echoes, distributions, and borders of the masses. The vascular patterns of the masses were evaluated with CEH-EUS at 30–50 s (early phase) and 70–90 s (late phase) after the administration of Sonazoid(®). RESULTS: The final diagnoses included DCs (37), mass-forming pancreatitis (6), endocrine neoplasms (3), a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (1), a metastatic carcinoma (1), and an acinar cell carcinoma (1). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the diagnoses of DC in hypoechoic masses using EUS (B-mode) were 89.2%, 16.7%, and 71.4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of DC in hypovascular masses using CEH-EUS were 73.0%, 91.7%, and 77.6% in the early phase and 83.8%, 91.7%, and 85.7% in the late phase, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CEH-EUS for the diagnosis of DC is superior to EUS. CEH-EUS in the late phase was particularly efficacious in the diagnosis of DC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4898088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48980882016-06-13 Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma Uekitani, Toshiyuki Kaino, Seiji Harima, Hirofumi Suenaga, Shigeyuki Sen-yo, Manabu Sakaida, Isao Saudi J Gastroenterol Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Distinguishing pancreatic ductal carcinoma (DC) from other pancreatic masses remains challenging. This study aims at evaluating the efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CEH-EUS) in the diagnosis of DC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with solid pancreatic mass lesions underwent CEH-EUS. EUS (B-mode) was used to evaluate the inner echoes, distributions, and borders of the masses. The vascular patterns of the masses were evaluated with CEH-EUS at 30–50 s (early phase) and 70–90 s (late phase) after the administration of Sonazoid(®). RESULTS: The final diagnoses included DCs (37), mass-forming pancreatitis (6), endocrine neoplasms (3), a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (1), a metastatic carcinoma (1), and an acinar cell carcinoma (1). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the diagnoses of DC in hypoechoic masses using EUS (B-mode) were 89.2%, 16.7%, and 71.4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of DC in hypovascular masses using CEH-EUS were 73.0%, 91.7%, and 77.6% in the early phase and 83.8%, 91.7%, and 85.7% in the late phase, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CEH-EUS for the diagnosis of DC is superior to EUS. CEH-EUS in the late phase was particularly efficacious in the diagnosis of DC. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4898088/ /pubmed/27184637 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.182457 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology (Official journal of The Saudi Gastroenterology Association) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Uekitani, Toshiyuki Kaino, Seiji Harima, Hirofumi Suenaga, Shigeyuki Sen-yo, Manabu Sakaida, Isao Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma |
title | Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma |
title_full | Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma |
title_short | Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma |
title_sort | efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal carcinoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184637 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.182457 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uekitanitoshiyuki efficacyofcontrastenhancedharmonicendoscopicultrasonographyinthediagnosisofpancreaticductalcarcinoma AT kainoseiji efficacyofcontrastenhancedharmonicendoscopicultrasonographyinthediagnosisofpancreaticductalcarcinoma AT harimahirofumi efficacyofcontrastenhancedharmonicendoscopicultrasonographyinthediagnosisofpancreaticductalcarcinoma AT suenagashigeyuki efficacyofcontrastenhancedharmonicendoscopicultrasonographyinthediagnosisofpancreaticductalcarcinoma AT senyomanabu efficacyofcontrastenhancedharmonicendoscopicultrasonographyinthediagnosisofpancreaticductalcarcinoma AT sakaidaisao efficacyofcontrastenhancedharmonicendoscopicultrasonographyinthediagnosisofpancreaticductalcarcinoma |