Cargando…

Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Distinguishing pancreatic ductal carcinoma (DC) from other pancreatic masses remains challenging. This study aims at evaluating the efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CEH-EUS) in the diagnosis of DC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with soli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uekitani, Toshiyuki, Kaino, Seiji, Harima, Hirofumi, Suenaga, Shigeyuki, Sen-yo, Manabu, Sakaida, Isao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184637
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.182457
_version_ 1782436287690571776
author Uekitani, Toshiyuki
Kaino, Seiji
Harima, Hirofumi
Suenaga, Shigeyuki
Sen-yo, Manabu
Sakaida, Isao
author_facet Uekitani, Toshiyuki
Kaino, Seiji
Harima, Hirofumi
Suenaga, Shigeyuki
Sen-yo, Manabu
Sakaida, Isao
author_sort Uekitani, Toshiyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Distinguishing pancreatic ductal carcinoma (DC) from other pancreatic masses remains challenging. This study aims at evaluating the efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CEH-EUS) in the diagnosis of DC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with solid pancreatic mass lesions underwent CEH-EUS. EUS (B-mode) was used to evaluate the inner echoes, distributions, and borders of the masses. The vascular patterns of the masses were evaluated with CEH-EUS at 30–50 s (early phase) and 70–90 s (late phase) after the administration of Sonazoid(®). RESULTS: The final diagnoses included DCs (37), mass-forming pancreatitis (6), endocrine neoplasms (3), a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (1), a metastatic carcinoma (1), and an acinar cell carcinoma (1). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the diagnoses of DC in hypoechoic masses using EUS (B-mode) were 89.2%, 16.7%, and 71.4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of DC in hypovascular masses using CEH-EUS were 73.0%, 91.7%, and 77.6% in the early phase and 83.8%, 91.7%, and 85.7% in the late phase, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CEH-EUS for the diagnosis of DC is superior to EUS. CEH-EUS in the late phase was particularly efficacious in the diagnosis of DC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4898088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48980882016-06-13 Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma Uekitani, Toshiyuki Kaino, Seiji Harima, Hirofumi Suenaga, Shigeyuki Sen-yo, Manabu Sakaida, Isao Saudi J Gastroenterol Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Distinguishing pancreatic ductal carcinoma (DC) from other pancreatic masses remains challenging. This study aims at evaluating the efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CEH-EUS) in the diagnosis of DC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with solid pancreatic mass lesions underwent CEH-EUS. EUS (B-mode) was used to evaluate the inner echoes, distributions, and borders of the masses. The vascular patterns of the masses were evaluated with CEH-EUS at 30–50 s (early phase) and 70–90 s (late phase) after the administration of Sonazoid(®). RESULTS: The final diagnoses included DCs (37), mass-forming pancreatitis (6), endocrine neoplasms (3), a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (1), a metastatic carcinoma (1), and an acinar cell carcinoma (1). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the diagnoses of DC in hypoechoic masses using EUS (B-mode) were 89.2%, 16.7%, and 71.4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of DC in hypovascular masses using CEH-EUS were 73.0%, 91.7%, and 77.6% in the early phase and 83.8%, 91.7%, and 85.7% in the late phase, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CEH-EUS for the diagnosis of DC is superior to EUS. CEH-EUS in the late phase was particularly efficacious in the diagnosis of DC. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4898088/ /pubmed/27184637 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.182457 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology (Official journal of The Saudi Gastroenterology Association) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Uekitani, Toshiyuki
Kaino, Seiji
Harima, Hirofumi
Suenaga, Shigeyuki
Sen-yo, Manabu
Sakaida, Isao
Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma
title Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma
title_full Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma
title_fullStr Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma
title_short Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma
title_sort efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184637
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.182457
work_keys_str_mv AT uekitanitoshiyuki efficacyofcontrastenhancedharmonicendoscopicultrasonographyinthediagnosisofpancreaticductalcarcinoma
AT kainoseiji efficacyofcontrastenhancedharmonicendoscopicultrasonographyinthediagnosisofpancreaticductalcarcinoma
AT harimahirofumi efficacyofcontrastenhancedharmonicendoscopicultrasonographyinthediagnosisofpancreaticductalcarcinoma
AT suenagashigeyuki efficacyofcontrastenhancedharmonicendoscopicultrasonographyinthediagnosisofpancreaticductalcarcinoma
AT senyomanabu efficacyofcontrastenhancedharmonicendoscopicultrasonographyinthediagnosisofpancreaticductalcarcinoma
AT sakaidaisao efficacyofcontrastenhancedharmonicendoscopicultrasonographyinthediagnosisofpancreaticductalcarcinoma