Cargando…

Pharmacokinetic analysis and comparison of caffeine administered rapidly or slowly in coffee chilled or hot versus chilled energy drink in healthy young adults

Context: There is a paucity of data describing the impact of type of beverage (coffee versus energy drink), different rates of consumption and different temperature of beverages on the pharmacokinetic disposition of caffeine. Additionally, there is concern that inordinately high levels of caffeine m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, John R., Padowski, Jeannie M., Zhong, Yili, Chen, Gang, Luo, Shaman, Lazarus, Philip, Layton, Matthew E., McPherson, Sterling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27100333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2016.1146740
_version_ 1782436302477590528
author White, John R.
Padowski, Jeannie M.
Zhong, Yili
Chen, Gang
Luo, Shaman
Lazarus, Philip
Layton, Matthew E.
McPherson, Sterling
author_facet White, John R.
Padowski, Jeannie M.
Zhong, Yili
Chen, Gang
Luo, Shaman
Lazarus, Philip
Layton, Matthew E.
McPherson, Sterling
author_sort White, John R.
collection PubMed
description Context: There is a paucity of data describing the impact of type of beverage (coffee versus energy drink), different rates of consumption and different temperature of beverages on the pharmacokinetic disposition of caffeine. Additionally, there is concern that inordinately high levels of caffeine may result from the rapid consumption of cold energy drinks. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of caffeine under various drink temperature, rate of consumption and vehicle (coffee versus energy drink) conditions. Materials: Five caffeine (dose = 160 mg) conditions were evaluated in an open-label, group-randomized, crossover fashion. After the administration of each caffeine dose, 10 serial plasma samples were harvested. Caffeine concentration was measured via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), and those concentrations were assessed by non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. The calculated mean pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed statistically by one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (RM ANOVA). If differences were found, each group was compared to the other by all pair-wise multiple comparison. Results: Twenty-four healthy subjects ranging in age from 18 to 30 completed the study. The mean caffeine concentration time profiles were similar with overlapping SDs at all measured time points. The ANOVA revealed significant differences in mean C (max) and V (d ss)/F, but no pair-wise comparisons reached statistical significance. No other differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were found. Discussion: The results of this study are consistent with previous caffeine pharmacokinetic studies and suggest that while rate of consumption, temperature of beverage and vehicle (coffee versus energy drink) may be associated with slightly different pharmacokinetic parameters, the overall impact of these variables is small. Conclusion: This study suggests that caffeine absorption and exposure from coffee and energy drink is similar irrespective of beverage temperature or rate of consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4898153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48981532016-06-20 Pharmacokinetic analysis and comparison of caffeine administered rapidly or slowly in coffee chilled or hot versus chilled energy drink in healthy young adults White, John R. Padowski, Jeannie M. Zhong, Yili Chen, Gang Luo, Shaman Lazarus, Philip Layton, Matthew E. McPherson, Sterling Clin Toxicol (Phila) Research Context: There is a paucity of data describing the impact of type of beverage (coffee versus energy drink), different rates of consumption and different temperature of beverages on the pharmacokinetic disposition of caffeine. Additionally, there is concern that inordinately high levels of caffeine may result from the rapid consumption of cold energy drinks. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of caffeine under various drink temperature, rate of consumption and vehicle (coffee versus energy drink) conditions. Materials: Five caffeine (dose = 160 mg) conditions were evaluated in an open-label, group-randomized, crossover fashion. After the administration of each caffeine dose, 10 serial plasma samples were harvested. Caffeine concentration was measured via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), and those concentrations were assessed by non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. The calculated mean pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed statistically by one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (RM ANOVA). If differences were found, each group was compared to the other by all pair-wise multiple comparison. Results: Twenty-four healthy subjects ranging in age from 18 to 30 completed the study. The mean caffeine concentration time profiles were similar with overlapping SDs at all measured time points. The ANOVA revealed significant differences in mean C (max) and V (d ss)/F, but no pair-wise comparisons reached statistical significance. No other differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were found. Discussion: The results of this study are consistent with previous caffeine pharmacokinetic studies and suggest that while rate of consumption, temperature of beverage and vehicle (coffee versus energy drink) may be associated with slightly different pharmacokinetic parameters, the overall impact of these variables is small. Conclusion: This study suggests that caffeine absorption and exposure from coffee and energy drink is similar irrespective of beverage temperature or rate of consumption. Taylor & Francis 2016-04-20 2016-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4898153/ /pubmed/27100333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2016.1146740 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Research
White, John R.
Padowski, Jeannie M.
Zhong, Yili
Chen, Gang
Luo, Shaman
Lazarus, Philip
Layton, Matthew E.
McPherson, Sterling
Pharmacokinetic analysis and comparison of caffeine administered rapidly or slowly in coffee chilled or hot versus chilled energy drink in healthy young adults
title Pharmacokinetic analysis and comparison of caffeine administered rapidly or slowly in coffee chilled or hot versus chilled energy drink in healthy young adults
title_full Pharmacokinetic analysis and comparison of caffeine administered rapidly or slowly in coffee chilled or hot versus chilled energy drink in healthy young adults
title_fullStr Pharmacokinetic analysis and comparison of caffeine administered rapidly or slowly in coffee chilled or hot versus chilled energy drink in healthy young adults
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacokinetic analysis and comparison of caffeine administered rapidly or slowly in coffee chilled or hot versus chilled energy drink in healthy young adults
title_short Pharmacokinetic analysis and comparison of caffeine administered rapidly or slowly in coffee chilled or hot versus chilled energy drink in healthy young adults
title_sort pharmacokinetic analysis and comparison of caffeine administered rapidly or slowly in coffee chilled or hot versus chilled energy drink in healthy young adults
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27100333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2016.1146740
work_keys_str_mv AT whitejohnr pharmacokineticanalysisandcomparisonofcaffeineadministeredrapidlyorslowlyincoffeechilledorhotversuschilledenergydrinkinhealthyyoungadults
AT padowskijeanniem pharmacokineticanalysisandcomparisonofcaffeineadministeredrapidlyorslowlyincoffeechilledorhotversuschilledenergydrinkinhealthyyoungadults
AT zhongyili pharmacokineticanalysisandcomparisonofcaffeineadministeredrapidlyorslowlyincoffeechilledorhotversuschilledenergydrinkinhealthyyoungadults
AT chengang pharmacokineticanalysisandcomparisonofcaffeineadministeredrapidlyorslowlyincoffeechilledorhotversuschilledenergydrinkinhealthyyoungadults
AT luoshaman pharmacokineticanalysisandcomparisonofcaffeineadministeredrapidlyorslowlyincoffeechilledorhotversuschilledenergydrinkinhealthyyoungadults
AT lazarusphilip pharmacokineticanalysisandcomparisonofcaffeineadministeredrapidlyorslowlyincoffeechilledorhotversuschilledenergydrinkinhealthyyoungadults
AT laytonmatthewe pharmacokineticanalysisandcomparisonofcaffeineadministeredrapidlyorslowlyincoffeechilledorhotversuschilledenergydrinkinhealthyyoungadults
AT mcphersonsterling pharmacokineticanalysisandcomparisonofcaffeineadministeredrapidlyorslowlyincoffeechilledorhotversuschilledenergydrinkinhealthyyoungadults