Cargando…
Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes
The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) has shown promise as a functional vision endpoint for monitoring the changes in functional vision that accompany eye disease or its treatment. However, detecting CSF changes with precision and efficiency at both the individual and group levels is very challeng...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27120074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/16.6.18 |
_version_ | 1782436324654972928 |
---|---|
author | Hou, Fang Lesmes, Luis Andres Kim, Woojae Gu, Hairong Pitt, Mark A. Myung, Jay I. Lu, Zhong-Lin |
author_facet | Hou, Fang Lesmes, Luis Andres Kim, Woojae Gu, Hairong Pitt, Mark A. Myung, Jay I. Lu, Zhong-Lin |
author_sort | Hou, Fang |
collection | PubMed |
description | The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) has shown promise as a functional vision endpoint for monitoring the changes in functional vision that accompany eye disease or its treatment. However, detecting CSF changes with precision and efficiency at both the individual and group levels is very challenging. By exploiting the Bayesian foundation of the quick CSF method (Lesmes, Lu, Baek, & Albright, 2010), we developed and evaluated metrics for detecting CSF changes at both the individual and group levels. A 10-letter identification task was used to assess the systematic changes in the CSF measured in three luminance conditions in 112 naïve normal observers. The data from the large sample allowed us to estimate the test–retest reliability of the quick CSF procedure and evaluate its performance in detecting CSF changes at both the individual and group levels. The test–retest reliability reached 0.974 with 50 trials. In 50 trials, the quick CSF method can detect a medium 0.30 log unit area under log CSF change with 94.0% accuracy at the individual observer level. At the group level, a power analysis based on the empirical distribution of CSF changes from the large sample showed that a very small area under log CSF change (0.025 log unit) could be detected by the quick CSF method with 112 observers and 50 trials. These results make it plausible to apply the method to monitor the progression of visual diseases or treatment effects on individual patients and greatly reduce the time, sample size, and costs in clinical trials at the group level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4898274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48982742016-06-17 Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes Hou, Fang Lesmes, Luis Andres Kim, Woojae Gu, Hairong Pitt, Mark A. Myung, Jay I. Lu, Zhong-Lin J Vis Methods The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) has shown promise as a functional vision endpoint for monitoring the changes in functional vision that accompany eye disease or its treatment. However, detecting CSF changes with precision and efficiency at both the individual and group levels is very challenging. By exploiting the Bayesian foundation of the quick CSF method (Lesmes, Lu, Baek, & Albright, 2010), we developed and evaluated metrics for detecting CSF changes at both the individual and group levels. A 10-letter identification task was used to assess the systematic changes in the CSF measured in three luminance conditions in 112 naïve normal observers. The data from the large sample allowed us to estimate the test–retest reliability of the quick CSF procedure and evaluate its performance in detecting CSF changes at both the individual and group levels. The test–retest reliability reached 0.974 with 50 trials. In 50 trials, the quick CSF method can detect a medium 0.30 log unit area under log CSF change with 94.0% accuracy at the individual observer level. At the group level, a power analysis based on the empirical distribution of CSF changes from the large sample showed that a very small area under log CSF change (0.025 log unit) could be detected by the quick CSF method with 112 observers and 50 trials. These results make it plausible to apply the method to monitor the progression of visual diseases or treatment effects on individual patients and greatly reduce the time, sample size, and costs in clinical trials at the group level. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4898274/ /pubmed/27120074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/16.6.18 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Methods Hou, Fang Lesmes, Luis Andres Kim, Woojae Gu, Hairong Pitt, Mark A. Myung, Jay I. Lu, Zhong-Lin Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes |
title | Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes |
title_full | Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes |
title_short | Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes |
title_sort | evaluating the performance of the quick csf method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes |
topic | Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27120074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/16.6.18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houfang evaluatingtheperformanceofthequickcsfmethodindetectingcontrastsensitivityfunctionchanges AT lesmesluisandres evaluatingtheperformanceofthequickcsfmethodindetectingcontrastsensitivityfunctionchanges AT kimwoojae evaluatingtheperformanceofthequickcsfmethodindetectingcontrastsensitivityfunctionchanges AT guhairong evaluatingtheperformanceofthequickcsfmethodindetectingcontrastsensitivityfunctionchanges AT pittmarka evaluatingtheperformanceofthequickcsfmethodindetectingcontrastsensitivityfunctionchanges AT myungjayi evaluatingtheperformanceofthequickcsfmethodindetectingcontrastsensitivityfunctionchanges AT luzhonglin evaluatingtheperformanceofthequickcsfmethodindetectingcontrastsensitivityfunctionchanges |