Cargando…

Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Cervicogenic headache is a prevalent and costly pain condition commonly treated by chiropractors. There is evidence to support the effectiveness for spinal manipulation, but the dose of treatment required to achieve maximal relief remains unknown. The purpose of this paper is to describe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanson, Linda, Haas, Mitchell, Bronfort, Gert, Vavrek, Darcy, Schulz, Craig, Leininger, Brent, Evans, Roni, Takaki, Leslie, Neradilek, Moni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0105-z
_version_ 1782436328540995584
author Hanson, Linda
Haas, Mitchell
Bronfort, Gert
Vavrek, Darcy
Schulz, Craig
Leininger, Brent
Evans, Roni
Takaki, Leslie
Neradilek, Moni
author_facet Hanson, Linda
Haas, Mitchell
Bronfort, Gert
Vavrek, Darcy
Schulz, Craig
Leininger, Brent
Evans, Roni
Takaki, Leslie
Neradilek, Moni
author_sort Hanson, Linda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervicogenic headache is a prevalent and costly pain condition commonly treated by chiropractors. There is evidence to support the effectiveness for spinal manipulation, but the dose of treatment required to achieve maximal relief remains unknown. The purpose of this paper is to describe the methodology for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the dose–response of spinal manipulation for chronic cervicogenic headache in an adult population. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a mixed-methods, two-site, prospective, parallel groups, observer-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted at university-affiliated research clinics in the Portland, OR and Minneapolis, MN areas. The primary outcome is patient reported headache frequency. Other outcomes include self-reported headache intensity, disability, quality of life, improvement, neck pain intensity and frequency, satisfaction, medication use, outside care, cervical motion, pain pressure thresholds, health care utilization, health care costs, and lost productivity. Qualitative interviews are also conducted to evaluate patients’ expectations of treatment. DISCUSSION: With growing concerns regarding the costs and side effects of commonly used conventional treatments, greater numbers of headache sufferers are seeking other approaches to care. This is the first full-scale randomized controlled trial assessing the dose–response of spinal manipulation therapy on outcomes for cervicogenic headache. The results of this study will provide important evidence for the management of cervicogenic headache in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01530321)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4898300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48983002016-06-09 Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Hanson, Linda Haas, Mitchell Bronfort, Gert Vavrek, Darcy Schulz, Craig Leininger, Brent Evans, Roni Takaki, Leslie Neradilek, Moni Chiropr Man Therap Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cervicogenic headache is a prevalent and costly pain condition commonly treated by chiropractors. There is evidence to support the effectiveness for spinal manipulation, but the dose of treatment required to achieve maximal relief remains unknown. The purpose of this paper is to describe the methodology for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the dose–response of spinal manipulation for chronic cervicogenic headache in an adult population. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a mixed-methods, two-site, prospective, parallel groups, observer-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted at university-affiliated research clinics in the Portland, OR and Minneapolis, MN areas. The primary outcome is patient reported headache frequency. Other outcomes include self-reported headache intensity, disability, quality of life, improvement, neck pain intensity and frequency, satisfaction, medication use, outside care, cervical motion, pain pressure thresholds, health care utilization, health care costs, and lost productivity. Qualitative interviews are also conducted to evaluate patients’ expectations of treatment. DISCUSSION: With growing concerns regarding the costs and side effects of commonly used conventional treatments, greater numbers of headache sufferers are seeking other approaches to care. This is the first full-scale randomized controlled trial assessing the dose–response of spinal manipulation therapy on outcomes for cervicogenic headache. The results of this study will provide important evidence for the management of cervicogenic headache in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01530321) BioMed Central 2016-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4898300/ /pubmed/27280016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0105-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hanson, Linda
Haas, Mitchell
Bronfort, Gert
Vavrek, Darcy
Schulz, Craig
Leininger, Brent
Evans, Roni
Takaki, Leslie
Neradilek, Moni
Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0105-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hansonlinda doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haasmitchell doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bronfortgert doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vavrekdarcy doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schulzcraig doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leiningerbrent doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT evansroni doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT takakileslie doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT neradilekmoni doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial