Cargando…
Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Cervicogenic headache is a prevalent and costly pain condition commonly treated by chiropractors. There is evidence to support the effectiveness for spinal manipulation, but the dose of treatment required to achieve maximal relief remains unknown. The purpose of this paper is to describe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0105-z |
_version_ | 1782436328540995584 |
---|---|
author | Hanson, Linda Haas, Mitchell Bronfort, Gert Vavrek, Darcy Schulz, Craig Leininger, Brent Evans, Roni Takaki, Leslie Neradilek, Moni |
author_facet | Hanson, Linda Haas, Mitchell Bronfort, Gert Vavrek, Darcy Schulz, Craig Leininger, Brent Evans, Roni Takaki, Leslie Neradilek, Moni |
author_sort | Hanson, Linda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cervicogenic headache is a prevalent and costly pain condition commonly treated by chiropractors. There is evidence to support the effectiveness for spinal manipulation, but the dose of treatment required to achieve maximal relief remains unknown. The purpose of this paper is to describe the methodology for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the dose–response of spinal manipulation for chronic cervicogenic headache in an adult population. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a mixed-methods, two-site, prospective, parallel groups, observer-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted at university-affiliated research clinics in the Portland, OR and Minneapolis, MN areas. The primary outcome is patient reported headache frequency. Other outcomes include self-reported headache intensity, disability, quality of life, improvement, neck pain intensity and frequency, satisfaction, medication use, outside care, cervical motion, pain pressure thresholds, health care utilization, health care costs, and lost productivity. Qualitative interviews are also conducted to evaluate patients’ expectations of treatment. DISCUSSION: With growing concerns regarding the costs and side effects of commonly used conventional treatments, greater numbers of headache sufferers are seeking other approaches to care. This is the first full-scale randomized controlled trial assessing the dose–response of spinal manipulation therapy on outcomes for cervicogenic headache. The results of this study will provide important evidence for the management of cervicogenic headache in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01530321) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4898300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48983002016-06-09 Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Hanson, Linda Haas, Mitchell Bronfort, Gert Vavrek, Darcy Schulz, Craig Leininger, Brent Evans, Roni Takaki, Leslie Neradilek, Moni Chiropr Man Therap Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cervicogenic headache is a prevalent and costly pain condition commonly treated by chiropractors. There is evidence to support the effectiveness for spinal manipulation, but the dose of treatment required to achieve maximal relief remains unknown. The purpose of this paper is to describe the methodology for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the dose–response of spinal manipulation for chronic cervicogenic headache in an adult population. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a mixed-methods, two-site, prospective, parallel groups, observer-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted at university-affiliated research clinics in the Portland, OR and Minneapolis, MN areas. The primary outcome is patient reported headache frequency. Other outcomes include self-reported headache intensity, disability, quality of life, improvement, neck pain intensity and frequency, satisfaction, medication use, outside care, cervical motion, pain pressure thresholds, health care utilization, health care costs, and lost productivity. Qualitative interviews are also conducted to evaluate patients’ expectations of treatment. DISCUSSION: With growing concerns regarding the costs and side effects of commonly used conventional treatments, greater numbers of headache sufferers are seeking other approaches to care. This is the first full-scale randomized controlled trial assessing the dose–response of spinal manipulation therapy on outcomes for cervicogenic headache. The results of this study will provide important evidence for the management of cervicogenic headache in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01530321) BioMed Central 2016-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4898300/ /pubmed/27280016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0105-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Hanson, Linda Haas, Mitchell Bronfort, Gert Vavrek, Darcy Schulz, Craig Leininger, Brent Evans, Roni Takaki, Leslie Neradilek, Moni Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0105-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansonlinda doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT haasmitchell doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bronfortgert doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vavrekdarcy doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schulzcraig doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leiningerbrent doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT evansroni doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT takakileslie doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT neradilekmoni doseresponseofspinalmanipulationforcervicogenicheadachestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |