Cargando…

Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT)

OBJECTIVE: Our prespecified dose-response analyses of A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) aim to provide practical guidance for clinicians on the timing, frequency, and amount of mobilization following acute stroke. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had confirmed first (or recurr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernhardt, Julie, Churilov, Leonid, Ellery, Fiona, Collier, Janice, Chamberlain, Jan, Langhorne, Peter, Lindley, Richard I., Moodie, Marj, Dewey, Helen, Thrift, Amanda G., Donnan, Geoff
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002459
_version_ 1782436331330207744
author Bernhardt, Julie
Churilov, Leonid
Ellery, Fiona
Collier, Janice
Chamberlain, Jan
Langhorne, Peter
Lindley, Richard I.
Moodie, Marj
Dewey, Helen
Thrift, Amanda G.
Donnan, Geoff
author_facet Bernhardt, Julie
Churilov, Leonid
Ellery, Fiona
Collier, Janice
Chamberlain, Jan
Langhorne, Peter
Lindley, Richard I.
Moodie, Marj
Dewey, Helen
Thrift, Amanda G.
Donnan, Geoff
author_sort Bernhardt, Julie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Our prespecified dose-response analyses of A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) aim to provide practical guidance for clinicians on the timing, frequency, and amount of mobilization following acute stroke. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had confirmed first (or recurrent) stroke, and were admitted to a stroke unit within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were randomized to receive very early and frequent mobilization, commencing within 24 hours, or usual care. We used regression analyses and Classification and Regression Trees (CART) to investigate the effect of timing and dose of mobilization on efficacy and safety outcomes, irrespective of assigned treatment group. RESULTS: A total of 2,104 patients were enrolled, of whom 2,083 (99.0%) were followed up at 3 months. We found a consistent pattern of improved odds of favorable outcome in efficacy and safety outcomes with increased daily frequency of out-of-bed sessions (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 1.18, p < 0.001), keeping time to first mobilization and mobilization amount constant. Increased amount (minutes per day) of mobilization reduced the odds of a good outcome (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.97, p < 0.001). Session frequency was the most important variable in the CART analysis, after prognostic variables age and baseline stroke severity. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that shorter, more frequent mobilization early after acute stroke is associated with greater odds of favorable outcome at 3 months when controlling for age and stroke severity. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that shorter, more frequent early mobilization improves the chance of regaining independence after stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4898313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48983132016-06-22 Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) Bernhardt, Julie Churilov, Leonid Ellery, Fiona Collier, Janice Chamberlain, Jan Langhorne, Peter Lindley, Richard I. Moodie, Marj Dewey, Helen Thrift, Amanda G. Donnan, Geoff Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: Our prespecified dose-response analyses of A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) aim to provide practical guidance for clinicians on the timing, frequency, and amount of mobilization following acute stroke. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had confirmed first (or recurrent) stroke, and were admitted to a stroke unit within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were randomized to receive very early and frequent mobilization, commencing within 24 hours, or usual care. We used regression analyses and Classification and Regression Trees (CART) to investigate the effect of timing and dose of mobilization on efficacy and safety outcomes, irrespective of assigned treatment group. RESULTS: A total of 2,104 patients were enrolled, of whom 2,083 (99.0%) were followed up at 3 months. We found a consistent pattern of improved odds of favorable outcome in efficacy and safety outcomes with increased daily frequency of out-of-bed sessions (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 1.18, p < 0.001), keeping time to first mobilization and mobilization amount constant. Increased amount (minutes per day) of mobilization reduced the odds of a good outcome (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.97, p < 0.001). Session frequency was the most important variable in the CART analysis, after prognostic variables age and baseline stroke severity. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that shorter, more frequent mobilization early after acute stroke is associated with greater odds of favorable outcome at 3 months when controlling for age and stroke severity. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that shorter, more frequent early mobilization improves the chance of regaining independence after stroke. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4898313/ /pubmed/26888985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002459 Text en © 2016 American Academy of Neurology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Article
Bernhardt, Julie
Churilov, Leonid
Ellery, Fiona
Collier, Janice
Chamberlain, Jan
Langhorne, Peter
Lindley, Richard I.
Moodie, Marj
Dewey, Helen
Thrift, Amanda G.
Donnan, Geoff
Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT)
title Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT)
title_full Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT)
title_fullStr Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT)
title_full_unstemmed Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT)
title_short Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT)
title_sort prespecified dose-response analysis for a very early rehabilitation trial (avert)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002459
work_keys_str_mv AT bernhardtjulie prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert
AT churilovleonid prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert
AT elleryfiona prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert
AT collierjanice prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert
AT chamberlainjan prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert
AT langhornepeter prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert
AT lindleyrichardi prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert
AT moodiemarj prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert
AT deweyhelen prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert
AT thriftamandag prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert
AT donnangeoff prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert