Cargando…
Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT)
OBJECTIVE: Our prespecified dose-response analyses of A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) aim to provide practical guidance for clinicians on the timing, frequency, and amount of mobilization following acute stroke. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had confirmed first (or recurr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002459 |
_version_ | 1782436331330207744 |
---|---|
author | Bernhardt, Julie Churilov, Leonid Ellery, Fiona Collier, Janice Chamberlain, Jan Langhorne, Peter Lindley, Richard I. Moodie, Marj Dewey, Helen Thrift, Amanda G. Donnan, Geoff |
author_facet | Bernhardt, Julie Churilov, Leonid Ellery, Fiona Collier, Janice Chamberlain, Jan Langhorne, Peter Lindley, Richard I. Moodie, Marj Dewey, Helen Thrift, Amanda G. Donnan, Geoff |
author_sort | Bernhardt, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Our prespecified dose-response analyses of A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) aim to provide practical guidance for clinicians on the timing, frequency, and amount of mobilization following acute stroke. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had confirmed first (or recurrent) stroke, and were admitted to a stroke unit within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were randomized to receive very early and frequent mobilization, commencing within 24 hours, or usual care. We used regression analyses and Classification and Regression Trees (CART) to investigate the effect of timing and dose of mobilization on efficacy and safety outcomes, irrespective of assigned treatment group. RESULTS: A total of 2,104 patients were enrolled, of whom 2,083 (99.0%) were followed up at 3 months. We found a consistent pattern of improved odds of favorable outcome in efficacy and safety outcomes with increased daily frequency of out-of-bed sessions (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 1.18, p < 0.001), keeping time to first mobilization and mobilization amount constant. Increased amount (minutes per day) of mobilization reduced the odds of a good outcome (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.97, p < 0.001). Session frequency was the most important variable in the CART analysis, after prognostic variables age and baseline stroke severity. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that shorter, more frequent mobilization early after acute stroke is associated with greater odds of favorable outcome at 3 months when controlling for age and stroke severity. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that shorter, more frequent early mobilization improves the chance of regaining independence after stroke. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4898313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48983132016-06-22 Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) Bernhardt, Julie Churilov, Leonid Ellery, Fiona Collier, Janice Chamberlain, Jan Langhorne, Peter Lindley, Richard I. Moodie, Marj Dewey, Helen Thrift, Amanda G. Donnan, Geoff Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: Our prespecified dose-response analyses of A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) aim to provide practical guidance for clinicians on the timing, frequency, and amount of mobilization following acute stroke. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had confirmed first (or recurrent) stroke, and were admitted to a stroke unit within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were randomized to receive very early and frequent mobilization, commencing within 24 hours, or usual care. We used regression analyses and Classification and Regression Trees (CART) to investigate the effect of timing and dose of mobilization on efficacy and safety outcomes, irrespective of assigned treatment group. RESULTS: A total of 2,104 patients were enrolled, of whom 2,083 (99.0%) were followed up at 3 months. We found a consistent pattern of improved odds of favorable outcome in efficacy and safety outcomes with increased daily frequency of out-of-bed sessions (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 1.18, p < 0.001), keeping time to first mobilization and mobilization amount constant. Increased amount (minutes per day) of mobilization reduced the odds of a good outcome (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.97, p < 0.001). Session frequency was the most important variable in the CART analysis, after prognostic variables age and baseline stroke severity. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that shorter, more frequent mobilization early after acute stroke is associated with greater odds of favorable outcome at 3 months when controlling for age and stroke severity. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that shorter, more frequent early mobilization improves the chance of regaining independence after stroke. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4898313/ /pubmed/26888985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002459 Text en © 2016 American Academy of Neurology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Article Bernhardt, Julie Churilov, Leonid Ellery, Fiona Collier, Janice Chamberlain, Jan Langhorne, Peter Lindley, Richard I. Moodie, Marj Dewey, Helen Thrift, Amanda G. Donnan, Geoff Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) |
title | Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) |
title_full | Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) |
title_fullStr | Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) |
title_short | Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) |
title_sort | prespecified dose-response analysis for a very early rehabilitation trial (avert) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002459 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernhardtjulie prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert AT churilovleonid prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert AT elleryfiona prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert AT collierjanice prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert AT chamberlainjan prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert AT langhornepeter prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert AT lindleyrichardi prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert AT moodiemarj prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert AT deweyhelen prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert AT thriftamandag prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert AT donnangeoff prespecifieddoseresponseanalysisforaveryearlyrehabilitationtrialavert |