Cargando…
A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway
BACKGROUND: Education, regulation and association (ERA) are the supporting pillars of an enabling environment for midwives to provide quality care. This study explores these three pillars in the 73 low- and middle-income countries who participated in the State of the World’s Midwifery (SoWMy) 2014 r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27278786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-016-0134-7 |
_version_ | 1782436340133003264 |
---|---|
author | Castro Lopes, Sofia Nove, Andrea ten Hoope-Bender, Petra de Bernis, Luc Bokosi, Martha Moyo, Nester T. Homer, Caroline S. E. |
author_facet | Castro Lopes, Sofia Nove, Andrea ten Hoope-Bender, Petra de Bernis, Luc Bokosi, Martha Moyo, Nester T. Homer, Caroline S. E. |
author_sort | Castro Lopes, Sofia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Education, regulation and association (ERA) are the supporting pillars of an enabling environment for midwives to provide quality care. This study explores these three pillars in the 73 low- and middle-income countries who participated in the State of the World’s Midwifery (SoWMy) 2014 report. It also examines the progress made since the previous report in 2011. METHODS: A self-completion questionnaire collected quantitative and qualitative data on ERA characteristics and organisation in the 73 countries. The countries were grouped according to World Health Organization (WHO) regions. A descriptive analysis was conducted. RESULTS: In 82% of the participating countries, the minimum education level requirement to start midwifery training was grade 12 or above. The average length of training was higher for direct-entry programmes at 3.1 years than for post-nursing/healthcare provider programmes at 1.9 years. The median number of supervised births that must be conducted before graduation was 33 (range 0 to 240). Fewer than half of the countries had legislation recognising midwifery as an independent profession. This legislation was particularly lacking in the Western Pacific and South-East Asia regions. In most (90%) of the participating countries, governments were reported to have a regulatory role, but some reported challenges to the role being performed effectively. Professional associations were widely available to midwives in all regions although not all were exclusive to midwives. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the 2011 SoWMy report, there is evidence of increasing effort in low- and middle-income countries to improve midwifery education, to strengthen the profession and to follow international ERA standards and guidelines. However, not all elements are being implemented equally; some variability persists between and within regions. The education pillar showed more systematic improvement in the type of programme and length of training. The reinforcement of regulation through the development of legislation for midwifery, a recognised definition and the strengthening of midwives’ associations would benefit the development of other ERA elements and the profession generally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4898359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48983592016-06-09 A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway Castro Lopes, Sofia Nove, Andrea ten Hoope-Bender, Petra de Bernis, Luc Bokosi, Martha Moyo, Nester T. Homer, Caroline S. E. Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: Education, regulation and association (ERA) are the supporting pillars of an enabling environment for midwives to provide quality care. This study explores these three pillars in the 73 low- and middle-income countries who participated in the State of the World’s Midwifery (SoWMy) 2014 report. It also examines the progress made since the previous report in 2011. METHODS: A self-completion questionnaire collected quantitative and qualitative data on ERA characteristics and organisation in the 73 countries. The countries were grouped according to World Health Organization (WHO) regions. A descriptive analysis was conducted. RESULTS: In 82% of the participating countries, the minimum education level requirement to start midwifery training was grade 12 or above. The average length of training was higher for direct-entry programmes at 3.1 years than for post-nursing/healthcare provider programmes at 1.9 years. The median number of supervised births that must be conducted before graduation was 33 (range 0 to 240). Fewer than half of the countries had legislation recognising midwifery as an independent profession. This legislation was particularly lacking in the Western Pacific and South-East Asia regions. In most (90%) of the participating countries, governments were reported to have a regulatory role, but some reported challenges to the role being performed effectively. Professional associations were widely available to midwives in all regions although not all were exclusive to midwives. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the 2011 SoWMy report, there is evidence of increasing effort in low- and middle-income countries to improve midwifery education, to strengthen the profession and to follow international ERA standards and guidelines. However, not all elements are being implemented equally; some variability persists between and within regions. The education pillar showed more systematic improvement in the type of programme and length of training. The reinforcement of regulation through the development of legislation for midwifery, a recognised definition and the strengthening of midwives’ associations would benefit the development of other ERA elements and the profession generally. BioMed Central 2016-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4898359/ /pubmed/27278786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-016-0134-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Castro Lopes, Sofia Nove, Andrea ten Hoope-Bender, Petra de Bernis, Luc Bokosi, Martha Moyo, Nester T. Homer, Caroline S. E. A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway |
title | A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway |
title_full | A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway |
title_fullStr | A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway |
title_full_unstemmed | A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway |
title_short | A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway |
title_sort | descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27278786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-016-0134-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT castrolopessofia adescriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT noveandrea adescriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT tenhoopebenderpetra adescriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT debernisluc adescriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT bokosimartha adescriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT moyonestert adescriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT homercarolinese adescriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT castrolopessofia descriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT noveandrea descriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT tenhoopebenderpetra descriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT debernisluc descriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT bokosimartha descriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT moyonestert descriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway AT homercarolinese descriptiveanalysisofmidwiferyeducationregulationandassociationin73countriesthebaselineforapost2015pathway |