Cargando…
The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy
Background: The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Dynamic Interspinous Spacer (Coflex®) and Static Spacer (X-STOP ®) compared to Laminectomy (LAMI) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: A decision-analysis model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iran University of Medical Sciences
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390709 |
_version_ | 1782436400927342592 |
---|---|
author | Yaghoubi, Mohsen Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar Moradi-Joo, Mohammad Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa Zamani, Neda Naghibzadeh-Tahami, Ahmad |
author_facet | Yaghoubi, Mohsen Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar Moradi-Joo, Mohammad Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa Zamani, Neda Naghibzadeh-Tahami, Ahmad |
author_sort | Yaghoubi, Mohsen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Dynamic Interspinous Spacer (Coflex®) and Static Spacer (X-STOP ®) compared to Laminectomy (LAMI) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: A decision-analysis model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness. The effectiveness parameters were obtained from a systematic literature review in relevant databases including PUBMED and EMBASE. A meta-analysis was performed using the STATA statistical package and a random model was used to collect measures of mean difference of visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score before and after intervention in X-stop, Coflex and LAMI (95% confidence intervals). Cost data were obtained from provider and associated literature based on health care provider prospective. We assumed that the probability of the success rate of surgery in each intervention from associated literature and calculated Incremental cost effectiveness ratio. A one-way sensitivity analysis was also carried out. Results: Twenty-four out of 294 studies are included in the Meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimate of the mean difference of VAS pain score were 3.49 (95% CI 3.7-4.2) and 4.14 (95% CI 3.09- 5.19) for X-stop and Coflex, respectively. In addition, we assumed the overall pooled estimate of 5.3 (95% CI 2.15-7.4) on the basis of literature for LAMI. The average cost per LAMI surgery, X-stop and Coflex was US$ 3019, US$ 2022 and US$ 2566, respectively. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio of X-stop and Coflex versus LAMI was US$ 665.9 and US$ 780.7, respectively. Conclusion: Static Interspinous Spacer (X-stop) appears to be the most cost-effective treatment strategy in base case scenario with success rate of LAMI (range between (55%-70%). A sensitivity analysis shows that the increase probability of success rate of LAMI was more than 70 % and less than 55% which lead to the cost effectiveness of the Coflex intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4898842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Iran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48988422016-07-07 The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy Yaghoubi, Mohsen Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar Moradi-Joo, Mohammad Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa Zamani, Neda Naghibzadeh-Tahami, Ahmad Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Dynamic Interspinous Spacer (Coflex®) and Static Spacer (X-STOP ®) compared to Laminectomy (LAMI) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: A decision-analysis model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness. The effectiveness parameters were obtained from a systematic literature review in relevant databases including PUBMED and EMBASE. A meta-analysis was performed using the STATA statistical package and a random model was used to collect measures of mean difference of visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score before and after intervention in X-stop, Coflex and LAMI (95% confidence intervals). Cost data were obtained from provider and associated literature based on health care provider prospective. We assumed that the probability of the success rate of surgery in each intervention from associated literature and calculated Incremental cost effectiveness ratio. A one-way sensitivity analysis was also carried out. Results: Twenty-four out of 294 studies are included in the Meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimate of the mean difference of VAS pain score were 3.49 (95% CI 3.7-4.2) and 4.14 (95% CI 3.09- 5.19) for X-stop and Coflex, respectively. In addition, we assumed the overall pooled estimate of 5.3 (95% CI 2.15-7.4) on the basis of literature for LAMI. The average cost per LAMI surgery, X-stop and Coflex was US$ 3019, US$ 2022 and US$ 2566, respectively. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio of X-stop and Coflex versus LAMI was US$ 665.9 and US$ 780.7, respectively. Conclusion: Static Interspinous Spacer (X-stop) appears to be the most cost-effective treatment strategy in base case scenario with success rate of LAMI (range between (55%-70%). A sensitivity analysis shows that the increase probability of success rate of LAMI was more than 70 % and less than 55% which lead to the cost effectiveness of the Coflex intervention. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2016-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4898842/ /pubmed/27390709 Text en © 2016 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yaghoubi, Mohsen Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar Moradi-Joo, Mohammad Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa Zamani, Neda Naghibzadeh-Tahami, Ahmad The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy |
title | The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy |
title_full | The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy |
title_fullStr | The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy |
title_short | The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy |
title_sort | cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390709 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yaghoubimohsen thecosteffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy AT moradilakehmaziar thecosteffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy AT moradijoomohammad thecosteffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy AT rahimimovagharvafa thecosteffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy AT zamanineda thecosteffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy AT naghibzadehtahamiahmad thecosteffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy AT yaghoubimohsen costeffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy AT moradilakehmaziar costeffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy AT moradijoomohammad costeffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy AT rahimimovagharvafa costeffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy AT zamanineda costeffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy AT naghibzadehtahamiahmad costeffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy |