Cargando…

The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy

Background: The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Dynamic Interspinous Spacer (Coflex®) and Static Spacer (X-STOP ®) compared to Laminectomy (LAMI) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: A decision-analysis model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaghoubi, Mohsen, Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar, Moradi-Joo, Mohammad, Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa, Zamani, Neda, Naghibzadeh-Tahami, Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390709
_version_ 1782436400927342592
author Yaghoubi, Mohsen
Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar
Moradi-Joo, Mohammad
Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa
Zamani, Neda
Naghibzadeh-Tahami, Ahmad
author_facet Yaghoubi, Mohsen
Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar
Moradi-Joo, Mohammad
Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa
Zamani, Neda
Naghibzadeh-Tahami, Ahmad
author_sort Yaghoubi, Mohsen
collection PubMed
description Background: The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Dynamic Interspinous Spacer (Coflex®) and Static Spacer (X-STOP ®) compared to Laminectomy (LAMI) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: A decision-analysis model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness. The effectiveness parameters were obtained from a systematic literature review in relevant databases including PUBMED and EMBASE. A meta-analysis was performed using the STATA statistical package and a random model was used to collect measures of mean difference of visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score before and after intervention in X-stop, Coflex and LAMI (95% confidence intervals). Cost data were obtained from provider and associated literature based on health care provider prospective. We assumed that the probability of the success rate of surgery in each intervention from associated literature and calculated Incremental cost effectiveness ratio. A one-way sensitivity analysis was also carried out. Results: Twenty-four out of 294 studies are included in the Meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimate of the mean difference of VAS pain score were 3.49 (95% CI 3.7-4.2) and 4.14 (95% CI 3.09- 5.19) for X-stop and Coflex, respectively. In addition, we assumed the overall pooled estimate of 5.3 (95% CI 2.15-7.4) on the basis of literature for LAMI. The average cost per LAMI surgery, X-stop and Coflex was US$ 3019, US$ 2022 and US$ 2566, respectively. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio of X-stop and Coflex versus LAMI was US$ 665.9 and US$ 780.7, respectively. Conclusion: Static Interspinous Spacer (X-stop) appears to be the most cost-effective treatment strategy in base case scenario with success rate of LAMI (range between (55%-70%). A sensitivity analysis shows that the increase probability of success rate of LAMI was more than 70 % and less than 55% which lead to the cost effectiveness of the Coflex intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4898842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48988422016-07-07 The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy Yaghoubi, Mohsen Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar Moradi-Joo, Mohammad Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa Zamani, Neda Naghibzadeh-Tahami, Ahmad Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Dynamic Interspinous Spacer (Coflex®) and Static Spacer (X-STOP ®) compared to Laminectomy (LAMI) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: A decision-analysis model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness. The effectiveness parameters were obtained from a systematic literature review in relevant databases including PUBMED and EMBASE. A meta-analysis was performed using the STATA statistical package and a random model was used to collect measures of mean difference of visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score before and after intervention in X-stop, Coflex and LAMI (95% confidence intervals). Cost data were obtained from provider and associated literature based on health care provider prospective. We assumed that the probability of the success rate of surgery in each intervention from associated literature and calculated Incremental cost effectiveness ratio. A one-way sensitivity analysis was also carried out. Results: Twenty-four out of 294 studies are included in the Meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimate of the mean difference of VAS pain score were 3.49 (95% CI 3.7-4.2) and 4.14 (95% CI 3.09- 5.19) for X-stop and Coflex, respectively. In addition, we assumed the overall pooled estimate of 5.3 (95% CI 2.15-7.4) on the basis of literature for LAMI. The average cost per LAMI surgery, X-stop and Coflex was US$ 3019, US$ 2022 and US$ 2566, respectively. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio of X-stop and Coflex versus LAMI was US$ 665.9 and US$ 780.7, respectively. Conclusion: Static Interspinous Spacer (X-stop) appears to be the most cost-effective treatment strategy in base case scenario with success rate of LAMI (range between (55%-70%). A sensitivity analysis shows that the increase probability of success rate of LAMI was more than 70 % and less than 55% which lead to the cost effectiveness of the Coflex intervention. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2016-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4898842/ /pubmed/27390709 Text en © 2016 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yaghoubi, Mohsen
Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar
Moradi-Joo, Mohammad
Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa
Zamani, Neda
Naghibzadeh-Tahami, Ahmad
The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy
title The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy
title_full The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy
title_fullStr The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy
title_full_unstemmed The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy
title_short The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy
title_sort cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390709
work_keys_str_mv AT yaghoubimohsen thecosteffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy
AT moradilakehmaziar thecosteffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy
AT moradijoomohammad thecosteffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy
AT rahimimovagharvafa thecosteffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy
AT zamanineda thecosteffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy
AT naghibzadehtahamiahmad thecosteffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy
AT yaghoubimohsen costeffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy
AT moradilakehmaziar costeffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy
AT moradijoomohammad costeffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy
AT rahimimovagharvafa costeffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy
AT zamanineda costeffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy
AT naghibzadehtahamiahmad costeffectivenessofdynamicandstaticinterspinousspacerforlumbarspinalstenosiscomparedwithlaminectomy