Cargando…

Economic evaluation of resistant major depressive disorder treatment in Iranian population: a comparison between repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with electroconvulsive

Background: It is estimated that major depression disorders constitute 8.2% of years lived with disability (YLDs) globally. The repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) are two relative common interventions to treat major depressive disorders, especiall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghiasvand, Hesam, Moradi- Joo, Mohammad, Abolhassani, Nazanin, Ravaghi, Hamid, Raygani, Seyed Mansoor, Mohabbat-Bahar, Sahar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390700
_version_ 1782436401621499904
author Ghiasvand, Hesam
Moradi- Joo, Mohammad
Abolhassani, Nazanin
Ravaghi, Hamid
Raygani, Seyed Mansoor
Mohabbat-Bahar, Sahar
author_facet Ghiasvand, Hesam
Moradi- Joo, Mohammad
Abolhassani, Nazanin
Ravaghi, Hamid
Raygani, Seyed Mansoor
Mohabbat-Bahar, Sahar
author_sort Ghiasvand, Hesam
collection PubMed
description Background: It is estimated that major depression disorders constitute 8.2% of years lived with disability (YLDs) globally. The repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) are two relative common interventions to treat major depressive disorders, especially for treatment resistant depression. In this study the cost- effectiveness and cost-utility of rTMS were compared with ECT in Iranian population suffering from major depressive disorder using a decision tree model. Methods: A decision tree model conducted to compare the cost-effectiveness ratio of rTMS with ECT in a health system prospective and 7 months’ time horizon. The outcome variables were: response rate, remission rate and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of the rTMS and ECT as primary and secondary outcomes extracted from systematic reviews and randomized control trials. The costs were also calculated through a field study in one clinic and one hospital; the direct costs have only been considered. Results: The total cost for rTMS and ECTstrategieswere11015000Rials (373US$) and 11742700 Rials (397.7US$), respectively. Also the rTMS/ECT ratio of costs per improved patients was 1194410Rials (40.5 US$); the ratio for costs per QALYs utility was 21017139 Rials (711.72 US$). The incremental cost- effectiveness ratio of rTMS versus ECT was 1194410 Rials (40.44 US$) after treatment and maintenance courses. Conclusion: Given the current prevalence of depressive disorders in Iranian population, the ECT is more cost-effective than TMS. The sensitivity analysis showed that if the prevalence of major depressive disorders declines to below 5% or the costs of rTMS decrease (rTMS provided by public sector), then the rTMS becomes more cost-effective compared with ECT. However, efficacy of rTMS depends on the frequency of pulsed magnetic field, the location of rTMS on the head, the number of therapeutic sessions and the length of each session.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4898845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48988452016-07-07 Economic evaluation of resistant major depressive disorder treatment in Iranian population: a comparison between repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with electroconvulsive Ghiasvand, Hesam Moradi- Joo, Mohammad Abolhassani, Nazanin Ravaghi, Hamid Raygani, Seyed Mansoor Mohabbat-Bahar, Sahar Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: It is estimated that major depression disorders constitute 8.2% of years lived with disability (YLDs) globally. The repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) are two relative common interventions to treat major depressive disorders, especially for treatment resistant depression. In this study the cost- effectiveness and cost-utility of rTMS were compared with ECT in Iranian population suffering from major depressive disorder using a decision tree model. Methods: A decision tree model conducted to compare the cost-effectiveness ratio of rTMS with ECT in a health system prospective and 7 months’ time horizon. The outcome variables were: response rate, remission rate and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of the rTMS and ECT as primary and secondary outcomes extracted from systematic reviews and randomized control trials. The costs were also calculated through a field study in one clinic and one hospital; the direct costs have only been considered. Results: The total cost for rTMS and ECTstrategieswere11015000Rials (373US$) and 11742700 Rials (397.7US$), respectively. Also the rTMS/ECT ratio of costs per improved patients was 1194410Rials (40.5 US$); the ratio for costs per QALYs utility was 21017139 Rials (711.72 US$). The incremental cost- effectiveness ratio of rTMS versus ECT was 1194410 Rials (40.44 US$) after treatment and maintenance courses. Conclusion: Given the current prevalence of depressive disorders in Iranian population, the ECT is more cost-effective than TMS. The sensitivity analysis showed that if the prevalence of major depressive disorders declines to below 5% or the costs of rTMS decrease (rTMS provided by public sector), then the rTMS becomes more cost-effective compared with ECT. However, efficacy of rTMS depends on the frequency of pulsed magnetic field, the location of rTMS on the head, the number of therapeutic sessions and the length of each session. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2016-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4898845/ /pubmed/27390700 Text en © 2016 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghiasvand, Hesam
Moradi- Joo, Mohammad
Abolhassani, Nazanin
Ravaghi, Hamid
Raygani, Seyed Mansoor
Mohabbat-Bahar, Sahar
Economic evaluation of resistant major depressive disorder treatment in Iranian population: a comparison between repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with electroconvulsive
title Economic evaluation of resistant major depressive disorder treatment in Iranian population: a comparison between repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with electroconvulsive
title_full Economic evaluation of resistant major depressive disorder treatment in Iranian population: a comparison between repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with electroconvulsive
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of resistant major depressive disorder treatment in Iranian population: a comparison between repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with electroconvulsive
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of resistant major depressive disorder treatment in Iranian population: a comparison between repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with electroconvulsive
title_short Economic evaluation of resistant major depressive disorder treatment in Iranian population: a comparison between repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with electroconvulsive
title_sort economic evaluation of resistant major depressive disorder treatment in iranian population: a comparison between repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroconvulsive
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390700
work_keys_str_mv AT ghiasvandhesam economicevaluationofresistantmajordepressivedisordertreatmentiniranianpopulationacomparisonbetweenrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationwithelectroconvulsive
AT moradijoomohammad economicevaluationofresistantmajordepressivedisordertreatmentiniranianpopulationacomparisonbetweenrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationwithelectroconvulsive
AT abolhassaninazanin economicevaluationofresistantmajordepressivedisordertreatmentiniranianpopulationacomparisonbetweenrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationwithelectroconvulsive
AT ravaghihamid economicevaluationofresistantmajordepressivedisordertreatmentiniranianpopulationacomparisonbetweenrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationwithelectroconvulsive
AT rayganiseyedmansoor economicevaluationofresistantmajordepressivedisordertreatmentiniranianpopulationacomparisonbetweenrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationwithelectroconvulsive
AT mohabbatbaharsahar economicevaluationofresistantmajordepressivedisordertreatmentiniranianpopulationacomparisonbetweenrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationwithelectroconvulsive