Cargando…

The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence

Background: In the recent years, using health technologies to diagnose and treat diseases has had a considerable and accelerated growth. The proper use of these technologies may considerably help in the diagnosis and treatment of different diseases. On the other hand, unlimited and unrestricted entr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mobinizadeh, Mohammadreza, Raeissi, Pouran, Nasiripour, Amir Ashkan, Olyaeemanesh, Alireza, Tabibi, Seyed Jamaleddin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390699
_version_ 1782436403468042240
author Mobinizadeh, Mohammadreza
Raeissi, Pouran
Nasiripour, Amir Ashkan
Olyaeemanesh, Alireza
Tabibi, Seyed Jamaleddin
author_facet Mobinizadeh, Mohammadreza
Raeissi, Pouran
Nasiripour, Amir Ashkan
Olyaeemanesh, Alireza
Tabibi, Seyed Jamaleddin
author_sort Mobinizadeh, Mohammadreza
collection PubMed
description Background: In the recent years, using health technologies to diagnose and treat diseases has had a considerable and accelerated growth. The proper use of these technologies may considerably help in the diagnosis and treatment of different diseases. On the other hand, unlimited and unrestricted entry of these technologies may result in induced demand by service providers. The aim of this study was to determine the appropriate criteria used in health technologies priority-setting models in the world. Methods: Using MESH and free text, we sought and retrieved the relevant articles from the most appropriate medical databases (the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Scopus) through three separate search strategies up to March 2015. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) Studies with specific criteria; 2) Articles written in English; 3) Those articles conducted in compliance with priority setting of health technologies. Data were analyzed qualitatively using a thematic synthesis technique. Results: After screening the retrieved papers via PRISMA framework, from the 7,012 papers, 40 studies were included in the final phase. Criteria for selecting health technologies (in pre assessment and in the assessment phase) were categorized into six main themes: 1) Health outcomes; 2) Disease and target population; 3) Technology alternatives; 4) Economic aspects; 5) Evidence; 6) and other factors. "Health effects/benefits" had the maximum frequency in health outcomes (8 studies); "disease severity" had the maximum frequency in disease and target population (12 studies); "the number of alternatives" had the maximum frequency in alternatives (2 studies); "cost-effectiveness" had the maximum frequency in economic aspects (15 studies); "quality of evidence" had the maximum frequency in evidence (4 studies); and "issues concerning the health system" had the maximum frequency in other factors (10 studies). Conclusion: The results revealed an increase in the number of studies on health technologies priority setting around the world, and emphasized the necessity of application of a multi- criteria approach for appropriate decision making about healthcare technologies in the health systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4898853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48988532016-07-07 The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence Mobinizadeh, Mohammadreza Raeissi, Pouran Nasiripour, Amir Ashkan Olyaeemanesh, Alireza Tabibi, Seyed Jamaleddin Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: In the recent years, using health technologies to diagnose and treat diseases has had a considerable and accelerated growth. The proper use of these technologies may considerably help in the diagnosis and treatment of different diseases. On the other hand, unlimited and unrestricted entry of these technologies may result in induced demand by service providers. The aim of this study was to determine the appropriate criteria used in health technologies priority-setting models in the world. Methods: Using MESH and free text, we sought and retrieved the relevant articles from the most appropriate medical databases (the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Scopus) through three separate search strategies up to March 2015. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) Studies with specific criteria; 2) Articles written in English; 3) Those articles conducted in compliance with priority setting of health technologies. Data were analyzed qualitatively using a thematic synthesis technique. Results: After screening the retrieved papers via PRISMA framework, from the 7,012 papers, 40 studies were included in the final phase. Criteria for selecting health technologies (in pre assessment and in the assessment phase) were categorized into six main themes: 1) Health outcomes; 2) Disease and target population; 3) Technology alternatives; 4) Economic aspects; 5) Evidence; 6) and other factors. "Health effects/benefits" had the maximum frequency in health outcomes (8 studies); "disease severity" had the maximum frequency in disease and target population (12 studies); "the number of alternatives" had the maximum frequency in alternatives (2 studies); "cost-effectiveness" had the maximum frequency in economic aspects (15 studies); "quality of evidence" had the maximum frequency in evidence (4 studies); and "issues concerning the health system" had the maximum frequency in other factors (10 studies). Conclusion: The results revealed an increase in the number of studies on health technologies priority setting around the world, and emphasized the necessity of application of a multi- criteria approach for appropriate decision making about healthcare technologies in the health systems. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2016-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4898853/ /pubmed/27390699 Text en © 2016 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mobinizadeh, Mohammadreza
Raeissi, Pouran
Nasiripour, Amir Ashkan
Olyaeemanesh, Alireza
Tabibi, Seyed Jamaleddin
The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence
title The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence
title_full The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence
title_fullStr The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence
title_full_unstemmed The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence
title_short The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence
title_sort health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: a systematic review of the current evidence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390699
work_keys_str_mv AT mobinizadehmohammadreza thehealthsystemsprioritysettingcriteriaforselectinghealthtechnologiesasystematicreviewofthecurrentevidence
AT raeissipouran thehealthsystemsprioritysettingcriteriaforselectinghealthtechnologiesasystematicreviewofthecurrentevidence
AT nasiripouramirashkan thehealthsystemsprioritysettingcriteriaforselectinghealthtechnologiesasystematicreviewofthecurrentevidence
AT olyaeemaneshalireza thehealthsystemsprioritysettingcriteriaforselectinghealthtechnologiesasystematicreviewofthecurrentevidence
AT tabibiseyedjamaleddin thehealthsystemsprioritysettingcriteriaforselectinghealthtechnologiesasystematicreviewofthecurrentevidence
AT mobinizadehmohammadreza healthsystemsprioritysettingcriteriaforselectinghealthtechnologiesasystematicreviewofthecurrentevidence
AT raeissipouran healthsystemsprioritysettingcriteriaforselectinghealthtechnologiesasystematicreviewofthecurrentevidence
AT nasiripouramirashkan healthsystemsprioritysettingcriteriaforselectinghealthtechnologiesasystematicreviewofthecurrentevidence
AT olyaeemaneshalireza healthsystemsprioritysettingcriteriaforselectinghealthtechnologiesasystematicreviewofthecurrentevidence
AT tabibiseyedjamaleddin healthsystemsprioritysettingcriteriaforselectinghealthtechnologiesasystematicreviewofthecurrentevidence