Cargando…
Open Science and Research Reproducibility
Many scientists, journals and funders are concerned about the low reproducibility of many scientific findings. One approach that may serve to improve the reliability and robustness of research is open science. Here I argue that the process of pre-registering study protocols, sharing study materials...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cancer Intelligence
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56 |
_version_ | 1782436417539932160 |
---|---|
author | Munafò, Marcus |
author_facet | Munafò, Marcus |
author_sort | Munafò, Marcus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many scientists, journals and funders are concerned about the low reproducibility of many scientific findings. One approach that may serve to improve the reliability and robustness of research is open science. Here I argue that the process of pre-registering study protocols, sharing study materials and data, and posting preprints of manuscripts may serve to improve quality control procedures at every stage of the research pipeline, and in turn improve the reproducibility of published work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4898932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Cancer Intelligence |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48989322016-06-27 Open Science and Research Reproducibility Munafò, Marcus Ecancermedicalscience Editorial Many scientists, journals and funders are concerned about the low reproducibility of many scientific findings. One approach that may serve to improve the reliability and robustness of research is open science. Here I argue that the process of pre-registering study protocols, sharing study materials and data, and posting preprints of manuscripts may serve to improve quality control procedures at every stage of the research pipeline, and in turn improve the reproducibility of published work. Cancer Intelligence 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4898932/ /pubmed/27350794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Munafò, Marcus Open Science and Research Reproducibility |
title | Open Science and Research Reproducibility |
title_full | Open Science and Research Reproducibility |
title_fullStr | Open Science and Research Reproducibility |
title_full_unstemmed | Open Science and Research Reproducibility |
title_short | Open Science and Research Reproducibility |
title_sort | open science and research reproducibility |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4898932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munafomarcus openscienceandresearchreproducibility |