Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis
Objectives. Systematic review of point of care (POC) diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV). Methods. Literature search on PubMed for articles from January 2010 to August 2015, including original re...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4899593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4386127 |
_version_ | 1782436489675669504 |
---|---|
author | Herbst de Cortina, Sasha Bristow, Claire C. Joseph Davey, Dvora Klausner, Jeffrey D. |
author_facet | Herbst de Cortina, Sasha Bristow, Claire C. Joseph Davey, Dvora Klausner, Jeffrey D. |
author_sort | Herbst de Cortina, Sasha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives. Systematic review of point of care (POC) diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV). Methods. Literature search on PubMed for articles from January 2010 to August 2015, including original research in English on POC diagnostics for sexually transmitted CT, NG, and/or TV. Results. We identified 33 publications with original research on POC diagnostics for CT, NG, and/or TV. Thirteen articles evaluated test performance, yielding at least one test for each infection with sensitivity and specificity ≥90%. Each infection also had currently available tests with sensitivities <60%. Three articles analyzed cost effectiveness, and five publications discussed acceptability and feasibility. POC testing was acceptable to both providers and patients and was also demonstrated to be cost effective. Fourteen proof of concept articles introduced new tests. Conclusions. Highly sensitive and specific POC tests are available for CT, NG, and TV, but improvement is possible. Future research should focus on acceptability, feasibility, and cost of POC testing. While pregnant women specifically have not been studied, the results available in nonpregnant populations are encouraging for the ability to test and treat women in antenatal care to prevent adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4899593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48995932016-06-16 A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis Herbst de Cortina, Sasha Bristow, Claire C. Joseph Davey, Dvora Klausner, Jeffrey D. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Review Article Objectives. Systematic review of point of care (POC) diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV). Methods. Literature search on PubMed for articles from January 2010 to August 2015, including original research in English on POC diagnostics for sexually transmitted CT, NG, and/or TV. Results. We identified 33 publications with original research on POC diagnostics for CT, NG, and/or TV. Thirteen articles evaluated test performance, yielding at least one test for each infection with sensitivity and specificity ≥90%. Each infection also had currently available tests with sensitivities <60%. Three articles analyzed cost effectiveness, and five publications discussed acceptability and feasibility. POC testing was acceptable to both providers and patients and was also demonstrated to be cost effective. Fourteen proof of concept articles introduced new tests. Conclusions. Highly sensitive and specific POC tests are available for CT, NG, and TV, but improvement is possible. Future research should focus on acceptability, feasibility, and cost of POC testing. While pregnant women specifically have not been studied, the results available in nonpregnant populations are encouraging for the ability to test and treat women in antenatal care to prevent adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4899593/ /pubmed/27313440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4386127 Text en Copyright © 2016 Sasha Herbst de Cortina et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Herbst de Cortina, Sasha Bristow, Claire C. Joseph Davey, Dvora Klausner, Jeffrey D. A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis |
title | A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis
|
title_full | A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis
|
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis
|
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis
|
title_short | A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis
|
title_sort | systematic review of point of care testing for chlamydia trachomatis, neisseria gonorrhoeae, and trichomonas vaginalis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4899593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4386127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herbstdecortinasasha asystematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis AT bristowclairec asystematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis AT josephdaveydvora asystematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis AT klausnerjeffreyd asystematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis AT herbstdecortinasasha systematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis AT bristowclairec systematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis AT josephdaveydvora systematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis AT klausnerjeffreyd systematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis |