Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis

Objectives. Systematic review of point of care (POC) diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV). Methods. Literature search on PubMed for articles from January 2010 to August 2015, including original re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herbst de Cortina, Sasha, Bristow, Claire C., Joseph Davey, Dvora, Klausner, Jeffrey D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4899593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4386127
_version_ 1782436489675669504
author Herbst de Cortina, Sasha
Bristow, Claire C.
Joseph Davey, Dvora
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
author_facet Herbst de Cortina, Sasha
Bristow, Claire C.
Joseph Davey, Dvora
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
author_sort Herbst de Cortina, Sasha
collection PubMed
description Objectives. Systematic review of point of care (POC) diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV). Methods. Literature search on PubMed for articles from January 2010 to August 2015, including original research in English on POC diagnostics for sexually transmitted CT, NG, and/or TV. Results. We identified 33 publications with original research on POC diagnostics for CT, NG, and/or TV. Thirteen articles evaluated test performance, yielding at least one test for each infection with sensitivity and specificity ≥90%. Each infection also had currently available tests with sensitivities <60%. Three articles analyzed cost effectiveness, and five publications discussed acceptability and feasibility. POC testing was acceptable to both providers and patients and was also demonstrated to be cost effective. Fourteen proof of concept articles introduced new tests. Conclusions. Highly sensitive and specific POC tests are available for CT, NG, and TV, but improvement is possible. Future research should focus on acceptability, feasibility, and cost of POC testing. While pregnant women specifically have not been studied, the results available in nonpregnant populations are encouraging for the ability to test and treat women in antenatal care to prevent adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4899593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48995932016-06-16 A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis Herbst de Cortina, Sasha Bristow, Claire C. Joseph Davey, Dvora Klausner, Jeffrey D. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Review Article Objectives. Systematic review of point of care (POC) diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV). Methods. Literature search on PubMed for articles from January 2010 to August 2015, including original research in English on POC diagnostics for sexually transmitted CT, NG, and/or TV. Results. We identified 33 publications with original research on POC diagnostics for CT, NG, and/or TV. Thirteen articles evaluated test performance, yielding at least one test for each infection with sensitivity and specificity ≥90%. Each infection also had currently available tests with sensitivities <60%. Three articles analyzed cost effectiveness, and five publications discussed acceptability and feasibility. POC testing was acceptable to both providers and patients and was also demonstrated to be cost effective. Fourteen proof of concept articles introduced new tests. Conclusions. Highly sensitive and specific POC tests are available for CT, NG, and TV, but improvement is possible. Future research should focus on acceptability, feasibility, and cost of POC testing. While pregnant women specifically have not been studied, the results available in nonpregnant populations are encouraging for the ability to test and treat women in antenatal care to prevent adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4899593/ /pubmed/27313440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4386127 Text en Copyright © 2016 Sasha Herbst de Cortina et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Herbst de Cortina, Sasha
Bristow, Claire C.
Joseph Davey, Dvora
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis
title A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis
title_full A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis
title_short A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis
title_sort systematic review of point of care testing for chlamydia trachomatis, neisseria gonorrhoeae, and trichomonas vaginalis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4899593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4386127
work_keys_str_mv AT herbstdecortinasasha asystematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis
AT bristowclairec asystematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis
AT josephdaveydvora asystematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis
AT klausnerjeffreyd asystematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis
AT herbstdecortinasasha systematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis
AT bristowclairec systematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis
AT josephdaveydvora systematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis
AT klausnerjeffreyd systematicreviewofpointofcaretestingforchlamydiatrachomatisneisseriagonorrhoeaeandtrichomonasvaginalis