Cargando…

Prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2 to IIB submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

This study was designed to develop a risk model for disease recurrence among cervical cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery. Data for 853 patients were obtained from a retrospective study and used to train the model, and then data for 447 patients from a prospect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Kecheng, Sun, Haiying, Li, Xiong, Hu, Ting, Yang, Ru, Wang, ShaoShuai, Jia, Yao, Chen, Zhilan, Tang, Fangxu, Shen, Jian, Qin, Xiaomin, Zhou, Hang, Yang, Runfeng, Gui, Juan, Wang, Lin, Zhao, Xiaolin, Zhang, Jincheng, Liu, Jiong, Guo, Lili, Li, Shuang, Wang, Shixuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4899714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27279023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep27568
_version_ 1782436515728588800
author Huang, Kecheng
Sun, Haiying
Li, Xiong
Hu, Ting
Yang, Ru
Wang, ShaoShuai
Jia, Yao
Chen, Zhilan
Tang, Fangxu
Shen, Jian
Qin, Xiaomin
Zhou, Hang
Yang, Runfeng
Gui, Juan
Wang, Lin
Zhao, Xiaolin
Zhang, Jincheng
Liu, Jiong
Guo, Lili
Li, Shuang
Wang, Shixuan
author_facet Huang, Kecheng
Sun, Haiying
Li, Xiong
Hu, Ting
Yang, Ru
Wang, ShaoShuai
Jia, Yao
Chen, Zhilan
Tang, Fangxu
Shen, Jian
Qin, Xiaomin
Zhou, Hang
Yang, Runfeng
Gui, Juan
Wang, Lin
Zhao, Xiaolin
Zhang, Jincheng
Liu, Jiong
Guo, Lili
Li, Shuang
Wang, Shixuan
author_sort Huang, Kecheng
collection PubMed
description This study was designed to develop a risk model for disease recurrence among cervical cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery. Data for 853 patients were obtained from a retrospective study and used to train the model, and then data for 447 patients from a prospective cohort study were employed to validate the model. The Cox regression model was used for calculating the coefficients of the risk factors. According to risk scores, patients were classified into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups. There were 49 (49/144, 34%) recurrences observed in the high-risk group (with a risk score ≥ 2.65), compared with 3 (3/142, 2%) recurrences in the low-risk group (with a risk score < 0.90). Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly different (log-rank p < 0.001) among the three risk groups; the risk model also revealed a significant increase in the accuracy of predicting 5-year DFS with the area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.754 for risk model vs 0.679 for FIGO stage system); the risk model was also validated with data from the prospective study (log-rank p < 0.001, AUC = 0.766). Both high-risk and intermediate-risk patients can be more effectively identified by this risk model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4899714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48997142016-06-13 Prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2 to IIB submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy Huang, Kecheng Sun, Haiying Li, Xiong Hu, Ting Yang, Ru Wang, ShaoShuai Jia, Yao Chen, Zhilan Tang, Fangxu Shen, Jian Qin, Xiaomin Zhou, Hang Yang, Runfeng Gui, Juan Wang, Lin Zhao, Xiaolin Zhang, Jincheng Liu, Jiong Guo, Lili Li, Shuang Wang, Shixuan Sci Rep Article This study was designed to develop a risk model for disease recurrence among cervical cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery. Data for 853 patients were obtained from a retrospective study and used to train the model, and then data for 447 patients from a prospective cohort study were employed to validate the model. The Cox regression model was used for calculating the coefficients of the risk factors. According to risk scores, patients were classified into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups. There were 49 (49/144, 34%) recurrences observed in the high-risk group (with a risk score ≥ 2.65), compared with 3 (3/142, 2%) recurrences in the low-risk group (with a risk score < 0.90). Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly different (log-rank p < 0.001) among the three risk groups; the risk model also revealed a significant increase in the accuracy of predicting 5-year DFS with the area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.754 for risk model vs 0.679 for FIGO stage system); the risk model was also validated with data from the prospective study (log-rank p < 0.001, AUC = 0.766). Both high-risk and intermediate-risk patients can be more effectively identified by this risk model. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4899714/ /pubmed/27279023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep27568 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Huang, Kecheng
Sun, Haiying
Li, Xiong
Hu, Ting
Yang, Ru
Wang, ShaoShuai
Jia, Yao
Chen, Zhilan
Tang, Fangxu
Shen, Jian
Qin, Xiaomin
Zhou, Hang
Yang, Runfeng
Gui, Juan
Wang, Lin
Zhao, Xiaolin
Zhang, Jincheng
Liu, Jiong
Guo, Lili
Li, Shuang
Wang, Shixuan
Prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2 to IIB submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title Prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2 to IIB submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_full Prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2 to IIB submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_fullStr Prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2 to IIB submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2 to IIB submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_short Prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2 to IIB submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_sort prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage ib2 to iib submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4899714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27279023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep27568
work_keys_str_mv AT huangkecheng prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT sunhaiying prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT lixiong prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT huting prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT yangru prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT wangshaoshuai prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT jiayao prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT chenzhilan prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT tangfangxu prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT shenjian prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT qinxiaomin prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT zhouhang prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT yangrunfeng prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT guijuan prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT wanglin prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT zhaoxiaolin prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT zhangjincheng prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT liujiong prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT guolili prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT lishuang prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT wangshixuan prognosticriskmodeldevelopmentandprospectivevalidationamongpatientswithcervicalcancerstageib2toiibsubmittedtoneoadjuvantchemotherapy