Cargando…

Artificial sweeteners as a sugar substitute: Are they really safe?

Nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) have become an important part of everyday life and are increasingly used nowadays in a variety of dietary and medicinal products. They provide fewer calories and far more intense sweetness than sugar-containing products and are used by a plethora of population subsets f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Arun, Amarnath, S., Thulasimani, M., Ramaswamy, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4899993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27298490
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.182888
_version_ 1782436564561821696
author Sharma, Arun
Amarnath, S.
Thulasimani, M.
Ramaswamy, S.
author_facet Sharma, Arun
Amarnath, S.
Thulasimani, M.
Ramaswamy, S.
author_sort Sharma, Arun
collection PubMed
description Nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) have become an important part of everyday life and are increasingly used nowadays in a variety of dietary and medicinal products. They provide fewer calories and far more intense sweetness than sugar-containing products and are used by a plethora of population subsets for varying objectives. Six of these agents (aspartame, saccharine, sucralose, neotame, acesulfame-K, and stevia) have previously received a generally recognized as safe status from the United States Food and Drug Administration, and two more (Swingle fruit extract and advantame) have been added in the recent years to this ever growing list. They are claimed to promote weight loss and deemed safe for consumption by diabetics; however, there is inconclusive evidence to support most of their uses and some recent studies even hint that these earlier established benefits regarding NNS use might not be true. There is a lack of properly designed randomized controlled studies to assess their efficacy in different populations, whereas observational studies often remain confounded due to reverse causality and often yield opposite findings. Pregnant and lactating women, children, diabetics, migraine, and epilepsy patients represent the susceptible population to the adverse effects of NNS-containing products and should use these products with utmost caution. The overall use of NNS remains controversial, and consumers should be amply informed about the potential risks of using them, based on current evidence-based dietary guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4899993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48999932016-06-13 Artificial sweeteners as a sugar substitute: Are they really safe? Sharma, Arun Amarnath, S. Thulasimani, M. Ramaswamy, S. Indian J Pharmacol Educational Forum Nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) have become an important part of everyday life and are increasingly used nowadays in a variety of dietary and medicinal products. They provide fewer calories and far more intense sweetness than sugar-containing products and are used by a plethora of population subsets for varying objectives. Six of these agents (aspartame, saccharine, sucralose, neotame, acesulfame-K, and stevia) have previously received a generally recognized as safe status from the United States Food and Drug Administration, and two more (Swingle fruit extract and advantame) have been added in the recent years to this ever growing list. They are claimed to promote weight loss and deemed safe for consumption by diabetics; however, there is inconclusive evidence to support most of their uses and some recent studies even hint that these earlier established benefits regarding NNS use might not be true. There is a lack of properly designed randomized controlled studies to assess their efficacy in different populations, whereas observational studies often remain confounded due to reverse causality and often yield opposite findings. Pregnant and lactating women, children, diabetics, migraine, and epilepsy patients represent the susceptible population to the adverse effects of NNS-containing products and should use these products with utmost caution. The overall use of NNS remains controversial, and consumers should be amply informed about the potential risks of using them, based on current evidence-based dietary guidelines. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4899993/ /pubmed/27298490 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.182888 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Educational Forum
Sharma, Arun
Amarnath, S.
Thulasimani, M.
Ramaswamy, S.
Artificial sweeteners as a sugar substitute: Are they really safe?
title Artificial sweeteners as a sugar substitute: Are they really safe?
title_full Artificial sweeteners as a sugar substitute: Are they really safe?
title_fullStr Artificial sweeteners as a sugar substitute: Are they really safe?
title_full_unstemmed Artificial sweeteners as a sugar substitute: Are they really safe?
title_short Artificial sweeteners as a sugar substitute: Are they really safe?
title_sort artificial sweeteners as a sugar substitute: are they really safe?
topic Educational Forum
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4899993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27298490
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.182888
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaarun artificialsweetenersasasugarsubstitutearetheyreallysafe
AT amarnaths artificialsweetenersasasugarsubstitutearetheyreallysafe
AT thulasimanim artificialsweetenersasasugarsubstitutearetheyreallysafe
AT ramaswamys artificialsweetenersasasugarsubstitutearetheyreallysafe