Cargando…

From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript

Once a manuscript is submitted, the journal editor decides whether the manuscript merits further peer review, and the section editor or editor-in-chief reviews those comments and makes a decision that is conveyed to the corresponding author. Almost all accepted manuscripts require revisions of some...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhargava, Puneet, Agrawal, Garima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27330620
http://dx.doi.org/10.2484/rcr.v8i1.824
_version_ 1782436599977476096
author Bhargava, Puneet
Agrawal, Garima
author_facet Bhargava, Puneet
Agrawal, Garima
author_sort Bhargava, Puneet
collection PubMed
description Once a manuscript is submitted, the journal editor decides whether the manuscript merits further peer review, and the section editor or editor-in-chief reviews those comments and makes a decision that is conveyed to the corresponding author. Almost all accepted manuscripts require revisions of some kind. One of the good things about writing a case report is that it does not usually require major revisions; for the most part, comments can be addressed rather quickly with a few changes. The most common revisions requested are providing followup imaging information or additional laboratory/pathology information, shortening the length, and modifying sentences that boast of a major conclusion based on a single case. This article focuses on how to deal with the revision process so that it is smooth for both the author and the editor; and that it leads to a quick acceptance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4900210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49002102016-06-17 From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript Bhargava, Puneet Agrawal, Garima Radiol Case Rep Article Once a manuscript is submitted, the journal editor decides whether the manuscript merits further peer review, and the section editor or editor-in-chief reviews those comments and makes a decision that is conveyed to the corresponding author. Almost all accepted manuscripts require revisions of some kind. One of the good things about writing a case report is that it does not usually require major revisions; for the most part, comments can be addressed rather quickly with a few changes. The most common revisions requested are providing followup imaging information or additional laboratory/pathology information, shortening the length, and modifying sentences that boast of a major conclusion based on a single case. This article focuses on how to deal with the revision process so that it is smooth for both the author and the editor; and that it leads to a quick acceptance. Elsevier 2015-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4900210/ /pubmed/27330620 http://dx.doi.org/10.2484/rcr.v8i1.824 Text en © 2013 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bhargava, Puneet
Agrawal, Garima
From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript
title From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript
title_full From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript
title_fullStr From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript
title_full_unstemmed From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript
title_short From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript
title_sort from the editor's desk: a systematic guide to revising a manuscript
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27330620
http://dx.doi.org/10.2484/rcr.v8i1.824
work_keys_str_mv AT bhargavapuneet fromtheeditorsdeskasystematicguidetorevisingamanuscript
AT agrawalgarima fromtheeditorsdeskasystematicguidetorevisingamanuscript