Cargando…
From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript
Once a manuscript is submitted, the journal editor decides whether the manuscript merits further peer review, and the section editor or editor-in-chief reviews those comments and makes a decision that is conveyed to the corresponding author. Almost all accepted manuscripts require revisions of some...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27330620 http://dx.doi.org/10.2484/rcr.v8i1.824 |
_version_ | 1782436599977476096 |
---|---|
author | Bhargava, Puneet Agrawal, Garima |
author_facet | Bhargava, Puneet Agrawal, Garima |
author_sort | Bhargava, Puneet |
collection | PubMed |
description | Once a manuscript is submitted, the journal editor decides whether the manuscript merits further peer review, and the section editor or editor-in-chief reviews those comments and makes a decision that is conveyed to the corresponding author. Almost all accepted manuscripts require revisions of some kind. One of the good things about writing a case report is that it does not usually require major revisions; for the most part, comments can be addressed rather quickly with a few changes. The most common revisions requested are providing followup imaging information or additional laboratory/pathology information, shortening the length, and modifying sentences that boast of a major conclusion based on a single case. This article focuses on how to deal with the revision process so that it is smooth for both the author and the editor; and that it leads to a quick acceptance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4900210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49002102016-06-17 From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript Bhargava, Puneet Agrawal, Garima Radiol Case Rep Article Once a manuscript is submitted, the journal editor decides whether the manuscript merits further peer review, and the section editor or editor-in-chief reviews those comments and makes a decision that is conveyed to the corresponding author. Almost all accepted manuscripts require revisions of some kind. One of the good things about writing a case report is that it does not usually require major revisions; for the most part, comments can be addressed rather quickly with a few changes. The most common revisions requested are providing followup imaging information or additional laboratory/pathology information, shortening the length, and modifying sentences that boast of a major conclusion based on a single case. This article focuses on how to deal with the revision process so that it is smooth for both the author and the editor; and that it leads to a quick acceptance. Elsevier 2015-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4900210/ /pubmed/27330620 http://dx.doi.org/10.2484/rcr.v8i1.824 Text en © 2013 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bhargava, Puneet Agrawal, Garima From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript |
title | From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript |
title_full | From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript |
title_fullStr | From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript |
title_full_unstemmed | From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript |
title_short | From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript |
title_sort | from the editor's desk: a systematic guide to revising a manuscript |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27330620 http://dx.doi.org/10.2484/rcr.v8i1.824 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhargavapuneet fromtheeditorsdeskasystematicguidetorevisingamanuscript AT agrawalgarima fromtheeditorsdeskasystematicguidetorevisingamanuscript |