Cargando…

Transphyseal ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Does Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling Place the Physis at Greater Risk Compared With Transtibial Drilling?

BACKGROUND: Most studies examining the safety and efficacy of transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for skeletally immature patients utilize transtibial drilling. Independent femoral tunnel drilling may impart a different pattern of distal femoral physeal involvement. PURPOSE:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruz, Aristides I., Lakomkin, Nikita, Fabricant, Peter D., Lawrence, J. Todd R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
25
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27331075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116650432
_version_ 1782436612685168640
author Cruz, Aristides I.
Lakomkin, Nikita
Fabricant, Peter D.
Lawrence, J. Todd R.
author_facet Cruz, Aristides I.
Lakomkin, Nikita
Fabricant, Peter D.
Lawrence, J. Todd R.
author_sort Cruz, Aristides I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most studies examining the safety and efficacy of transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for skeletally immature patients utilize transtibial drilling. Independent femoral tunnel drilling may impart a different pattern of distal femoral physeal involvement. PURPOSE: To radiographically assess differences in distal femoral physeal disruption between transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling. We hypothesized that more oblique tunnels associated with independent drilling involve a significantly larger area of physeal disruption compared with vertically oriented tunnels. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We analyzed skeletally immature patients aged between 10 and 15 years who underwent transphyseal ACL reconstruction utilizing an independent femoral tunnel drilling technique between January 1, 2008, and March 31, 2011. These patients were matched with a transtibial technique cohort based on age and sex. Radiographic measurements were recorded from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative radiographs. RESULTS: Ten patients in each group were analyzed. There were significant differences between independent drilling and transtibial drilling cohorts in the estimated area of physeal disruption (1.64 vs 0.74 cm(2); P < .001), femoral tunnel angles (32.1° vs 72.8°; P < .001), and medial/lateral location of the femoral tunnel (24.2 vs 36.1 mm from lateral cortex; P = .001), respectively. There was a significant inverse correlation between femoral tunnel angle and estimated area of distal femoral physeal disruption (r = –0.8255, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Femoral tunnels created with an independent tunnel drilling technique disrupt a larger area of the distal femoral physis and create more eccentric tunnels compared with a transtibial technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As most studies noting the safety of transphyseal ACL reconstruction have utilized a central, vertical femoral tunnel, surgeons should be aware that if an independent femoral tunnel technique is utilized during transphyseal ACL reconstruction, more physeal tissue is at risk and tunnels are more eccentrically placed across the physis when drilling at more horizontal angles. Prior studies have shown that greater physeal involvement and eccentric tunnels may increase the risk of growth disturbance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4900331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49003312016-06-21 Transphyseal ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Does Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling Place the Physis at Greater Risk Compared With Transtibial Drilling? Cruz, Aristides I. Lakomkin, Nikita Fabricant, Peter D. Lawrence, J. Todd R. Orthop J Sports Med 25 BACKGROUND: Most studies examining the safety and efficacy of transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for skeletally immature patients utilize transtibial drilling. Independent femoral tunnel drilling may impart a different pattern of distal femoral physeal involvement. PURPOSE: To radiographically assess differences in distal femoral physeal disruption between transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling. We hypothesized that more oblique tunnels associated with independent drilling involve a significantly larger area of physeal disruption compared with vertically oriented tunnels. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We analyzed skeletally immature patients aged between 10 and 15 years who underwent transphyseal ACL reconstruction utilizing an independent femoral tunnel drilling technique between January 1, 2008, and March 31, 2011. These patients were matched with a transtibial technique cohort based on age and sex. Radiographic measurements were recorded from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative radiographs. RESULTS: Ten patients in each group were analyzed. There were significant differences between independent drilling and transtibial drilling cohorts in the estimated area of physeal disruption (1.64 vs 0.74 cm(2); P < .001), femoral tunnel angles (32.1° vs 72.8°; P < .001), and medial/lateral location of the femoral tunnel (24.2 vs 36.1 mm from lateral cortex; P = .001), respectively. There was a significant inverse correlation between femoral tunnel angle and estimated area of distal femoral physeal disruption (r = –0.8255, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Femoral tunnels created with an independent tunnel drilling technique disrupt a larger area of the distal femoral physis and create more eccentric tunnels compared with a transtibial technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As most studies noting the safety of transphyseal ACL reconstruction have utilized a central, vertical femoral tunnel, surgeons should be aware that if an independent femoral tunnel technique is utilized during transphyseal ACL reconstruction, more physeal tissue is at risk and tunnels are more eccentrically placed across the physis when drilling at more horizontal angles. Prior studies have shown that greater physeal involvement and eccentric tunnels may increase the risk of growth disturbance. SAGE Publications 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4900331/ /pubmed/27331075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116650432 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 25
Cruz, Aristides I.
Lakomkin, Nikita
Fabricant, Peter D.
Lawrence, J. Todd R.
Transphyseal ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Does Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling Place the Physis at Greater Risk Compared With Transtibial Drilling?
title Transphyseal ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Does Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling Place the Physis at Greater Risk Compared With Transtibial Drilling?
title_full Transphyseal ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Does Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling Place the Physis at Greater Risk Compared With Transtibial Drilling?
title_fullStr Transphyseal ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Does Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling Place the Physis at Greater Risk Compared With Transtibial Drilling?
title_full_unstemmed Transphyseal ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Does Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling Place the Physis at Greater Risk Compared With Transtibial Drilling?
title_short Transphyseal ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Does Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling Place the Physis at Greater Risk Compared With Transtibial Drilling?
title_sort transphyseal acl reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: does independent femoral tunnel drilling place the physis at greater risk compared with transtibial drilling?
topic 25
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27331075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116650432
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzaristidesi transphysealaclreconstructioninskeletallyimmaturepatientsdoesindependentfemoraltunneldrillingplacethephysisatgreaterriskcomparedwithtranstibialdrilling
AT lakomkinnikita transphysealaclreconstructioninskeletallyimmaturepatientsdoesindependentfemoraltunneldrillingplacethephysisatgreaterriskcomparedwithtranstibialdrilling
AT fabricantpeterd transphysealaclreconstructioninskeletallyimmaturepatientsdoesindependentfemoraltunneldrillingplacethephysisatgreaterriskcomparedwithtranstibialdrilling
AT lawrencejtoddr transphysealaclreconstructioninskeletallyimmaturepatientsdoesindependentfemoraltunneldrillingplacethephysisatgreaterriskcomparedwithtranstibialdrilling