Cargando…

Procedural and Physical Interventions for Vaccine Injections: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of physical and procedural interventions for reducing pain and related outcomes during vaccination. DESIGN/METHODS: Databases were searched using a broad search strategy to identify relevant randomized and quasi-randomized controlled tri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taddio, Anna, Shah, Vibhuti, McMurtry, C. Meghan, MacDonald, Noni E., Ipp, Moshe, Riddell, Rebecca Pillai, Noel, Melanie, Chambers, Christine T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26352919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000264
_version_ 1782436633803489280
author Taddio, Anna
Shah, Vibhuti
McMurtry, C. Meghan
MacDonald, Noni E.
Ipp, Moshe
Riddell, Rebecca Pillai
Noel, Melanie
Chambers, Christine T.
author_facet Taddio, Anna
Shah, Vibhuti
McMurtry, C. Meghan
MacDonald, Noni E.
Ipp, Moshe
Riddell, Rebecca Pillai
Noel, Melanie
Chambers, Christine T.
author_sort Taddio, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of physical and procedural interventions for reducing pain and related outcomes during vaccination. DESIGN/METHODS: Databases were searched using a broad search strategy to identify relevant randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials. Data were extracted according to procedure phase (preprocedure, acute, recovery, and combinations of these) and pooled using established methods. RESULTS: A total of 31 studies were included. Acute infant distress was diminished during intramuscular injection without aspiration (n=313): standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.18, −0.46). Injecting the most painful vaccine last during vaccinations reduced acute infant distress (n=196): SMD −0.69 (95% CI: −0.98, −0.4). Simultaneous injections reduced acute infant distress compared with sequential injections (n=172): SMD −0.56 (95% CI: −0.87, −0.25). There was no benefit of simultaneous injections in children. Less infant distress during the acute and recovery phases combined occurred with vastus lateralis (vs. deltoid) injections (n=185): SMD −0.70 (95% CI: −1.00, −0.41). Skin-to-skin contact in neonates (n=736) reduced acute distress: SMD −0.65 (95% CI: −1.05, −0.25). Holding infants reduced acute distress after removal of the data from 1 methodologically diverse study (n=107): SMD −1.25 (95% CI: −2.05, −0.46). Holding after vaccination (n=417) reduced infant distress during the acute and recovery phases combined: SMD −0.65 (95% CI: −1.08, −0.22). Self-reported fear was reduced for children positioned upright (n=107): SMD −0.39 (95% CI: −0.77, −0.01). Non-nutritive sucking (n=186) reduced acute distress in infants: SMD −1.88 (95% CI: −2.57, −1.18). Manual tactile stimulation did not reduce pain across the lifespan. An external vibrating device and cold reduced pain in children (n=145): SMD −1.23 (95% CI: −1.58, −0.87). There was no benefit of warming the vaccine in adults. Muscle tension was beneficial in selected indices of fainting in adolescents and adults. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions with evidence of benefit in select populations include: no aspiration, injecting most painful vaccine last, simultaneous injections, vastus lateralis injection, positioning interventions, non-nutritive sucking, external vibrating device with cold, and muscle tension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4900423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49004232016-06-28 Procedural and Physical Interventions for Vaccine Injections: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trials Taddio, Anna Shah, Vibhuti McMurtry, C. Meghan MacDonald, Noni E. Ipp, Moshe Riddell, Rebecca Pillai Noel, Melanie Chambers, Christine T. Clin J Pain Procedural and Physical Interventions BACKGROUND: This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of physical and procedural interventions for reducing pain and related outcomes during vaccination. DESIGN/METHODS: Databases were searched using a broad search strategy to identify relevant randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials. Data were extracted according to procedure phase (preprocedure, acute, recovery, and combinations of these) and pooled using established methods. RESULTS: A total of 31 studies were included. Acute infant distress was diminished during intramuscular injection without aspiration (n=313): standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.18, −0.46). Injecting the most painful vaccine last during vaccinations reduced acute infant distress (n=196): SMD −0.69 (95% CI: −0.98, −0.4). Simultaneous injections reduced acute infant distress compared with sequential injections (n=172): SMD −0.56 (95% CI: −0.87, −0.25). There was no benefit of simultaneous injections in children. Less infant distress during the acute and recovery phases combined occurred with vastus lateralis (vs. deltoid) injections (n=185): SMD −0.70 (95% CI: −1.00, −0.41). Skin-to-skin contact in neonates (n=736) reduced acute distress: SMD −0.65 (95% CI: −1.05, −0.25). Holding infants reduced acute distress after removal of the data from 1 methodologically diverse study (n=107): SMD −1.25 (95% CI: −2.05, −0.46). Holding after vaccination (n=417) reduced infant distress during the acute and recovery phases combined: SMD −0.65 (95% CI: −1.08, −0.22). Self-reported fear was reduced for children positioned upright (n=107): SMD −0.39 (95% CI: −0.77, −0.01). Non-nutritive sucking (n=186) reduced acute distress in infants: SMD −1.88 (95% CI: −2.57, −1.18). Manual tactile stimulation did not reduce pain across the lifespan. An external vibrating device and cold reduced pain in children (n=145): SMD −1.23 (95% CI: −1.58, −0.87). There was no benefit of warming the vaccine in adults. Muscle tension was beneficial in selected indices of fainting in adolescents and adults. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions with evidence of benefit in select populations include: no aspiration, injecting most painful vaccine last, simultaneous injections, vastus lateralis injection, positioning interventions, non-nutritive sucking, external vibrating device with cold, and muscle tension. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-10 2015-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4900423/ /pubmed/26352919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000264 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Procedural and Physical Interventions
Taddio, Anna
Shah, Vibhuti
McMurtry, C. Meghan
MacDonald, Noni E.
Ipp, Moshe
Riddell, Rebecca Pillai
Noel, Melanie
Chambers, Christine T.
Procedural and Physical Interventions for Vaccine Injections: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trials
title Procedural and Physical Interventions for Vaccine Injections: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Procedural and Physical Interventions for Vaccine Injections: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Procedural and Physical Interventions for Vaccine Injections: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Procedural and Physical Interventions for Vaccine Injections: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Procedural and Physical Interventions for Vaccine Injections: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort procedural and physical interventions for vaccine injections: systematic review of randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials
topic Procedural and Physical Interventions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26352919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000264
work_keys_str_mv AT taddioanna proceduralandphysicalinterventionsforvaccineinjectionssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandquasirandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shahvibhuti proceduralandphysicalinterventionsforvaccineinjectionssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandquasirandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mcmurtrycmeghan proceduralandphysicalinterventionsforvaccineinjectionssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandquasirandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT macdonaldnonie proceduralandphysicalinterventionsforvaccineinjectionssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandquasirandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ippmoshe proceduralandphysicalinterventionsforvaccineinjectionssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandquasirandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT riddellrebeccapillai proceduralandphysicalinterventionsforvaccineinjectionssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandquasirandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT noelmelanie proceduralandphysicalinterventionsforvaccineinjectionssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandquasirandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chamberschristinet proceduralandphysicalinterventionsforvaccineinjectionssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandquasirandomizedcontrolledtrials