Cargando…

National Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: A Cross Sectional Study in Ireland

OBJECTIVE: Internationally, caesarean section (CS) rates are rising. However, mean rates of CS across providers obscure extremes of CS provision. We aimed to quantify variation between all maternity units in Ireland. METHODS: Two national databases, the National Perinatal Reporting System and the Ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinnott, Sarah-Jo, Brick, Aoife, Layte, Richard, Cunningham, Nathan, Turner, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156172
_version_ 1782436662345728000
author Sinnott, Sarah-Jo
Brick, Aoife
Layte, Richard
Cunningham, Nathan
Turner, Michael J.
author_facet Sinnott, Sarah-Jo
Brick, Aoife
Layte, Richard
Cunningham, Nathan
Turner, Michael J.
author_sort Sinnott, Sarah-Jo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Internationally, caesarean section (CS) rates are rising. However, mean rates of CS across providers obscure extremes of CS provision. We aimed to quantify variation between all maternity units in Ireland. METHODS: Two national databases, the National Perinatal Reporting System and the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry Scheme, were used to analyse data for all women delivering singleton births weighing ≥500g. We used multilevel models to examine variation between hospitals in Ireland for elective and emergency CS, adjusted for individual level sociodemographic, clinical and organisational variables. Analyses were subsequently stratified for nullipara and multipara with and without prior CS. RESULTS: The national CS rate was 25.6% (range 18.2% ─ 35.1%). This was highest in multipara with prior CS at 86.1% (range 6.9% ─ 100%). The proportion of variation in CS that was attributable to the hospital of birth was 11.1% (95% CI, 6.0 ─ 19.4) for elective CS and 2.9% (95% CI, 1.4 ─ 5.6) for emergency CS, after adjustment. Stratifying across parity group, variation between hospitals was greatest for multipara with prior CS. Both types of CS were predicted by increasing age, prior history of miscarriage or stillbirth, prior CS, antenatal complications and private model of care. CONCLUSION: The proportion of variation attributable to the hospital was higher for elective CS than emergency CS suggesting that variation is more likely influenced by antenatal decision making than intrapartum decision making. Multipara with prior CS were particularly subject to variability, highlighting a need for consensus on appropriate care in this group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4900579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49005792016-06-24 National Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: A Cross Sectional Study in Ireland Sinnott, Sarah-Jo Brick, Aoife Layte, Richard Cunningham, Nathan Turner, Michael J. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Internationally, caesarean section (CS) rates are rising. However, mean rates of CS across providers obscure extremes of CS provision. We aimed to quantify variation between all maternity units in Ireland. METHODS: Two national databases, the National Perinatal Reporting System and the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry Scheme, were used to analyse data for all women delivering singleton births weighing ≥500g. We used multilevel models to examine variation between hospitals in Ireland for elective and emergency CS, adjusted for individual level sociodemographic, clinical and organisational variables. Analyses were subsequently stratified for nullipara and multipara with and without prior CS. RESULTS: The national CS rate was 25.6% (range 18.2% ─ 35.1%). This was highest in multipara with prior CS at 86.1% (range 6.9% ─ 100%). The proportion of variation in CS that was attributable to the hospital of birth was 11.1% (95% CI, 6.0 ─ 19.4) for elective CS and 2.9% (95% CI, 1.4 ─ 5.6) for emergency CS, after adjustment. Stratifying across parity group, variation between hospitals was greatest for multipara with prior CS. Both types of CS were predicted by increasing age, prior history of miscarriage or stillbirth, prior CS, antenatal complications and private model of care. CONCLUSION: The proportion of variation attributable to the hospital was higher for elective CS than emergency CS suggesting that variation is more likely influenced by antenatal decision making than intrapartum decision making. Multipara with prior CS were particularly subject to variability, highlighting a need for consensus on appropriate care in this group. Public Library of Science 2016-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4900579/ /pubmed/27280848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156172 Text en © 2016 Sinnott et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sinnott, Sarah-Jo
Brick, Aoife
Layte, Richard
Cunningham, Nathan
Turner, Michael J.
National Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: A Cross Sectional Study in Ireland
title National Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: A Cross Sectional Study in Ireland
title_full National Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: A Cross Sectional Study in Ireland
title_fullStr National Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: A Cross Sectional Study in Ireland
title_full_unstemmed National Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: A Cross Sectional Study in Ireland
title_short National Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: A Cross Sectional Study in Ireland
title_sort national variation in caesarean section rates: a cross sectional study in ireland
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156172
work_keys_str_mv AT sinnottsarahjo nationalvariationincaesareansectionratesacrosssectionalstudyinireland
AT brickaoife nationalvariationincaesareansectionratesacrosssectionalstudyinireland
AT layterichard nationalvariationincaesareansectionratesacrosssectionalstudyinireland
AT cunninghamnathan nationalvariationincaesareansectionratesacrosssectionalstudyinireland
AT turnermichaelj nationalvariationincaesareansectionratesacrosssectionalstudyinireland