Cargando…
Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables
Antonym pair members can be differentiated by each word’s markedness–that distinction attributable to the presence or absence of features at morphological or semantic levels. Morphologically marked words incorporate their unmarked counterpart with additional morphs (e.g., “unlucky” vs. “lucky”); pro...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157141 |
_version_ | 1782436679379845120 |
---|---|
author | Ingram, Joanne Hand, Christopher J. Maciejewski, Greg |
author_facet | Ingram, Joanne Hand, Christopher J. Maciejewski, Greg |
author_sort | Ingram, Joanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antonym pair members can be differentiated by each word’s markedness–that distinction attributable to the presence or absence of features at morphological or semantic levels. Morphologically marked words incorporate their unmarked counterpart with additional morphs (e.g., “unlucky” vs. “lucky”); properties used to determine semantically marked words (e.g., “short” vs. “long”) are less clearly defined. Despite extensive theoretical scrutiny, the lexical properties of markedness have received scant empirical study. The current paper employs an antonym sequencing approach to measure markedness: establishing markedness probabilities for individual words and evaluating their relationship with other lexical properties (e.g., length, frequency, valence). Regression analyses reveal that markedness probability is, as predicted, related to affixation and also strongly related to valence. Our results support the suggestion that antonym sequence is reflected in discourse, and further analysis demonstrates that markedness probabilities, derived from the antonym sequencing task, reflect the ordering of antonyms within natural language. In line with the Pollyanna Hypothesis, we argue that markedness is closely related to valence; language users demonstrate a tendency to present words evaluated positively ahead of those evaluated negatively if given the choice. Future research should consider the relationship of markedness and valence, and the influence of contextual information in determining which member of an antonym pair is marked or unmarked within discourse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4900653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49006532016-06-24 Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables Ingram, Joanne Hand, Christopher J. Maciejewski, Greg PLoS One Research Article Antonym pair members can be differentiated by each word’s markedness–that distinction attributable to the presence or absence of features at morphological or semantic levels. Morphologically marked words incorporate their unmarked counterpart with additional morphs (e.g., “unlucky” vs. “lucky”); properties used to determine semantically marked words (e.g., “short” vs. “long”) are less clearly defined. Despite extensive theoretical scrutiny, the lexical properties of markedness have received scant empirical study. The current paper employs an antonym sequencing approach to measure markedness: establishing markedness probabilities for individual words and evaluating their relationship with other lexical properties (e.g., length, frequency, valence). Regression analyses reveal that markedness probability is, as predicted, related to affixation and also strongly related to valence. Our results support the suggestion that antonym sequence is reflected in discourse, and further analysis demonstrates that markedness probabilities, derived from the antonym sequencing task, reflect the ordering of antonyms within natural language. In line with the Pollyanna Hypothesis, we argue that markedness is closely related to valence; language users demonstrate a tendency to present words evaluated positively ahead of those evaluated negatively if given the choice. Future research should consider the relationship of markedness and valence, and the influence of contextual information in determining which member of an antonym pair is marked or unmarked within discourse. Public Library of Science 2016-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4900653/ /pubmed/27280450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157141 Text en © 2016 Ingram et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ingram, Joanne Hand, Christopher J. Maciejewski, Greg Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables |
title | Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables |
title_full | Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables |
title_fullStr | Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables |
title_short | Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables |
title_sort | exploring the measurement of markedness and its relationship with other linguistic variables |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ingramjoanne exploringthemeasurementofmarkednessanditsrelationshipwithotherlinguisticvariables AT handchristopherj exploringthemeasurementofmarkednessanditsrelationshipwithotherlinguisticvariables AT maciejewskigreg exploringthemeasurementofmarkednessanditsrelationshipwithotherlinguisticvariables |