Cargando…

Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables

Antonym pair members can be differentiated by each word’s markedness–that distinction attributable to the presence or absence of features at morphological or semantic levels. Morphologically marked words incorporate their unmarked counterpart with additional morphs (e.g., “unlucky” vs. “lucky”); pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ingram, Joanne, Hand, Christopher J., Maciejewski, Greg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157141
_version_ 1782436679379845120
author Ingram, Joanne
Hand, Christopher J.
Maciejewski, Greg
author_facet Ingram, Joanne
Hand, Christopher J.
Maciejewski, Greg
author_sort Ingram, Joanne
collection PubMed
description Antonym pair members can be differentiated by each word’s markedness–that distinction attributable to the presence or absence of features at morphological or semantic levels. Morphologically marked words incorporate their unmarked counterpart with additional morphs (e.g., “unlucky” vs. “lucky”); properties used to determine semantically marked words (e.g., “short” vs. “long”) are less clearly defined. Despite extensive theoretical scrutiny, the lexical properties of markedness have received scant empirical study. The current paper employs an antonym sequencing approach to measure markedness: establishing markedness probabilities for individual words and evaluating their relationship with other lexical properties (e.g., length, frequency, valence). Regression analyses reveal that markedness probability is, as predicted, related to affixation and also strongly related to valence. Our results support the suggestion that antonym sequence is reflected in discourse, and further analysis demonstrates that markedness probabilities, derived from the antonym sequencing task, reflect the ordering of antonyms within natural language. In line with the Pollyanna Hypothesis, we argue that markedness is closely related to valence; language users demonstrate a tendency to present words evaluated positively ahead of those evaluated negatively if given the choice. Future research should consider the relationship of markedness and valence, and the influence of contextual information in determining which member of an antonym pair is marked or unmarked within discourse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4900653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49006532016-06-24 Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables Ingram, Joanne Hand, Christopher J. Maciejewski, Greg PLoS One Research Article Antonym pair members can be differentiated by each word’s markedness–that distinction attributable to the presence or absence of features at morphological or semantic levels. Morphologically marked words incorporate their unmarked counterpart with additional morphs (e.g., “unlucky” vs. “lucky”); properties used to determine semantically marked words (e.g., “short” vs. “long”) are less clearly defined. Despite extensive theoretical scrutiny, the lexical properties of markedness have received scant empirical study. The current paper employs an antonym sequencing approach to measure markedness: establishing markedness probabilities for individual words and evaluating their relationship with other lexical properties (e.g., length, frequency, valence). Regression analyses reveal that markedness probability is, as predicted, related to affixation and also strongly related to valence. Our results support the suggestion that antonym sequence is reflected in discourse, and further analysis demonstrates that markedness probabilities, derived from the antonym sequencing task, reflect the ordering of antonyms within natural language. In line with the Pollyanna Hypothesis, we argue that markedness is closely related to valence; language users demonstrate a tendency to present words evaluated positively ahead of those evaluated negatively if given the choice. Future research should consider the relationship of markedness and valence, and the influence of contextual information in determining which member of an antonym pair is marked or unmarked within discourse. Public Library of Science 2016-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4900653/ /pubmed/27280450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157141 Text en © 2016 Ingram et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ingram, Joanne
Hand, Christopher J.
Maciejewski, Greg
Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables
title Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables
title_full Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables
title_fullStr Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables
title_short Exploring the Measurement of Markedness and Its Relationship with Other Linguistic Variables
title_sort exploring the measurement of markedness and its relationship with other linguistic variables
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157141
work_keys_str_mv AT ingramjoanne exploringthemeasurementofmarkednessanditsrelationshipwithotherlinguisticvariables
AT handchristopherj exploringthemeasurementofmarkednessanditsrelationshipwithotherlinguisticvariables
AT maciejewskigreg exploringthemeasurementofmarkednessanditsrelationshipwithotherlinguisticvariables