Cargando…

Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case–Control Comparative Analysis

The objective of this study was to assess whether preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with conventional breast imaging techniques decreases the rates of margin involvement and reexcision. Data on patients who underwent surgery for primary operable breast cancer were obtaine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lai, Hung-Wen, Chen, Chih-Jung, Lin, Ying-Jen, Chen, Shu-Ling, Wu, Hwa-Koon, Wu, Yu-Ting, Kuo, Shou-Jen, Chen, Shou-Tung, Chen, Dar-Ren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27258520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003810
_version_ 1782436693863825408
author Lai, Hung-Wen
Chen, Chih-Jung
Lin, Ying-Jen
Chen, Shu-Ling
Wu, Hwa-Koon
Wu, Yu-Ting
Kuo, Shou-Jen
Chen, Shou-Tung
Chen, Dar-Ren
author_facet Lai, Hung-Wen
Chen, Chih-Jung
Lin, Ying-Jen
Chen, Shu-Ling
Wu, Hwa-Koon
Wu, Yu-Ting
Kuo, Shou-Jen
Chen, Shou-Tung
Chen, Dar-Ren
author_sort Lai, Hung-Wen
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to assess whether preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with conventional breast imaging techniques decreases the rates of margin involvement and reexcision. Data on patients who underwent surgery for primary operable breast cancer were obtained from the Changhua Christian Hospital (CCH) breast cancer database. The rate of surgical margin involvement and the rate of reoperation were compared between patients who underwent conventional breast imaging modalities (Group A: mammography and sonography) and those who received breast MRI in addition to conventional imaging (Group B: mammography, sonography, and MRI). A total of 1468 patients were enrolled in this study. Among the 733 patients in Group A, 377 (51.4%) received breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and 356 (48.6%) received mastectomy. Among the 735 patients in Group B, 348 (47.3%) received BCS and 387 (52.7%) received mastectomy. There were no significant differences in operative method between patients who received conventional imaging alone and those that received MRI and conventional imaging (P = 0.13). The rate of detection of pathological multifocal/multicentric breast cancer was markedly higher in patients who received preoperative MRI than in those who underwent conventional imaging alone (14.3% vs 8.6%, P < 0.01). The overall rate of surgical margin involvement was significantly lower in patients who received MRI (5.0%) than in those who received conventional imaging alone (9.0%) (P < 0.01). However, a significant reduction in rate of surgical margin positivity was only observed in patients who received BCS (Group A, 14.6%; Group B, 6.6%, P < 0.01). The overall BCS reoperation rates were 11.7% in the conventional imaging group and 3.2% in the combined MRI group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in rate of residual cancer in specimens obtained during reoperation between the 2 preoperative imaging groups (Group A, 50%; Group B, 81.8%, P = 0.09). In multivariate analysis, multifocal/multicentric breast cancer (odds ratio = 2.38, P = 0.02) and without MRI use (odds ratio = 2.35, P < 0.01) were the major predisposing factors to margin involvement in patients received BCS. Preoperative breast MRI combined with conventional breast imaging results in a lower rate of surgical margin involvement and reoperations in patients who receive BCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4900728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49007282016-06-22 Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case–Control Comparative Analysis Lai, Hung-Wen Chen, Chih-Jung Lin, Ying-Jen Chen, Shu-Ling Wu, Hwa-Koon Wu, Yu-Ting Kuo, Shou-Jen Chen, Shou-Tung Chen, Dar-Ren Medicine (Baltimore) 5750 The objective of this study was to assess whether preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with conventional breast imaging techniques decreases the rates of margin involvement and reexcision. Data on patients who underwent surgery for primary operable breast cancer were obtained from the Changhua Christian Hospital (CCH) breast cancer database. The rate of surgical margin involvement and the rate of reoperation were compared between patients who underwent conventional breast imaging modalities (Group A: mammography and sonography) and those who received breast MRI in addition to conventional imaging (Group B: mammography, sonography, and MRI). A total of 1468 patients were enrolled in this study. Among the 733 patients in Group A, 377 (51.4%) received breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and 356 (48.6%) received mastectomy. Among the 735 patients in Group B, 348 (47.3%) received BCS and 387 (52.7%) received mastectomy. There were no significant differences in operative method between patients who received conventional imaging alone and those that received MRI and conventional imaging (P = 0.13). The rate of detection of pathological multifocal/multicentric breast cancer was markedly higher in patients who received preoperative MRI than in those who underwent conventional imaging alone (14.3% vs 8.6%, P < 0.01). The overall rate of surgical margin involvement was significantly lower in patients who received MRI (5.0%) than in those who received conventional imaging alone (9.0%) (P < 0.01). However, a significant reduction in rate of surgical margin positivity was only observed in patients who received BCS (Group A, 14.6%; Group B, 6.6%, P < 0.01). The overall BCS reoperation rates were 11.7% in the conventional imaging group and 3.2% in the combined MRI group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in rate of residual cancer in specimens obtained during reoperation between the 2 preoperative imaging groups (Group A, 50%; Group B, 81.8%, P = 0.09). In multivariate analysis, multifocal/multicentric breast cancer (odds ratio = 2.38, P = 0.02) and without MRI use (odds ratio = 2.35, P < 0.01) were the major predisposing factors to margin involvement in patients received BCS. Preoperative breast MRI combined with conventional breast imaging results in a lower rate of surgical margin involvement and reoperations in patients who receive BCS. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4900728/ /pubmed/27258520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003810 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5750
Lai, Hung-Wen
Chen, Chih-Jung
Lin, Ying-Jen
Chen, Shu-Ling
Wu, Hwa-Koon
Wu, Yu-Ting
Kuo, Shou-Jen
Chen, Shou-Tung
Chen, Dar-Ren
Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case–Control Comparative Analysis
title Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case–Control Comparative Analysis
title_full Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case–Control Comparative Analysis
title_fullStr Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case–Control Comparative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case–Control Comparative Analysis
title_short Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case–Control Comparative Analysis
title_sort does breast magnetic resonance imaging combined with conventional imaging modalities decrease the rates of surgical margin involvement and reoperation?: a case–control comparative analysis
topic 5750
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27258520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003810
work_keys_str_mv AT laihungwen doesbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcombinedwithconventionalimagingmodalitiesdecreasetheratesofsurgicalmargininvolvementandreoperationacasecontrolcomparativeanalysis
AT chenchihjung doesbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcombinedwithconventionalimagingmodalitiesdecreasetheratesofsurgicalmargininvolvementandreoperationacasecontrolcomparativeanalysis
AT linyingjen doesbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcombinedwithconventionalimagingmodalitiesdecreasetheratesofsurgicalmargininvolvementandreoperationacasecontrolcomparativeanalysis
AT chenshuling doesbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcombinedwithconventionalimagingmodalitiesdecreasetheratesofsurgicalmargininvolvementandreoperationacasecontrolcomparativeanalysis
AT wuhwakoon doesbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcombinedwithconventionalimagingmodalitiesdecreasetheratesofsurgicalmargininvolvementandreoperationacasecontrolcomparativeanalysis
AT wuyuting doesbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcombinedwithconventionalimagingmodalitiesdecreasetheratesofsurgicalmargininvolvementandreoperationacasecontrolcomparativeanalysis
AT kuoshoujen doesbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcombinedwithconventionalimagingmodalitiesdecreasetheratesofsurgicalmargininvolvementandreoperationacasecontrolcomparativeanalysis
AT chenshoutung doesbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcombinedwithconventionalimagingmodalitiesdecreasetheratesofsurgicalmargininvolvementandreoperationacasecontrolcomparativeanalysis
AT chendarren doesbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcombinedwithconventionalimagingmodalitiesdecreasetheratesofsurgicalmargininvolvementandreoperationacasecontrolcomparativeanalysis