Cargando…

Filling the Knowledge Gap in Diabetes Management During Ramadan: the Evolving Role of Trial Evidence

Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who fast during Ramadan face challenges in diabetes management due to substantial alterations in lifestyle and treatment that frequently accompany the decision to fast. International guidelines for treating T2D do not fully address the clinical issues uniqu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Sifri, Saud, Rizvi, Kashif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27091198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0168-9
_version_ 1782436716650430464
author Al Sifri, Saud
Rizvi, Kashif
author_facet Al Sifri, Saud
Rizvi, Kashif
author_sort Al Sifri, Saud
collection PubMed
description Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who fast during Ramadan face challenges in diabetes management due to substantial alterations in lifestyle and treatment that frequently accompany the decision to fast. International guidelines for treating T2D do not fully address the clinical issues unique to fasting, and other guidance documents lack the large and high-quality evidence base available for non-fasting conditions. We reviewed 10 randomized controlled trials and 20 observational studies in T2D during Ramadan to assess the quality of evidence and identify issues in trial design that should be addressed in future studies. Results indicated that heterogeneity in key aspects of trial design precluded meaningful comparisons across studies. These included patients’ baseline treatment at entry; use of a cutoff for glycemic control [glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c))] for eligibility; exclusion of patients with a history of recurrent hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness, or with other serious systemic diseases; duration of treatment and follow-up, selection of safety versus efficacy as primary end point; and definition and measurement of those end points. Fructosamine was rarely used as an efficacy end point, despite the advantage of reflecting glycemic control over a period more closely aligned with the duration of Ramadan fasting than HbA(1c). Adherence to treatment, definition and adherence to fasting, and changes in diet and exercise were reported inconsistently, and when reported, not in a fashion that would allow adequate control of confounding due to these variables. Despite a large body of evidence demonstrating their safety and efficacy in non-fasting populations, only two trials reported data for glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs, and neither involved a head-to-head comparison against dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. More rigorous studies using trial designs suited to the unique conditions of a fasting population and capturing both standardized efficacy and safety end points are needed to provide better guidance to optimal treatment of T2D during Ramadan fasting. Funding: Novo Nordisk AG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4900978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49009782016-06-27 Filling the Knowledge Gap in Diabetes Management During Ramadan: the Evolving Role of Trial Evidence Al Sifri, Saud Rizvi, Kashif Diabetes Ther Review Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who fast during Ramadan face challenges in diabetes management due to substantial alterations in lifestyle and treatment that frequently accompany the decision to fast. International guidelines for treating T2D do not fully address the clinical issues unique to fasting, and other guidance documents lack the large and high-quality evidence base available for non-fasting conditions. We reviewed 10 randomized controlled trials and 20 observational studies in T2D during Ramadan to assess the quality of evidence and identify issues in trial design that should be addressed in future studies. Results indicated that heterogeneity in key aspects of trial design precluded meaningful comparisons across studies. These included patients’ baseline treatment at entry; use of a cutoff for glycemic control [glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c))] for eligibility; exclusion of patients with a history of recurrent hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness, or with other serious systemic diseases; duration of treatment and follow-up, selection of safety versus efficacy as primary end point; and definition and measurement of those end points. Fructosamine was rarely used as an efficacy end point, despite the advantage of reflecting glycemic control over a period more closely aligned with the duration of Ramadan fasting than HbA(1c). Adherence to treatment, definition and adherence to fasting, and changes in diet and exercise were reported inconsistently, and when reported, not in a fashion that would allow adequate control of confounding due to these variables. Despite a large body of evidence demonstrating their safety and efficacy in non-fasting populations, only two trials reported data for glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs, and neither involved a head-to-head comparison against dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. More rigorous studies using trial designs suited to the unique conditions of a fasting population and capturing both standardized efficacy and safety end points are needed to provide better guidance to optimal treatment of T2D during Ramadan fasting. Funding: Novo Nordisk AG. Springer Healthcare 2016-04-18 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4900978/ /pubmed/27091198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0168-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Al Sifri, Saud
Rizvi, Kashif
Filling the Knowledge Gap in Diabetes Management During Ramadan: the Evolving Role of Trial Evidence
title Filling the Knowledge Gap in Diabetes Management During Ramadan: the Evolving Role of Trial Evidence
title_full Filling the Knowledge Gap in Diabetes Management During Ramadan: the Evolving Role of Trial Evidence
title_fullStr Filling the Knowledge Gap in Diabetes Management During Ramadan: the Evolving Role of Trial Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Filling the Knowledge Gap in Diabetes Management During Ramadan: the Evolving Role of Trial Evidence
title_short Filling the Knowledge Gap in Diabetes Management During Ramadan: the Evolving Role of Trial Evidence
title_sort filling the knowledge gap in diabetes management during ramadan: the evolving role of trial evidence
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27091198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0168-9
work_keys_str_mv AT alsifrisaud fillingtheknowledgegapindiabetesmanagementduringramadantheevolvingroleoftrialevidence
AT rizvikashif fillingtheknowledgegapindiabetesmanagementduringramadantheevolvingroleoftrialevidence