Cargando…

Model-Based Comparison of Deep Brain Stimulation Array Functionality with Varying Number of Radial Electrodes and Machine Learning Feature Sets

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads with radially distributed electrodes have potential to improve clinical outcomes through more selective targeting of pathways and networks within the brain. However, increasing the number of electrodes on clinical DBS leads by replacing conventional cylindrical she...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teplitzky, Benjamin A., Zitella, Laura M., Xiao, YiZi, Johnson, Matthew D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27375470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2016.00058
_version_ 1782436739913089024
author Teplitzky, Benjamin A.
Zitella, Laura M.
Xiao, YiZi
Johnson, Matthew D.
author_facet Teplitzky, Benjamin A.
Zitella, Laura M.
Xiao, YiZi
Johnson, Matthew D.
author_sort Teplitzky, Benjamin A.
collection PubMed
description Deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads with radially distributed electrodes have potential to improve clinical outcomes through more selective targeting of pathways and networks within the brain. However, increasing the number of electrodes on clinical DBS leads by replacing conventional cylindrical shell electrodes with radially distributed electrodes raises practical design and stimulation programming challenges. We used computational modeling to investigate: (1) how the number of radial electrodes impact the ability to steer, shift, and sculpt a region of neural activation (RoA), and (2) which RoA features are best used in combination with machine learning classifiers to predict programming settings to target a particular area near the lead. Stimulation configurations were modeled using 27 lead designs with one to nine radially distributed electrodes. The computational modeling framework consisted of a three-dimensional finite element tissue conductance model in combination with a multi-compartment biophysical axon model. For each lead design, two-dimensional threshold-dependent RoAs were calculated from the computational modeling results. The models showed more radial electrodes enabled finer resolution RoA steering; however, stimulation amplitude, and therefore spatial extent of the RoA, was limited by charge injection and charge storage capacity constraints due to the small electrode surface area for leads with more than four radially distributed electrodes. RoA shifting resolution was improved by the addition of radial electrodes when using uniform multi-cathode stimulation, but non-uniform multi-cathode stimulation produced equivalent or better resolution shifting without increasing the number of radial electrodes. Robust machine learning classification of 15 monopolar stimulation configurations was achieved using as few as three geometric features describing a RoA. The results of this study indicate that, for a clinical-scale DBS lead, more than four radial electrodes minimally improved in the ability to steer, shift, and sculpt axonal activation around a DBS lead and a simple feature set consisting of the RoA center of mass and orientation enabled robust machine learning classification. These results provide important design constraints for future development of high-density DBS arrays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4901081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49010812016-07-01 Model-Based Comparison of Deep Brain Stimulation Array Functionality with Varying Number of Radial Electrodes and Machine Learning Feature Sets Teplitzky, Benjamin A. Zitella, Laura M. Xiao, YiZi Johnson, Matthew D. Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience Deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads with radially distributed electrodes have potential to improve clinical outcomes through more selective targeting of pathways and networks within the brain. However, increasing the number of electrodes on clinical DBS leads by replacing conventional cylindrical shell electrodes with radially distributed electrodes raises practical design and stimulation programming challenges. We used computational modeling to investigate: (1) how the number of radial electrodes impact the ability to steer, shift, and sculpt a region of neural activation (RoA), and (2) which RoA features are best used in combination with machine learning classifiers to predict programming settings to target a particular area near the lead. Stimulation configurations were modeled using 27 lead designs with one to nine radially distributed electrodes. The computational modeling framework consisted of a three-dimensional finite element tissue conductance model in combination with a multi-compartment biophysical axon model. For each lead design, two-dimensional threshold-dependent RoAs were calculated from the computational modeling results. The models showed more radial electrodes enabled finer resolution RoA steering; however, stimulation amplitude, and therefore spatial extent of the RoA, was limited by charge injection and charge storage capacity constraints due to the small electrode surface area for leads with more than four radially distributed electrodes. RoA shifting resolution was improved by the addition of radial electrodes when using uniform multi-cathode stimulation, but non-uniform multi-cathode stimulation produced equivalent or better resolution shifting without increasing the number of radial electrodes. Robust machine learning classification of 15 monopolar stimulation configurations was achieved using as few as three geometric features describing a RoA. The results of this study indicate that, for a clinical-scale DBS lead, more than four radial electrodes minimally improved in the ability to steer, shift, and sculpt axonal activation around a DBS lead and a simple feature set consisting of the RoA center of mass and orientation enabled robust machine learning classification. These results provide important design constraints for future development of high-density DBS arrays. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4901081/ /pubmed/27375470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2016.00058 Text en Copyright © 2016 Teplitzky, Zitella, Xiao and Johnson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Teplitzky, Benjamin A.
Zitella, Laura M.
Xiao, YiZi
Johnson, Matthew D.
Model-Based Comparison of Deep Brain Stimulation Array Functionality with Varying Number of Radial Electrodes and Machine Learning Feature Sets
title Model-Based Comparison of Deep Brain Stimulation Array Functionality with Varying Number of Radial Electrodes and Machine Learning Feature Sets
title_full Model-Based Comparison of Deep Brain Stimulation Array Functionality with Varying Number of Radial Electrodes and Machine Learning Feature Sets
title_fullStr Model-Based Comparison of Deep Brain Stimulation Array Functionality with Varying Number of Radial Electrodes and Machine Learning Feature Sets
title_full_unstemmed Model-Based Comparison of Deep Brain Stimulation Array Functionality with Varying Number of Radial Electrodes and Machine Learning Feature Sets
title_short Model-Based Comparison of Deep Brain Stimulation Array Functionality with Varying Number of Radial Electrodes and Machine Learning Feature Sets
title_sort model-based comparison of deep brain stimulation array functionality with varying number of radial electrodes and machine learning feature sets
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27375470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2016.00058
work_keys_str_mv AT teplitzkybenjamina modelbasedcomparisonofdeepbrainstimulationarrayfunctionalitywithvaryingnumberofradialelectrodesandmachinelearningfeaturesets
AT zitellalauram modelbasedcomparisonofdeepbrainstimulationarrayfunctionalitywithvaryingnumberofradialelectrodesandmachinelearningfeaturesets
AT xiaoyizi modelbasedcomparisonofdeepbrainstimulationarrayfunctionalitywithvaryingnumberofradialelectrodesandmachinelearningfeaturesets
AT johnsonmatthewd modelbasedcomparisonofdeepbrainstimulationarrayfunctionalitywithvaryingnumberofradialelectrodesandmachinelearningfeaturesets