Cargando…

SGLT2 Inhibition and cardiovascular events: why did EMPA-REG Outcomes surprise and what were the likely mechanisms?

While the modest reduction in the primary composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death in the EMPA-REG Outcomes trial was welcome, the 30–40% reductions in heart failure hospitalisation (HFH) and cardiovascular and all-cause deaths in patients treated with empagliflozin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sattar, Naveed, McLaren, James, Kristensen, Søren L., Preiss, David, McMurray, John J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27112340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-3956-x
_version_ 1782436747015094272
author Sattar, Naveed
McLaren, James
Kristensen, Søren L.
Preiss, David
McMurray, John J.
author_facet Sattar, Naveed
McLaren, James
Kristensen, Søren L.
Preiss, David
McMurray, John J.
author_sort Sattar, Naveed
collection PubMed
description While the modest reduction in the primary composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death in the EMPA-REG Outcomes trial was welcome, the 30–40% reductions in heart failure hospitalisation (HFH) and cardiovascular and all-cause deaths in patients treated with empagliflozin were highly impressive and unexpected. In this review, we discuss briefly why cardiovascular endpoint trials for new diabetes agents are required and describe the results of the first four such trials to have reported, as a precursor to understanding why the EMPA-REG Outcomes results came as a surprise. Thereafter, we discuss potential mechanisms that could explain the EMPA-REG Outcomes results, concentrating on non-atherothrombotic effects. We suggest that the main driver of benefit may derive from the specific effects of sodium-glucose linked transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibition on renal sodium and glucose handling, leading to both diuresis and improvements in diabetes-related maladaptive renal arteriolar responses. These haemodynamic and renal effects are likely to be beneficial in patients with clinical or subclinical cardiac dysfunction. The net result of these processes, we argue, is an improvement in cardiac systolic and diastolic function and, thereby, a lower risk of HFH and sudden cardiac death. We also discuss whether other drugs in this class are likely to show similar cardiovascular benefits. Finally, areas for future research are suggested to better understand the relevant mechanisms and to identify other groups who may benefit from SGLT2 inhibitor therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4901113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49011132016-06-27 SGLT2 Inhibition and cardiovascular events: why did EMPA-REG Outcomes surprise and what were the likely mechanisms? Sattar, Naveed McLaren, James Kristensen, Søren L. Preiss, David McMurray, John J. Diabetologia Review While the modest reduction in the primary composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death in the EMPA-REG Outcomes trial was welcome, the 30–40% reductions in heart failure hospitalisation (HFH) and cardiovascular and all-cause deaths in patients treated with empagliflozin were highly impressive and unexpected. In this review, we discuss briefly why cardiovascular endpoint trials for new diabetes agents are required and describe the results of the first four such trials to have reported, as a precursor to understanding why the EMPA-REG Outcomes results came as a surprise. Thereafter, we discuss potential mechanisms that could explain the EMPA-REG Outcomes results, concentrating on non-atherothrombotic effects. We suggest that the main driver of benefit may derive from the specific effects of sodium-glucose linked transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibition on renal sodium and glucose handling, leading to both diuresis and improvements in diabetes-related maladaptive renal arteriolar responses. These haemodynamic and renal effects are likely to be beneficial in patients with clinical or subclinical cardiac dysfunction. The net result of these processes, we argue, is an improvement in cardiac systolic and diastolic function and, thereby, a lower risk of HFH and sudden cardiac death. We also discuss whether other drugs in this class are likely to show similar cardiovascular benefits. Finally, areas for future research are suggested to better understand the relevant mechanisms and to identify other groups who may benefit from SGLT2 inhibitor therapy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-04-25 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4901113/ /pubmed/27112340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-3956-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Sattar, Naveed
McLaren, James
Kristensen, Søren L.
Preiss, David
McMurray, John J.
SGLT2 Inhibition and cardiovascular events: why did EMPA-REG Outcomes surprise and what were the likely mechanisms?
title SGLT2 Inhibition and cardiovascular events: why did EMPA-REG Outcomes surprise and what were the likely mechanisms?
title_full SGLT2 Inhibition and cardiovascular events: why did EMPA-REG Outcomes surprise and what were the likely mechanisms?
title_fullStr SGLT2 Inhibition and cardiovascular events: why did EMPA-REG Outcomes surprise and what were the likely mechanisms?
title_full_unstemmed SGLT2 Inhibition and cardiovascular events: why did EMPA-REG Outcomes surprise and what were the likely mechanisms?
title_short SGLT2 Inhibition and cardiovascular events: why did EMPA-REG Outcomes surprise and what were the likely mechanisms?
title_sort sglt2 inhibition and cardiovascular events: why did empa-reg outcomes surprise and what were the likely mechanisms?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27112340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-3956-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sattarnaveed sglt2inhibitionandcardiovasculareventswhydidemparegoutcomessurpriseandwhatwerethelikelymechanisms
AT mclarenjames sglt2inhibitionandcardiovasculareventswhydidemparegoutcomessurpriseandwhatwerethelikelymechanisms
AT kristensensørenl sglt2inhibitionandcardiovasculareventswhydidemparegoutcomessurpriseandwhatwerethelikelymechanisms
AT preissdavid sglt2inhibitionandcardiovasculareventswhydidemparegoutcomessurpriseandwhatwerethelikelymechanisms
AT mcmurrayjohnj sglt2inhibitionandcardiovasculareventswhydidemparegoutcomessurpriseandwhatwerethelikelymechanisms