Cargando…
Attitudes and Mental Files in Discourse Representation Theory
I present a concrete DRT-based syntax and semantics for the representation of mental states in the style of Kamp (1990). This system is closely related to Recanati’s (2012) Mental Files framework, but adds a crucial distinction between anchors, the analogues of mental files, and attitudes like belie...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27358659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0296-6 |
_version_ | 1782436747723931648 |
---|---|
author | Maier, Emar |
author_facet | Maier, Emar |
author_sort | Maier, Emar |
collection | PubMed |
description | I present a concrete DRT-based syntax and semantics for the representation of mental states in the style of Kamp (1990). This system is closely related to Recanati’s (2012) Mental Files framework, but adds a crucial distinction between anchors, the analogues of mental files, and attitudes like belief, desire and imagination. Attitudes are represented as separate compartments that can be referentially dependent on anchors. I show how the added distinctions help defend the useful notion of an acquaintance-based mental file against Ninan’s (Inquiry 58(4):368–377 2015) recent challenge involving counterfactual de re attitudes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4901116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49011162016-06-27 Attitudes and Mental Files in Discourse Representation Theory Maier, Emar Rev Philos Psychol Article I present a concrete DRT-based syntax and semantics for the representation of mental states in the style of Kamp (1990). This system is closely related to Recanati’s (2012) Mental Files framework, but adds a crucial distinction between anchors, the analogues of mental files, and attitudes like belief, desire and imagination. Attitudes are represented as separate compartments that can be referentially dependent on anchors. I show how the added distinctions help defend the useful notion of an acquaintance-based mental file against Ninan’s (Inquiry 58(4):368–377 2015) recent challenge involving counterfactual de re attitudes. Springer Netherlands 2016-01-12 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4901116/ /pubmed/27358659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0296-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Maier, Emar Attitudes and Mental Files in Discourse Representation Theory |
title | Attitudes and Mental Files in Discourse Representation Theory |
title_full | Attitudes and Mental Files in Discourse Representation Theory |
title_fullStr | Attitudes and Mental Files in Discourse Representation Theory |
title_full_unstemmed | Attitudes and Mental Files in Discourse Representation Theory |
title_short | Attitudes and Mental Files in Discourse Representation Theory |
title_sort | attitudes and mental files in discourse representation theory |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27358659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0296-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maieremar attitudesandmentalfilesindiscourserepresentationtheory |