Cargando…

Cost-Utility Analysis of Lurasidone Versus Aripiprazole in Adults with Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND: In 2014, lurasidone, an atypical antipsychotic, was approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. It is an alternative treatment option to aripiprazole, and when compared with aripiprazole, lurasidone was associated with improved symptom reduction and reduced risk of weight gain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajagopalan, Krithika, Trueman, David, Crowe, Lydia, Squirrell, Daniel, Loebel, Antony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0405-0
_version_ 1782436748855345152
author Rajagopalan, Krithika
Trueman, David
Crowe, Lydia
Squirrell, Daniel
Loebel, Antony
author_facet Rajagopalan, Krithika
Trueman, David
Crowe, Lydia
Squirrell, Daniel
Loebel, Antony
author_sort Rajagopalan, Krithika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2014, lurasidone, an atypical antipsychotic, was approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. It is an alternative treatment option to aripiprazole, and when compared with aripiprazole, lurasidone was associated with improved symptom reduction and reduced risk of weight gain and relapse. We conducted a cost-utility analysis of lurasidone versus aripiprazole from the perspective of healthcare services, using Scotland and Wales as specific case studies. METHODS: A 10-year Markov model, incorporating a 6-week acute phase and a maintenance phase across three health states (discontinuation, relapse, death) was constructed. Six-week probabilities of discontinuation and adverse events were based on a published independent mixed-treatment comparison; long-term risks of relapse and discontinuation were from an indirect comparison. Costs included drug therapy, relapse, and outpatient, primary and residential care. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5 %. Utility estimates were taken from published literature, and cost effectiveness was expressed as total 10-year incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: Lurasidone yielded a cost saving of £3383 and an improvement of 0.005 QALYs versus aripiprazole, in Scotland. Deterministic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that results were sensitive to relapse rates, while probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that lurasidone had the highest expected net benefit at willingness-to-pay thresholds of £20,000–30,000 per QALY. The probability that lurasidone was a cost-effective treatment strategy was approximately 75 % at all willingness-to-pay thresholds, with similar results being obtained for the Welsh analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that lurasidone would provide an effective, cost-saving alternative for the healthcare service in the treatment of adult patients with schizophrenia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0405-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4901121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49011212016-06-27 Cost-Utility Analysis of Lurasidone Versus Aripiprazole in Adults with Schizophrenia Rajagopalan, Krithika Trueman, David Crowe, Lydia Squirrell, Daniel Loebel, Antony Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2014, lurasidone, an atypical antipsychotic, was approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. It is an alternative treatment option to aripiprazole, and when compared with aripiprazole, lurasidone was associated with improved symptom reduction and reduced risk of weight gain and relapse. We conducted a cost-utility analysis of lurasidone versus aripiprazole from the perspective of healthcare services, using Scotland and Wales as specific case studies. METHODS: A 10-year Markov model, incorporating a 6-week acute phase and a maintenance phase across three health states (discontinuation, relapse, death) was constructed. Six-week probabilities of discontinuation and adverse events were based on a published independent mixed-treatment comparison; long-term risks of relapse and discontinuation were from an indirect comparison. Costs included drug therapy, relapse, and outpatient, primary and residential care. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5 %. Utility estimates were taken from published literature, and cost effectiveness was expressed as total 10-year incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: Lurasidone yielded a cost saving of £3383 and an improvement of 0.005 QALYs versus aripiprazole, in Scotland. Deterministic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that results were sensitive to relapse rates, while probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that lurasidone had the highest expected net benefit at willingness-to-pay thresholds of £20,000–30,000 per QALY. The probability that lurasidone was a cost-effective treatment strategy was approximately 75 % at all willingness-to-pay thresholds, with similar results being obtained for the Welsh analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that lurasidone would provide an effective, cost-saving alternative for the healthcare service in the treatment of adult patients with schizophrenia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0405-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-04-11 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4901121/ /pubmed/27067724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0405-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Rajagopalan, Krithika
Trueman, David
Crowe, Lydia
Squirrell, Daniel
Loebel, Antony
Cost-Utility Analysis of Lurasidone Versus Aripiprazole in Adults with Schizophrenia
title Cost-Utility Analysis of Lurasidone Versus Aripiprazole in Adults with Schizophrenia
title_full Cost-Utility Analysis of Lurasidone Versus Aripiprazole in Adults with Schizophrenia
title_fullStr Cost-Utility Analysis of Lurasidone Versus Aripiprazole in Adults with Schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Utility Analysis of Lurasidone Versus Aripiprazole in Adults with Schizophrenia
title_short Cost-Utility Analysis of Lurasidone Versus Aripiprazole in Adults with Schizophrenia
title_sort cost-utility analysis of lurasidone versus aripiprazole in adults with schizophrenia
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0405-0
work_keys_str_mv AT rajagopalankrithika costutilityanalysisoflurasidoneversusaripiprazoleinadultswithschizophrenia
AT truemandavid costutilityanalysisoflurasidoneversusaripiprazoleinadultswithschizophrenia
AT crowelydia costutilityanalysisoflurasidoneversusaripiprazoleinadultswithschizophrenia
AT squirrelldaniel costutilityanalysisoflurasidoneversusaripiprazoleinadultswithschizophrenia
AT loebelantony costutilityanalysisoflurasidoneversusaripiprazoleinadultswithschizophrenia