Cargando…

Can advanced new radiation therapy technologies improve outcome of high grade glioma (HGG) patients? analysis of 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients treated with surgery, concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) compared with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in patients with newly diagnosed high grade glioma in terms of toxicity, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: From March 2004 to October 2014, 34...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Navarria, Pierina, Pessina, Federico, Cozzi, Luca, Ascolese, Anna Maria, Lobefalo, Francesca, Stravato, Antonella, D’Agostino, Giuseppe, Franzese, Ciro, Caroli, Manuela, Bello, Lorenzo, Scorsetti, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2399-6
_version_ 1782436800258637824
author Navarria, Pierina
Pessina, Federico
Cozzi, Luca
Ascolese, Anna Maria
Lobefalo, Francesca
Stravato, Antonella
D’Agostino, Giuseppe
Franzese, Ciro
Caroli, Manuela
Bello, Lorenzo
Scorsetti, Marta
author_facet Navarria, Pierina
Pessina, Federico
Cozzi, Luca
Ascolese, Anna Maria
Lobefalo, Francesca
Stravato, Antonella
D’Agostino, Giuseppe
Franzese, Ciro
Caroli, Manuela
Bello, Lorenzo
Scorsetti, Marta
author_sort Navarria, Pierina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) compared with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in patients with newly diagnosed high grade glioma in terms of toxicity, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: From March 2004 to October 2014, 341 patients underwent surgery followed by concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. From 2003 to 2010, 167 patients were treated using 3DCRT; starting from 2011, 174 patients underwent VMAT. The quantitative evaluation of the treatment plans was performed by means of standard dose volume histogram analysis. Response was recorded using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria and toxicities graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event version 4.0. RESULTS: Both techniques achieved an adequate dose conformity to the target. The median follow up time was 1.3 years; at the last observation 76 patients (23.4 %) were alive and 249 (76.6 %) dead (16 patients were lot to follow-up). For patients who underwent 3DCRT, the median PFS was 0.99 ± 0.07 years (CI95: 0.9–1.1 years); the 1 and 3 years PFS were, 49.6 ± 4 and 19.1 ± 3.1 %. This shall be compared, respectively, to 1.29 ± 0.13 years (CI95: 1.01–1.5 years), 60.8 ± 3.8, and 29.7 ± 4.6 % for patients who underwent VMAT (p = 0.02). The median OS for 3DCRT patients was 1.21 ± 0.09 years (CI95:1.03–1.3 years); 1 and 5 year OS was, 63.3 ± 3.8 and 21.5 ± 3.3 %. The corresponding results for 3DRCT patients were 1.56 ± 0.09 years (CI95:1.37–1.74 years), 73.4 ± 3.5, 30 ± 4.6 % respectively (p < 0.01). In both groups, prognostic factors conditioning PFS and OS were age, gender, KPS, histology and extent of resection (EOR). CONCLUSIONS: VMAT resulted superior to 3DCRT in terms of dosimetric findings and clinical results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4901414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49014142016-06-11 Can advanced new radiation therapy technologies improve outcome of high grade glioma (HGG) patients? analysis of 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients treated with surgery, concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy Navarria, Pierina Pessina, Federico Cozzi, Luca Ascolese, Anna Maria Lobefalo, Francesca Stravato, Antonella D’Agostino, Giuseppe Franzese, Ciro Caroli, Manuela Bello, Lorenzo Scorsetti, Marta BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) compared with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in patients with newly diagnosed high grade glioma in terms of toxicity, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: From March 2004 to October 2014, 341 patients underwent surgery followed by concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. From 2003 to 2010, 167 patients were treated using 3DCRT; starting from 2011, 174 patients underwent VMAT. The quantitative evaluation of the treatment plans was performed by means of standard dose volume histogram analysis. Response was recorded using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria and toxicities graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event version 4.0. RESULTS: Both techniques achieved an adequate dose conformity to the target. The median follow up time was 1.3 years; at the last observation 76 patients (23.4 %) were alive and 249 (76.6 %) dead (16 patients were lot to follow-up). For patients who underwent 3DCRT, the median PFS was 0.99 ± 0.07 years (CI95: 0.9–1.1 years); the 1 and 3 years PFS were, 49.6 ± 4 and 19.1 ± 3.1 %. This shall be compared, respectively, to 1.29 ± 0.13 years (CI95: 1.01–1.5 years), 60.8 ± 3.8, and 29.7 ± 4.6 % for patients who underwent VMAT (p = 0.02). The median OS for 3DCRT patients was 1.21 ± 0.09 years (CI95:1.03–1.3 years); 1 and 5 year OS was, 63.3 ± 3.8 and 21.5 ± 3.3 %. The corresponding results for 3DRCT patients were 1.56 ± 0.09 years (CI95:1.37–1.74 years), 73.4 ± 3.5, 30 ± 4.6 % respectively (p < 0.01). In both groups, prognostic factors conditioning PFS and OS were age, gender, KPS, histology and extent of resection (EOR). CONCLUSIONS: VMAT resulted superior to 3DCRT in terms of dosimetric findings and clinical results. BioMed Central 2016-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4901414/ /pubmed/27287048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2399-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Navarria, Pierina
Pessina, Federico
Cozzi, Luca
Ascolese, Anna Maria
Lobefalo, Francesca
Stravato, Antonella
D’Agostino, Giuseppe
Franzese, Ciro
Caroli, Manuela
Bello, Lorenzo
Scorsetti, Marta
Can advanced new radiation therapy technologies improve outcome of high grade glioma (HGG) patients? analysis of 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients treated with surgery, concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy
title Can advanced new radiation therapy technologies improve outcome of high grade glioma (HGG) patients? analysis of 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients treated with surgery, concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy
title_full Can advanced new radiation therapy technologies improve outcome of high grade glioma (HGG) patients? analysis of 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients treated with surgery, concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy
title_fullStr Can advanced new radiation therapy technologies improve outcome of high grade glioma (HGG) patients? analysis of 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients treated with surgery, concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Can advanced new radiation therapy technologies improve outcome of high grade glioma (HGG) patients? analysis of 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients treated with surgery, concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy
title_short Can advanced new radiation therapy technologies improve outcome of high grade glioma (HGG) patients? analysis of 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients treated with surgery, concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy
title_sort can advanced new radiation therapy technologies improve outcome of high grade glioma (hgg) patients? analysis of 3d-conformal radiotherapy (3dcrt) versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy (vmat) in patients treated with surgery, concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2399-6
work_keys_str_mv AT navarriapierina canadvancednewradiationtherapytechnologiesimproveoutcomeofhighgradegliomahggpatientsanalysisof3dconformalradiotherapy3dcrtversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatinpatientstreatedwithsurgeryconcomitantandadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT pessinafederico canadvancednewradiationtherapytechnologiesimproveoutcomeofhighgradegliomahggpatientsanalysisof3dconformalradiotherapy3dcrtversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatinpatientstreatedwithsurgeryconcomitantandadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT cozziluca canadvancednewradiationtherapytechnologiesimproveoutcomeofhighgradegliomahggpatientsanalysisof3dconformalradiotherapy3dcrtversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatinpatientstreatedwithsurgeryconcomitantandadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT ascoleseannamaria canadvancednewradiationtherapytechnologiesimproveoutcomeofhighgradegliomahggpatientsanalysisof3dconformalradiotherapy3dcrtversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatinpatientstreatedwithsurgeryconcomitantandadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT lobefalofrancesca canadvancednewradiationtherapytechnologiesimproveoutcomeofhighgradegliomahggpatientsanalysisof3dconformalradiotherapy3dcrtversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatinpatientstreatedwithsurgeryconcomitantandadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT stravatoantonella canadvancednewradiationtherapytechnologiesimproveoutcomeofhighgradegliomahggpatientsanalysisof3dconformalradiotherapy3dcrtversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatinpatientstreatedwithsurgeryconcomitantandadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT dagostinogiuseppe canadvancednewradiationtherapytechnologiesimproveoutcomeofhighgradegliomahggpatientsanalysisof3dconformalradiotherapy3dcrtversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatinpatientstreatedwithsurgeryconcomitantandadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT franzeseciro canadvancednewradiationtherapytechnologiesimproveoutcomeofhighgradegliomahggpatientsanalysisof3dconformalradiotherapy3dcrtversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatinpatientstreatedwithsurgeryconcomitantandadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT carolimanuela canadvancednewradiationtherapytechnologiesimproveoutcomeofhighgradegliomahggpatientsanalysisof3dconformalradiotherapy3dcrtversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatinpatientstreatedwithsurgeryconcomitantandadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT bellolorenzo canadvancednewradiationtherapytechnologiesimproveoutcomeofhighgradegliomahggpatientsanalysisof3dconformalradiotherapy3dcrtversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatinpatientstreatedwithsurgeryconcomitantandadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT scorsettimarta canadvancednewradiationtherapytechnologiesimproveoutcomeofhighgradegliomahggpatientsanalysisof3dconformalradiotherapy3dcrtversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatinpatientstreatedwithsurgeryconcomitantandadjuvantchemoradiotherapy