Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”

With great interest we read the article by Kelly et al. on the measurement of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) (Kelly P et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:(1) 32, 2016). We appreciate the invitation of the authors to provide feedback on their ideas and we take this opportunity to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terwee, Caroline B., Mokkink, L. B., Hidding, L. M., Altenburg, T. M., van Poppel, M. N., Chinapaw, M. J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8
_version_ 1782436811345231872
author Terwee, Caroline B.
Mokkink, L. B.
Hidding, L. M.
Altenburg, T. M.
van Poppel, M. N.
Chinapaw, M. J. M.
author_facet Terwee, Caroline B.
Mokkink, L. B.
Hidding, L. M.
Altenburg, T. M.
van Poppel, M. N.
Chinapaw, M. J. M.
author_sort Terwee, Caroline B.
collection PubMed
description With great interest we read the article by Kelly et al. on the measurement of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) (Kelly P et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:(1) 32, 2016). We appreciate the invitation of the authors to provide feedback on their ideas and we take this opportunity to contribute to the discussion. Our main proposition is that this field can learn much from the field of quality of life research and the methodology developed for validating quality of life questionnaires.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4901471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49014712016-06-11 Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered” Terwee, Caroline B. Mokkink, L. B. Hidding, L. M. Altenburg, T. M. van Poppel, M. N. Chinapaw, M. J. M. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Commentary With great interest we read the article by Kelly et al. on the measurement of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) (Kelly P et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:(1) 32, 2016). We appreciate the invitation of the authors to provide feedback on their ideas and we take this opportunity to contribute to the discussion. Our main proposition is that this field can learn much from the field of quality of life research and the methodology developed for validating quality of life questionnaires. BioMed Central 2016-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4901471/ /pubmed/27287522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Terwee, Caroline B.
Mokkink, L. B.
Hidding, L. M.
Altenburg, T. M.
van Poppel, M. N.
Chinapaw, M. J. M.
Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”
title Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”
title_full Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”
title_fullStr Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”
title_full_unstemmed Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”
title_short Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”
title_sort comment on “should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? validity and reliability reconsidered”
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8
work_keys_str_mv AT terweecarolineb commentonshouldwereframehowwethinkaboutphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviormeasurementvalidityandreliabilityreconsidered
AT mokkinklb commentonshouldwereframehowwethinkaboutphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviormeasurementvalidityandreliabilityreconsidered
AT hiddinglm commentonshouldwereframehowwethinkaboutphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviormeasurementvalidityandreliabilityreconsidered
AT altenburgtm commentonshouldwereframehowwethinkaboutphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviormeasurementvalidityandreliabilityreconsidered
AT vanpoppelmn commentonshouldwereframehowwethinkaboutphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviormeasurementvalidityandreliabilityreconsidered
AT chinapawmjm commentonshouldwereframehowwethinkaboutphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviormeasurementvalidityandreliabilityreconsidered

Ejemplares similares