Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes Following Revision Shoulder Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Stabilization

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients following revision shoulder arthroscopic capsulolabral stabilization. The hypothesis was that revision arthroscopic stabilization would offer predictable clinical outcomes in appropriately selected patients. METHODS: S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Jason J., Mascarenhas, Randhir, Yanke, Adam Blair, Nicholson, Gregory P., Cole, Brian J., Romeo, Anthony A., Verma, Nikhil N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901568/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00012
_version_ 1782436831325847552
author Shin, Jason J.
Mascarenhas, Randhir
Yanke, Adam Blair
Nicholson, Gregory P.
Cole, Brian J.
Romeo, Anthony A.
Verma, Nikhil N.
author_facet Shin, Jason J.
Mascarenhas, Randhir
Yanke, Adam Blair
Nicholson, Gregory P.
Cole, Brian J.
Romeo, Anthony A.
Verma, Nikhil N.
author_sort Shin, Jason J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients following revision shoulder arthroscopic capsulolabral stabilization. The hypothesis was that revision arthroscopic stabilization would offer predictable clinical outcomes in appropriately selected patients. METHODS: Sixty-two patients (63 shoulders) with failure of primary instability repairs were treated with revision arthroscopic shoulder stabilization at a mean follow-up of 46.9 ± 16.8 months (range, 15-78). Forty-six male patients and 16 females with a mean age of 23.2 ± 6.9 years (range, 14.7 - 47.2) met the inclusion criteria for the study. Revision arthroscopic stabilization was indicated in patients with recurrent instability with limited glenoid bone loss. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using validated patient reported outcome questionnaires including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, visual analog pain scale and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. In addition, patients were queried for recurrent instability events (subluxation or dislocation) or revision surgery. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the mean post-operative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability normalized score was 80.1 (range, 15.0 - 100). There were clinically significant improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores from 63.7 pre-operatively to 85.1 post-operatively (P < 0.001), Simple Shoulder Test scores from 61.8 pre-operatively to 90.9 post-operatively (P < 0.001), and VAS pain scores from 2.89 pre-operatively to 0.81 post-operatively (P < 0.001). Recurrent instability occurred in 12 shoulders (19.0 %), with number of prior surgeries and hyperlaxity found to be significant risk factor for failure (P < 0.001 and P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic revision stabilization of the shoulder can result in satisfactory outcomes in patients who have failed previous capsulolabral repair. Increased number of prior surgeries and hyperlaxity are predictive of poor outcome. Longer-term studies are required to determine whether similar results are maintained over time, and to provide guidance on focused clinical indications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4901568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49015682016-06-10 Clinical Outcomes Following Revision Shoulder Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Stabilization Shin, Jason J. Mascarenhas, Randhir Yanke, Adam Blair Nicholson, Gregory P. Cole, Brian J. Romeo, Anthony A. Verma, Nikhil N. Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients following revision shoulder arthroscopic capsulolabral stabilization. The hypothesis was that revision arthroscopic stabilization would offer predictable clinical outcomes in appropriately selected patients. METHODS: Sixty-two patients (63 shoulders) with failure of primary instability repairs were treated with revision arthroscopic shoulder stabilization at a mean follow-up of 46.9 ± 16.8 months (range, 15-78). Forty-six male patients and 16 females with a mean age of 23.2 ± 6.9 years (range, 14.7 - 47.2) met the inclusion criteria for the study. Revision arthroscopic stabilization was indicated in patients with recurrent instability with limited glenoid bone loss. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using validated patient reported outcome questionnaires including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, visual analog pain scale and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. In addition, patients were queried for recurrent instability events (subluxation or dislocation) or revision surgery. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the mean post-operative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability normalized score was 80.1 (range, 15.0 - 100). There were clinically significant improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores from 63.7 pre-operatively to 85.1 post-operatively (P < 0.001), Simple Shoulder Test scores from 61.8 pre-operatively to 90.9 post-operatively (P < 0.001), and VAS pain scores from 2.89 pre-operatively to 0.81 post-operatively (P < 0.001). Recurrent instability occurred in 12 shoulders (19.0 %), with number of prior surgeries and hyperlaxity found to be significant risk factor for failure (P < 0.001 and P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic revision stabilization of the shoulder can result in satisfactory outcomes in patients who have failed previous capsulolabral repair. Increased number of prior surgeries and hyperlaxity are predictive of poor outcome. Longer-term studies are required to determine whether similar results are maintained over time, and to provide guidance on focused clinical indications. SAGE Publications 2015-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4901568/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00012 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Shin, Jason J.
Mascarenhas, Randhir
Yanke, Adam Blair
Nicholson, Gregory P.
Cole, Brian J.
Romeo, Anthony A.
Verma, Nikhil N.
Clinical Outcomes Following Revision Shoulder Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Stabilization
title Clinical Outcomes Following Revision Shoulder Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Stabilization
title_full Clinical Outcomes Following Revision Shoulder Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Stabilization
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes Following Revision Shoulder Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Stabilization
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes Following Revision Shoulder Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Stabilization
title_short Clinical Outcomes Following Revision Shoulder Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Stabilization
title_sort clinical outcomes following revision shoulder arthroscopic capsulolabral stabilization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901568/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00012
work_keys_str_mv AT shinjasonj clinicaloutcomesfollowingrevisionshoulderarthroscopiccapsulolabralstabilization
AT mascarenhasrandhir clinicaloutcomesfollowingrevisionshoulderarthroscopiccapsulolabralstabilization
AT yankeadamblair clinicaloutcomesfollowingrevisionshoulderarthroscopiccapsulolabralstabilization
AT nicholsongregoryp clinicaloutcomesfollowingrevisionshoulderarthroscopiccapsulolabralstabilization
AT colebrianj clinicaloutcomesfollowingrevisionshoulderarthroscopiccapsulolabralstabilization
AT romeoanthonya clinicaloutcomesfollowingrevisionshoulderarthroscopiccapsulolabralstabilization
AT vermanikhiln clinicaloutcomesfollowingrevisionshoulderarthroscopiccapsulolabralstabilization