Cargando…

Importance Of Donor Chondrocyte Viability in Osteochondral Allografting

OBJECTIVES: Osteochondral allografting (OCA) provides a biologic treatment option for functional restoration of large articular cartilage defects in multiple joints. While successful outcomes after OCA have been linked to viable donor chondrocytes, the importance of donor cell viability has not been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stannard, James P., Cook, James L., Stoker, Aaron M., Bozynski, Chantelle C., Kuroki, Keiichi, Cook, Cristi R., Pfeiffer, Ferris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901624/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00067
_version_ 1782436842713382912
author Stannard, James P.
Cook, James L.
Stoker, Aaron M.
Bozynski, Chantelle C.
Kuroki, Keiichi
Cook, Cristi R.
Pfeiffer, Ferris
author_facet Stannard, James P.
Cook, James L.
Stoker, Aaron M.
Bozynski, Chantelle C.
Kuroki, Keiichi
Cook, Cristi R.
Pfeiffer, Ferris
author_sort Stannard, James P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Osteochondral allografting (OCA) provides a biologic treatment option for functional restoration of large articular cartilage defects in multiple joints. While successful outcomes after OCA have been linked to viable donor chondrocytes, the importance of donor cell viability has not been comprehensively validated. The purpose of this study was to use a canine model to determine the importance of donor chondrocyte viability at the time of implantation with respect to functional success of femoral condylar OCAs based on gross, cell viability, histologic, biochemical, and biomechanical outcome measures. METHODS: With IACUC approval, adult female dogs (n = 16) were implanted with 8-mm cylindrical osteochondral allografts from male dogs in the lateral and medial femoral condyles of one knee. Osteochondral allografts were preserved for 28 or 60 days after procurement and chondrocyte viability was quantified prior to implantation. Two different storage media, temperatures and time points were used in order to obtain a spectrum of %chondrocyte viability at the time of implantation. A successful outcome was defined as an osteochondral allograft that was associated with graft integration, maintenance of hyaline cartilage, lack of associated cartilage disorder, and lack of fibrillation, fissuring, or fibrous tissue infiltration of the allograft based on subjective radiographic, arthroscopic, gross, and histologic assessments at 6 months after implantation. RESULTS: Chondrocyte viability ranged from 23% to 99% at the time of implantation. All successful grafts had greater than 70% chondrocyte viability at the time of implantation and no graft with chondrocyte viability <70% was associated with a successful outcome. Live-dead stained sections and histologic findings with respect to cell morphology suggested that successful grafts were consistently comprised of viable chondrocytes in lacunae, while grafts that were not successful were comprised of non-viable chondrocytes with infiltration of fibroblasts from the surrounding recipient tissues. In situ PCR (FISH) assays were performed in an attempt to distinguish donor (male) cells from recipient (female) cells. Unfortunately, this technique was exceptionally difficult to perform on intact articular cartilage sections, and consistent, repeatable data could not be obtained from this testing. However, the data did support histologic and live-dead data, which strongly suggested that successful grafts retained viable donor (male) chondrocytes and unsuccessful grafts degraded and were replaced by fibrous tissue populated with recipient (female) fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: Viable chondrocytes in osteochondral allografts at the time of transplantation are primarily responsible for maintenance of donor articular cartilage health long term. Optimizing chondrocyte viability in all aspects of osteochondral allografting - including procurement, processing, storage, transportation, and surgical implantation - needs to be a primary focus for clinical use of OCA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4901624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49016242016-06-10 Importance Of Donor Chondrocyte Viability in Osteochondral Allografting Stannard, James P. Cook, James L. Stoker, Aaron M. Bozynski, Chantelle C. Kuroki, Keiichi Cook, Cristi R. Pfeiffer, Ferris Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Osteochondral allografting (OCA) provides a biologic treatment option for functional restoration of large articular cartilage defects in multiple joints. While successful outcomes after OCA have been linked to viable donor chondrocytes, the importance of donor cell viability has not been comprehensively validated. The purpose of this study was to use a canine model to determine the importance of donor chondrocyte viability at the time of implantation with respect to functional success of femoral condylar OCAs based on gross, cell viability, histologic, biochemical, and biomechanical outcome measures. METHODS: With IACUC approval, adult female dogs (n = 16) were implanted with 8-mm cylindrical osteochondral allografts from male dogs in the lateral and medial femoral condyles of one knee. Osteochondral allografts were preserved for 28 or 60 days after procurement and chondrocyte viability was quantified prior to implantation. Two different storage media, temperatures and time points were used in order to obtain a spectrum of %chondrocyte viability at the time of implantation. A successful outcome was defined as an osteochondral allograft that was associated with graft integration, maintenance of hyaline cartilage, lack of associated cartilage disorder, and lack of fibrillation, fissuring, or fibrous tissue infiltration of the allograft based on subjective radiographic, arthroscopic, gross, and histologic assessments at 6 months after implantation. RESULTS: Chondrocyte viability ranged from 23% to 99% at the time of implantation. All successful grafts had greater than 70% chondrocyte viability at the time of implantation and no graft with chondrocyte viability <70% was associated with a successful outcome. Live-dead stained sections and histologic findings with respect to cell morphology suggested that successful grafts were consistently comprised of viable chondrocytes in lacunae, while grafts that were not successful were comprised of non-viable chondrocytes with infiltration of fibroblasts from the surrounding recipient tissues. In situ PCR (FISH) assays were performed in an attempt to distinguish donor (male) cells from recipient (female) cells. Unfortunately, this technique was exceptionally difficult to perform on intact articular cartilage sections, and consistent, repeatable data could not be obtained from this testing. However, the data did support histologic and live-dead data, which strongly suggested that successful grafts retained viable donor (male) chondrocytes and unsuccessful grafts degraded and were replaced by fibrous tissue populated with recipient (female) fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: Viable chondrocytes in osteochondral allografts at the time of transplantation are primarily responsible for maintenance of donor articular cartilage health long term. Optimizing chondrocyte viability in all aspects of osteochondral allografting - including procurement, processing, storage, transportation, and surgical implantation - needs to be a primary focus for clinical use of OCA. SAGE Publications 2015-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4901624/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00067 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Stannard, James P.
Cook, James L.
Stoker, Aaron M.
Bozynski, Chantelle C.
Kuroki, Keiichi
Cook, Cristi R.
Pfeiffer, Ferris
Importance Of Donor Chondrocyte Viability in Osteochondral Allografting
title Importance Of Donor Chondrocyte Viability in Osteochondral Allografting
title_full Importance Of Donor Chondrocyte Viability in Osteochondral Allografting
title_fullStr Importance Of Donor Chondrocyte Viability in Osteochondral Allografting
title_full_unstemmed Importance Of Donor Chondrocyte Viability in Osteochondral Allografting
title_short Importance Of Donor Chondrocyte Viability in Osteochondral Allografting
title_sort importance of donor chondrocyte viability in osteochondral allografting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901624/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00067
work_keys_str_mv AT stannardjamesp importanceofdonorchondrocyteviabilityinosteochondralallografting
AT cookjamesl importanceofdonorchondrocyteviabilityinosteochondralallografting
AT stokeraaronm importanceofdonorchondrocyteviabilityinosteochondralallografting
AT bozynskichantellec importanceofdonorchondrocyteviabilityinosteochondralallografting
AT kurokikeiichi importanceofdonorchondrocyteviabilityinosteochondralallografting
AT cookcristir importanceofdonorchondrocyteviabilityinosteochondralallografting
AT pfeifferferris importanceofdonorchondrocyteviabilityinosteochondralallografting