Cargando…
Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention
BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive performance may be a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury, and may influence risk via changes in neuromuscular performance; however, there are no existing data the relationship between neurocognition and neuromuscular performance during complex athletic tasks....
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901652/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00095 |
_version_ | 1782436848548708352 |
---|---|
author | Herman, Daniel C. Barth, Jeffrey C. |
author_facet | Herman, Daniel C. Barth, Jeffrey C. |
author_sort | Herman, Daniel C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive performance may be a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury, and may influence risk via changes in neuromuscular performance; however, there are no existing data the relationship between neurocognition and neuromuscular performance during complex athletic tasks. Hypothesis: Athletes with low baseline neurocognitive performance would demonstrate worse neuromuscular performance during the completion of an unanticipated jump landing task compared to athletes with high baseline neurocognitive performance. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: 3-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data of the dominant limb were collected for 37 recreational athletes while performing an unanticipated jump landing task. Subjects were screened using a computer-based neurocognitive test into high (HP) and low (LP) performing groups (HP=20, LP=17). The task consisted of a forward jump onto a force plate with an immediate jump to a second target that was assigned 250msec prior to landing on the force plate. Kinematic and kinetic data were obtained during the first jump landing. RESULTS: The LP group (Mean±SD of LP vs HP) demonstrated significantly altered neuromuscular performance during the landing phase while completing the jump landing task, including significantly increased peak vertical ground reaction force (1.81±0.53BW vs 1.38±0.37BW, p<0.01), peak anterior tibial shear force (0.91±0.17BW vs 0.72±0.22BW, p<0.01), knee abduction moment (0.47±0.56BW*BH vs 0.03±0.64BW*BH, p=0.03), and knee abduction angle (6.1±4.7o vs 1.3±5.6o, p=0.03), and well as decreased trunk flexion angle (9.6±9.6o vs 16.4±11.2o, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Athletes with lower levels of baseline neurocognition possess worse neuromuscular performance during a challenging jump landing task. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Neurocognitive testing and neuromuscular assessment during dual-attention conditions may improve anterior cruciate ligament injury risk screening, while incorporating neurocognitive challenges into neuromuscular-based training programs may improve injury prevention and rehabilitation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4901652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49016522016-06-10 Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention Herman, Daniel C. Barth, Jeffrey C. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive performance may be a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury, and may influence risk via changes in neuromuscular performance; however, there are no existing data the relationship between neurocognition and neuromuscular performance during complex athletic tasks. Hypothesis: Athletes with low baseline neurocognitive performance would demonstrate worse neuromuscular performance during the completion of an unanticipated jump landing task compared to athletes with high baseline neurocognitive performance. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: 3-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data of the dominant limb were collected for 37 recreational athletes while performing an unanticipated jump landing task. Subjects were screened using a computer-based neurocognitive test into high (HP) and low (LP) performing groups (HP=20, LP=17). The task consisted of a forward jump onto a force plate with an immediate jump to a second target that was assigned 250msec prior to landing on the force plate. Kinematic and kinetic data were obtained during the first jump landing. RESULTS: The LP group (Mean±SD of LP vs HP) demonstrated significantly altered neuromuscular performance during the landing phase while completing the jump landing task, including significantly increased peak vertical ground reaction force (1.81±0.53BW vs 1.38±0.37BW, p<0.01), peak anterior tibial shear force (0.91±0.17BW vs 0.72±0.22BW, p<0.01), knee abduction moment (0.47±0.56BW*BH vs 0.03±0.64BW*BH, p=0.03), and knee abduction angle (6.1±4.7o vs 1.3±5.6o, p=0.03), and well as decreased trunk flexion angle (9.6±9.6o vs 16.4±11.2o, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Athletes with lower levels of baseline neurocognition possess worse neuromuscular performance during a challenging jump landing task. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Neurocognitive testing and neuromuscular assessment during dual-attention conditions may improve anterior cruciate ligament injury risk screening, while incorporating neurocognitive challenges into neuromuscular-based training programs may improve injury prevention and rehabilitation. SAGE Publications 2015-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4901652/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00095 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav. |
spellingShingle | Article Herman, Daniel C. Barth, Jeffrey C. Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention |
title | Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention |
title_full | Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention |
title_fullStr | Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention |
title_full_unstemmed | Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention |
title_short | Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention |
title_sort | neuromuscular performance varies with baseline neurocognition: implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury risk and prevention |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901652/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00095 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hermandanielc neuromuscularperformancevarieswithbaselineneurocognitionimplicationsforanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryriskandprevention AT barthjeffreyc neuromuscularperformancevarieswithbaselineneurocognitionimplicationsforanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryriskandprevention |