Cargando…

Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention

BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive performance may be a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury, and may influence risk via changes in neuromuscular performance; however, there are no existing data the relationship between neurocognition and neuromuscular performance during complex athletic tasks....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herman, Daniel C., Barth, Jeffrey C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901652/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00095
_version_ 1782436848548708352
author Herman, Daniel C.
Barth, Jeffrey C.
author_facet Herman, Daniel C.
Barth, Jeffrey C.
author_sort Herman, Daniel C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive performance may be a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury, and may influence risk via changes in neuromuscular performance; however, there are no existing data the relationship between neurocognition and neuromuscular performance during complex athletic tasks. Hypothesis: Athletes with low baseline neurocognitive performance would demonstrate worse neuromuscular performance during the completion of an unanticipated jump landing task compared to athletes with high baseline neurocognitive performance. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: 3-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data of the dominant limb were collected for 37 recreational athletes while performing an unanticipated jump landing task. Subjects were screened using a computer-based neurocognitive test into high (HP) and low (LP) performing groups (HP=20, LP=17). The task consisted of a forward jump onto a force plate with an immediate jump to a second target that was assigned 250msec prior to landing on the force plate. Kinematic and kinetic data were obtained during the first jump landing. RESULTS: The LP group (Mean±SD of LP vs HP) demonstrated significantly altered neuromuscular performance during the landing phase while completing the jump landing task, including significantly increased peak vertical ground reaction force (1.81±0.53BW vs 1.38±0.37BW, p<0.01), peak anterior tibial shear force (0.91±0.17BW vs 0.72±0.22BW, p<0.01), knee abduction moment (0.47±0.56BW*BH vs 0.03±0.64BW*BH, p=0.03), and knee abduction angle (6.1±4.7o vs 1.3±5.6o, p=0.03), and well as decreased trunk flexion angle (9.6±9.6o vs 16.4±11.2o, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Athletes with lower levels of baseline neurocognition possess worse neuromuscular performance during a challenging jump landing task. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Neurocognitive testing and neuromuscular assessment during dual-attention conditions may improve anterior cruciate ligament injury risk screening, while incorporating neurocognitive challenges into neuromuscular-based training programs may improve injury prevention and rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4901652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49016522016-06-10 Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention Herman, Daniel C. Barth, Jeffrey C. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive performance may be a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury, and may influence risk via changes in neuromuscular performance; however, there are no existing data the relationship between neurocognition and neuromuscular performance during complex athletic tasks. Hypothesis: Athletes with low baseline neurocognitive performance would demonstrate worse neuromuscular performance during the completion of an unanticipated jump landing task compared to athletes with high baseline neurocognitive performance. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: 3-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data of the dominant limb were collected for 37 recreational athletes while performing an unanticipated jump landing task. Subjects were screened using a computer-based neurocognitive test into high (HP) and low (LP) performing groups (HP=20, LP=17). The task consisted of a forward jump onto a force plate with an immediate jump to a second target that was assigned 250msec prior to landing on the force plate. Kinematic and kinetic data were obtained during the first jump landing. RESULTS: The LP group (Mean±SD of LP vs HP) demonstrated significantly altered neuromuscular performance during the landing phase while completing the jump landing task, including significantly increased peak vertical ground reaction force (1.81±0.53BW vs 1.38±0.37BW, p<0.01), peak anterior tibial shear force (0.91±0.17BW vs 0.72±0.22BW, p<0.01), knee abduction moment (0.47±0.56BW*BH vs 0.03±0.64BW*BH, p=0.03), and knee abduction angle (6.1±4.7o vs 1.3±5.6o, p=0.03), and well as decreased trunk flexion angle (9.6±9.6o vs 16.4±11.2o, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Athletes with lower levels of baseline neurocognition possess worse neuromuscular performance during a challenging jump landing task. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Neurocognitive testing and neuromuscular assessment during dual-attention conditions may improve anterior cruciate ligament injury risk screening, while incorporating neurocognitive challenges into neuromuscular-based training programs may improve injury prevention and rehabilitation. SAGE Publications 2015-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4901652/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00095 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Herman, Daniel C.
Barth, Jeffrey C.
Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention
title Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention
title_full Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention
title_fullStr Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention
title_full_unstemmed Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention
title_short Neuromuscular Performance Varies with Baseline Neurocognition: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Prevention
title_sort neuromuscular performance varies with baseline neurocognition: implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury risk and prevention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901652/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00095
work_keys_str_mv AT hermandanielc neuromuscularperformancevarieswithbaselineneurocognitionimplicationsforanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryriskandprevention
AT barthjeffreyc neuromuscularperformancevarieswithbaselineneurocognitionimplicationsforanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryriskandprevention