Cargando…

Dynamometer Elbow Strength and Endurance Testing After Distal Biceps Reconstruction w/Allograft

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study is to investigate the functional strength outcomes of late distal biceps reconstruction using allograft tissue. METHODS: Patients who underwent distal biceps reconstruction with allograft tissue between May 2007 and May 2013 were identified. Charts were r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGee, Alan, Strauss, Eric Jason, Jazrawi, Laith M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901759/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00166
_version_ 1782436867951558656
author McGee, Alan
Strauss, Eric Jason
Jazrawi, Laith M.
author_facet McGee, Alan
Strauss, Eric Jason
Jazrawi, Laith M.
author_sort McGee, Alan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study is to investigate the functional strength outcomes of late distal biceps reconstruction using allograft tissue. METHODS: Patients who underwent distal biceps reconstruction with allograft tissue between May 2007 and May 2013 were identified. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for post-operative complications, gross flexion and supination strength, and range of motion (ROM). Isokinetic strength and endurance in elbow flexion and forearm supination were measured in both arms. Tests were conducted using a dynamometer at 60o per second for isokinetic strength and 240o per second for endurance. Isometric strength testing was also measured for elbow flexion and forearm supination. Paired t tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Ten patients with a mean age of 48 years (range 42 - 61 years) were included in the study. Distal biceps reconstruction was performed using an Achilles tendon allograft in 9 patients and a combination of tibialis anterior allograft and gracilis allograft in 1 patient. Of the reconstructions, 50% involved the dominant arm. Full ROM was observed in all patients at the time of their final follow up assessment. The mean follow-up for dynamometer strength testing was 34 months (range 13-81 months). No statistical differences were noted between data obtained from operative and contralateral extremities. The average peak torque of the operative limb (38.5± 5.9 Nm) was 91.7% of that of the contralateral limb (41.8±4.9 Nm) in flexion and 93.4% (operative, 5.7±1.3 Nm; contralateral, 6.1± 1.0 Nm) in supination. No significant differences were found in fatigue index between operative or contralateral limbs for flexion (operative, 34.1±17.1%; contralateral, 30.8±17.1%; p = 0.29) or supination (operative, 38.2±16.5%; contralateral, 42.1±11.9%; p = 0.65). . The only complication observed was a transient PIN palsy in one patient which resolved by 3 months post-operatively. All patients reported postoperative cosmetic deformity but found their gross appearance acceptable. CONCLUSION: Late reconstruction for chronic distal biceps rupture using allograft tissue is a safe and effective solution for symptomatic patients with functional demands in forearm supination and elbow flexion. Dynamometer testing shows near normal return of strength and endurance of both elbow flexion and supination following the procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4901759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49017592016-06-10 Dynamometer Elbow Strength and Endurance Testing After Distal Biceps Reconstruction w/Allograft McGee, Alan Strauss, Eric Jason Jazrawi, Laith M. Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study is to investigate the functional strength outcomes of late distal biceps reconstruction using allograft tissue. METHODS: Patients who underwent distal biceps reconstruction with allograft tissue between May 2007 and May 2013 were identified. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for post-operative complications, gross flexion and supination strength, and range of motion (ROM). Isokinetic strength and endurance in elbow flexion and forearm supination were measured in both arms. Tests were conducted using a dynamometer at 60o per second for isokinetic strength and 240o per second for endurance. Isometric strength testing was also measured for elbow flexion and forearm supination. Paired t tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Ten patients with a mean age of 48 years (range 42 - 61 years) were included in the study. Distal biceps reconstruction was performed using an Achilles tendon allograft in 9 patients and a combination of tibialis anterior allograft and gracilis allograft in 1 patient. Of the reconstructions, 50% involved the dominant arm. Full ROM was observed in all patients at the time of their final follow up assessment. The mean follow-up for dynamometer strength testing was 34 months (range 13-81 months). No statistical differences were noted between data obtained from operative and contralateral extremities. The average peak torque of the operative limb (38.5± 5.9 Nm) was 91.7% of that of the contralateral limb (41.8±4.9 Nm) in flexion and 93.4% (operative, 5.7±1.3 Nm; contralateral, 6.1± 1.0 Nm) in supination. No significant differences were found in fatigue index between operative or contralateral limbs for flexion (operative, 34.1±17.1%; contralateral, 30.8±17.1%; p = 0.29) or supination (operative, 38.2±16.5%; contralateral, 42.1±11.9%; p = 0.65). . The only complication observed was a transient PIN palsy in one patient which resolved by 3 months post-operatively. All patients reported postoperative cosmetic deformity but found their gross appearance acceptable. CONCLUSION: Late reconstruction for chronic distal biceps rupture using allograft tissue is a safe and effective solution for symptomatic patients with functional demands in forearm supination and elbow flexion. Dynamometer testing shows near normal return of strength and endurance of both elbow flexion and supination following the procedure. SAGE Publications 2015-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4901759/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00166 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
McGee, Alan
Strauss, Eric Jason
Jazrawi, Laith M.
Dynamometer Elbow Strength and Endurance Testing After Distal Biceps Reconstruction w/Allograft
title Dynamometer Elbow Strength and Endurance Testing After Distal Biceps Reconstruction w/Allograft
title_full Dynamometer Elbow Strength and Endurance Testing After Distal Biceps Reconstruction w/Allograft
title_fullStr Dynamometer Elbow Strength and Endurance Testing After Distal Biceps Reconstruction w/Allograft
title_full_unstemmed Dynamometer Elbow Strength and Endurance Testing After Distal Biceps Reconstruction w/Allograft
title_short Dynamometer Elbow Strength and Endurance Testing After Distal Biceps Reconstruction w/Allograft
title_sort dynamometer elbow strength and endurance testing after distal biceps reconstruction w/allograft
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901759/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115S00166
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgeealan dynamometerelbowstrengthandendurancetestingafterdistalbicepsreconstructionwallograft
AT straussericjason dynamometerelbowstrengthandendurancetestingafterdistalbicepsreconstructionwallograft
AT jazrawilaithm dynamometerelbowstrengthandendurancetestingafterdistalbicepsreconstructionwallograft