Cargando…

Are We Getting Any Better? A Study on Repair Integrity in 1600 Consecutive Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs

OBJECTIVES: Post-operative retear is the most common surgical complication following rotator cuff repair with reported rates ranging from 11% to 94%. There have been a number of advancements in the technology and management of rotator cuff repair which may have improved retear rates. The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McColl, Hayden, Lam, Patrick Hong, Murrell, George A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901924/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116S00079
_version_ 1782436898948513792
author McColl, Hayden
Lam, Patrick Hong
Murrell, George A.
author_facet McColl, Hayden
Lam, Patrick Hong
Murrell, George A.
author_sort McColl, Hayden
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Post-operative retear is the most common surgical complication following rotator cuff repair with reported rates ranging from 11% to 94%. There have been a number of advancements in the technology and management of rotator cuff repair which may have improved retear rates. The aim of this study was to determine if there has been any improvements in rotator cuff repair integrity in our centre and, to identify any changes in the management of rotator cuff tears that may have impacted post-operative re tear rate. METHODS: This observational single cohort study used running average analysis to examine 1600 consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by a single surgeon, and had cuff integrity assessed by ultrasound six months post operation. Exclusion criteria included revision rotator cuff repairs, isolated subscapularis repairs, and irreparable tears. RESULTS: Retear rates over the course of our study ranged from 3% to 34%, with the mean retear rate being 15%. The retear rate at the commencement of our study was 18% and decreased to 5% by the end. Reductions in retear were associated with; more passive rehabilitation, more attention to post-operative abduction sling use, increased surgical team experience. Increases in retear rates were associated with; increased false positives with a more sensitive ultrasound machine and, learning curves with new equipment for surgeon and sonographer. CONCLUSION: A significant decrease in retear rate following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was observed over the course of our study with the re-tear rate at the end of the study being 5%. While the study design does not allow us to directly attribute changes in retear rate to changes in management, our results suggest that less aggressive rehabilitation, abduction sling use and increased surgeon experience decrease postoperative retear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4901924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49019242016-06-10 Are We Getting Any Better? A Study on Repair Integrity in 1600 Consecutive Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs McColl, Hayden Lam, Patrick Hong Murrell, George A. Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Post-operative retear is the most common surgical complication following rotator cuff repair with reported rates ranging from 11% to 94%. There have been a number of advancements in the technology and management of rotator cuff repair which may have improved retear rates. The aim of this study was to determine if there has been any improvements in rotator cuff repair integrity in our centre and, to identify any changes in the management of rotator cuff tears that may have impacted post-operative re tear rate. METHODS: This observational single cohort study used running average analysis to examine 1600 consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by a single surgeon, and had cuff integrity assessed by ultrasound six months post operation. Exclusion criteria included revision rotator cuff repairs, isolated subscapularis repairs, and irreparable tears. RESULTS: Retear rates over the course of our study ranged from 3% to 34%, with the mean retear rate being 15%. The retear rate at the commencement of our study was 18% and decreased to 5% by the end. Reductions in retear were associated with; more passive rehabilitation, more attention to post-operative abduction sling use, increased surgical team experience. Increases in retear rates were associated with; increased false positives with a more sensitive ultrasound machine and, learning curves with new equipment for surgeon and sonographer. CONCLUSION: A significant decrease in retear rate following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was observed over the course of our study with the re-tear rate at the end of the study being 5%. While the study design does not allow us to directly attribute changes in retear rate to changes in management, our results suggest that less aggressive rehabilitation, abduction sling use and increased surgeon experience decrease postoperative retear. SAGE Publications 2016-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4901924/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116S00079 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
McColl, Hayden
Lam, Patrick Hong
Murrell, George A.
Are We Getting Any Better? A Study on Repair Integrity in 1600 Consecutive Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs
title Are We Getting Any Better? A Study on Repair Integrity in 1600 Consecutive Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs
title_full Are We Getting Any Better? A Study on Repair Integrity in 1600 Consecutive Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs
title_fullStr Are We Getting Any Better? A Study on Repair Integrity in 1600 Consecutive Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs
title_full_unstemmed Are We Getting Any Better? A Study on Repair Integrity in 1600 Consecutive Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs
title_short Are We Getting Any Better? A Study on Repair Integrity in 1600 Consecutive Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs
title_sort are we getting any better? a study on repair integrity in 1600 consecutive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4901924/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116S00079
work_keys_str_mv AT mccollhayden arewegettinganybetterastudyonrepairintegrityin1600consecutivearthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairs
AT lampatrickhong arewegettinganybetterastudyonrepairintegrityin1600consecutivearthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairs
AT murrellgeorgea arewegettinganybetterastudyonrepairintegrityin1600consecutivearthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairs