Cargando…

The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: reliability and validity of a one-page questionnaire following surveys in three patient populations

BACKGROUND: This study developed and tested the reliability and validity of the Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire (UPC-Q). METHODS: The UPC-Q developed in this study has three parts: 1) the aspects that patients consider the most important when receiving a relevant health care service, ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bjertnaes, Oyvind, Iversen, Hilde Hestad, Holmboe, Olaf, Danielsen, Kirsten, Garratt, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350761
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S102732
_version_ 1782436937655648256
author Bjertnaes, Oyvind
Iversen, Hilde Hestad
Holmboe, Olaf
Danielsen, Kirsten
Garratt, Andrew
author_facet Bjertnaes, Oyvind
Iversen, Hilde Hestad
Holmboe, Olaf
Danielsen, Kirsten
Garratt, Andrew
author_sort Bjertnaes, Oyvind
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study developed and tested the reliability and validity of the Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire (UPC-Q). METHODS: The UPC-Q developed in this study has three parts: 1) the aspects that patients consider the most important when receiving a relevant health care service, rating the health care services on these aspects and their prioritization, 2) the overall experiences of patients using the relevant health care service, and 3) suggestions for improvements. The UPC-Q was tested in four different patient-experience surveys in 2015, including psychiatric inpatients (n=109), general practitioner (GP) patients (n=1,059), and inpatients from two hospital samples (n=973, n=599). The UPC-Q was tested for item completeness and ceiling effects, while the UPC-Q scale consisting of the first part of the UPC-Q was tested for internal consistency reliability and construct validity. RESULTS: The percentage of patients rating at least one aspect was 70.6% for psychiatric inpatients, 77.6% for hospital inpatients, and 90.6% for GP patients, while 88.9% of the psychiatric inpatients, 93.1% of the hospital inpatients, and 95.3% of the GP patients were able to prioritize the aspects. The internal consistency reliability of the UPC-Q scale was acceptable in all samples (Cronbach’s alpha >0.7), and construct validity was supported by 20 of 21 significant associations between the UPC-Q and related variables. The UPC-Q total score was skewed toward positive evaluations, but the ceiling effect was smaller for an unbalanced response scale than for a balanced scale. CONCLUSION: The UPC-Q includes ratings of what is most important for individual patients, while at the same time providing data for improving the quality of health care and making it possible to monitor trends within and across patient populations. This study included psychiatric inpatients, hospital inpatients, and GP patients, and found that the UPC-Q performed well in terms of acceptance, internal consistency reliability, and construct validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4902142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49021422016-06-27 The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: reliability and validity of a one-page questionnaire following surveys in three patient populations Bjertnaes, Oyvind Iversen, Hilde Hestad Holmboe, Olaf Danielsen, Kirsten Garratt, Andrew Patient Relat Outcome Meas Original Research BACKGROUND: This study developed and tested the reliability and validity of the Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire (UPC-Q). METHODS: The UPC-Q developed in this study has three parts: 1) the aspects that patients consider the most important when receiving a relevant health care service, rating the health care services on these aspects and their prioritization, 2) the overall experiences of patients using the relevant health care service, and 3) suggestions for improvements. The UPC-Q was tested in four different patient-experience surveys in 2015, including psychiatric inpatients (n=109), general practitioner (GP) patients (n=1,059), and inpatients from two hospital samples (n=973, n=599). The UPC-Q was tested for item completeness and ceiling effects, while the UPC-Q scale consisting of the first part of the UPC-Q was tested for internal consistency reliability and construct validity. RESULTS: The percentage of patients rating at least one aspect was 70.6% for psychiatric inpatients, 77.6% for hospital inpatients, and 90.6% for GP patients, while 88.9% of the psychiatric inpatients, 93.1% of the hospital inpatients, and 95.3% of the GP patients were able to prioritize the aspects. The internal consistency reliability of the UPC-Q scale was acceptable in all samples (Cronbach’s alpha >0.7), and construct validity was supported by 20 of 21 significant associations between the UPC-Q and related variables. The UPC-Q total score was skewed toward positive evaluations, but the ceiling effect was smaller for an unbalanced response scale than for a balanced scale. CONCLUSION: The UPC-Q includes ratings of what is most important for individual patients, while at the same time providing data for improving the quality of health care and making it possible to monitor trends within and across patient populations. This study included psychiatric inpatients, hospital inpatients, and GP patients, and found that the UPC-Q performed well in terms of acceptance, internal consistency reliability, and construct validity. Dove Medical Press 2016-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4902142/ /pubmed/27350761 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S102732 Text en © 2016 Bjertnaes et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bjertnaes, Oyvind
Iversen, Hilde Hestad
Holmboe, Olaf
Danielsen, Kirsten
Garratt, Andrew
The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: reliability and validity of a one-page questionnaire following surveys in three patient populations
title The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: reliability and validity of a one-page questionnaire following surveys in three patient populations
title_full The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: reliability and validity of a one-page questionnaire following surveys in three patient populations
title_fullStr The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: reliability and validity of a one-page questionnaire following surveys in three patient populations
title_full_unstemmed The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: reliability and validity of a one-page questionnaire following surveys in three patient populations
title_short The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: reliability and validity of a one-page questionnaire following surveys in three patient populations
title_sort universal patient centeredness questionnaire: reliability and validity of a one-page questionnaire following surveys in three patient populations
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350761
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S102732
work_keys_str_mv AT bjertnaesoyvind theuniversalpatientcenterednessquestionnairereliabilityandvalidityofaonepagequestionnairefollowingsurveysinthreepatientpopulations
AT iversenhildehestad theuniversalpatientcenterednessquestionnairereliabilityandvalidityofaonepagequestionnairefollowingsurveysinthreepatientpopulations
AT holmboeolaf theuniversalpatientcenterednessquestionnairereliabilityandvalidityofaonepagequestionnairefollowingsurveysinthreepatientpopulations
AT danielsenkirsten theuniversalpatientcenterednessquestionnairereliabilityandvalidityofaonepagequestionnairefollowingsurveysinthreepatientpopulations
AT garrattandrew theuniversalpatientcenterednessquestionnairereliabilityandvalidityofaonepagequestionnairefollowingsurveysinthreepatientpopulations
AT bjertnaesoyvind universalpatientcenterednessquestionnairereliabilityandvalidityofaonepagequestionnairefollowingsurveysinthreepatientpopulations
AT iversenhildehestad universalpatientcenterednessquestionnairereliabilityandvalidityofaonepagequestionnairefollowingsurveysinthreepatientpopulations
AT holmboeolaf universalpatientcenterednessquestionnairereliabilityandvalidityofaonepagequestionnairefollowingsurveysinthreepatientpopulations
AT danielsenkirsten universalpatientcenterednessquestionnairereliabilityandvalidityofaonepagequestionnairefollowingsurveysinthreepatientpopulations
AT garrattandrew universalpatientcenterednessquestionnairereliabilityandvalidityofaonepagequestionnairefollowingsurveysinthreepatientpopulations