Cargando…

Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Cohort Studies of Suicide Risk Assessment among Psychiatric Patients: Heterogeneity in Results and Lack of Improvement over Time

OBJECTIVE: It is widely assumed that the clinical care of psychiatric patients can be guided by estimates of suicide risk and by using patient characteristics to define a group of high-risk patients. However, the statistical strength and reliability of suicide risk categorization is unknown. Our obj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Large, Matthew, Kaneson, Muthusamy, Myles, Nicholas, Myles, Hannah, Gunaratne, Pramudie, Ryan, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27285387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156322
_version_ 1782436950323494912
author Large, Matthew
Kaneson, Muthusamy
Myles, Nicholas
Myles, Hannah
Gunaratne, Pramudie
Ryan, Christopher
author_facet Large, Matthew
Kaneson, Muthusamy
Myles, Nicholas
Myles, Hannah
Gunaratne, Pramudie
Ryan, Christopher
author_sort Large, Matthew
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: It is widely assumed that the clinical care of psychiatric patients can be guided by estimates of suicide risk and by using patient characteristics to define a group of high-risk patients. However, the statistical strength and reliability of suicide risk categorization is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the odds of suicide in high-risk compared to lower-risk categories and the suicide rates in high-risk and lower-risk groups. METHOD: We located longitudinal cohort studies where psychiatric patients or people who had made suicide attempts were stratified into high-risk and lower-risk groups for suicide with suicide mortality as the outcome by searching for peer reviewed publications indexed in PubMed or PsychINFO. Electronic searches were supplemented by hand searching of included studies and relevant review articles. Two authors independently extracted data regarding effect size, study population and study design from 53 samples of risk-assessed patients reported in 37 studies. RESULTS: The pooled odds of suicide among high-risk patients compared to lower-risk patients calculated by random effects meta-analysis was of 4.84 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 3.79–6.20). Between-study heterogeneity was very high (I(2) = 93.3). There was no evidence that more recent studies had greater statistical strength than older studies. Over an average follow up period of 63 months the proportion of suicides among the high-risk patients was 5.5% and was 0.9% among lower-risk patients. The meta-analytically derived sensitivity and specificity of a high-risk categorization were 56% and 79% respectively. There was evidence of publication bias in favour of studies that inflated the pooled odds of suicide in high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of suicide risk categorizations based on the presence of multiple risk factors does not greatly exceed the association between individual suicide risk factors and suicide. A statistically strong and reliable method to usefully distinguish patients with a high-risk of suicide remains elusive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4902221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49022212016-06-24 Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Cohort Studies of Suicide Risk Assessment among Psychiatric Patients: Heterogeneity in Results and Lack of Improvement over Time Large, Matthew Kaneson, Muthusamy Myles, Nicholas Myles, Hannah Gunaratne, Pramudie Ryan, Christopher PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: It is widely assumed that the clinical care of psychiatric patients can be guided by estimates of suicide risk and by using patient characteristics to define a group of high-risk patients. However, the statistical strength and reliability of suicide risk categorization is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the odds of suicide in high-risk compared to lower-risk categories and the suicide rates in high-risk and lower-risk groups. METHOD: We located longitudinal cohort studies where psychiatric patients or people who had made suicide attempts were stratified into high-risk and lower-risk groups for suicide with suicide mortality as the outcome by searching for peer reviewed publications indexed in PubMed or PsychINFO. Electronic searches were supplemented by hand searching of included studies and relevant review articles. Two authors independently extracted data regarding effect size, study population and study design from 53 samples of risk-assessed patients reported in 37 studies. RESULTS: The pooled odds of suicide among high-risk patients compared to lower-risk patients calculated by random effects meta-analysis was of 4.84 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 3.79–6.20). Between-study heterogeneity was very high (I(2) = 93.3). There was no evidence that more recent studies had greater statistical strength than older studies. Over an average follow up period of 63 months the proportion of suicides among the high-risk patients was 5.5% and was 0.9% among lower-risk patients. The meta-analytically derived sensitivity and specificity of a high-risk categorization were 56% and 79% respectively. There was evidence of publication bias in favour of studies that inflated the pooled odds of suicide in high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of suicide risk categorizations based on the presence of multiple risk factors does not greatly exceed the association between individual suicide risk factors and suicide. A statistically strong and reliable method to usefully distinguish patients with a high-risk of suicide remains elusive. Public Library of Science 2016-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4902221/ /pubmed/27285387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156322 Text en © 2016 Large et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Large, Matthew
Kaneson, Muthusamy
Myles, Nicholas
Myles, Hannah
Gunaratne, Pramudie
Ryan, Christopher
Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Cohort Studies of Suicide Risk Assessment among Psychiatric Patients: Heterogeneity in Results and Lack of Improvement over Time
title Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Cohort Studies of Suicide Risk Assessment among Psychiatric Patients: Heterogeneity in Results and Lack of Improvement over Time
title_full Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Cohort Studies of Suicide Risk Assessment among Psychiatric Patients: Heterogeneity in Results and Lack of Improvement over Time
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Cohort Studies of Suicide Risk Assessment among Psychiatric Patients: Heterogeneity in Results and Lack of Improvement over Time
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Cohort Studies of Suicide Risk Assessment among Psychiatric Patients: Heterogeneity in Results and Lack of Improvement over Time
title_short Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Cohort Studies of Suicide Risk Assessment among Psychiatric Patients: Heterogeneity in Results and Lack of Improvement over Time
title_sort meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies of suicide risk assessment among psychiatric patients: heterogeneity in results and lack of improvement over time
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27285387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156322
work_keys_str_mv AT largematthew metaanalysisoflongitudinalcohortstudiesofsuicideriskassessmentamongpsychiatricpatientsheterogeneityinresultsandlackofimprovementovertime
AT kanesonmuthusamy metaanalysisoflongitudinalcohortstudiesofsuicideriskassessmentamongpsychiatricpatientsheterogeneityinresultsandlackofimprovementovertime
AT mylesnicholas metaanalysisoflongitudinalcohortstudiesofsuicideriskassessmentamongpsychiatricpatientsheterogeneityinresultsandlackofimprovementovertime
AT myleshannah metaanalysisoflongitudinalcohortstudiesofsuicideriskassessmentamongpsychiatricpatientsheterogeneityinresultsandlackofimprovementovertime
AT gunaratnepramudie metaanalysisoflongitudinalcohortstudiesofsuicideriskassessmentamongpsychiatricpatientsheterogeneityinresultsandlackofimprovementovertime
AT ryanchristopher metaanalysisoflongitudinalcohortstudiesofsuicideriskassessmentamongpsychiatricpatientsheterogeneityinresultsandlackofimprovementovertime