Cargando…

Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate how perception of weight stigma among underserved women with obesity impacts doctor–patient relationships. METHODS: This study consisted of an interviewer‐administered survey of 149 women with obesity (body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg m(−2)) immediate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrante, J. M., Seaman, K., Bator, A., Ohman‐Strickland, P., Gundersen, D., Clemow, L., Puhl, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.40
_version_ 1782436960283918336
author Ferrante, J. M.
Seaman, K.
Bator, A.
Ohman‐Strickland, P.
Gundersen, D.
Clemow, L.
Puhl, R.
author_facet Ferrante, J. M.
Seaman, K.
Bator, A.
Ohman‐Strickland, P.
Gundersen, D.
Clemow, L.
Puhl, R.
author_sort Ferrante, J. M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate how perception of weight stigma among underserved women with obesity impacts doctor–patient relationships. METHODS: This study consisted of an interviewer‐administered survey of 149 women with obesity (body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg m(−2)) immediately after their physician visit at four Federally Qualified Health Centers. Perceptions of weight stigma and physician empathy were measured using the Stigma Situations in Health Care instrument and Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure, respectively. Associations of CARE and Stigma scores with BMI and patient characteristics were analysed using Mantel–Haenszel chi‐squared test and ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean CARE score was 42.1 (standard deviation 8.4; range 11.0–50.0), and mean stigma score was 4.6 (standard deviation 7.6; range 0–43.0). Each increase in BMI category was associated with almost twofold increased odds of higher perception of stigma (odds ratio, 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.30–2.78, P = 0.001). BMI was not associated with CARE. However, for each increase in stigma category, the odds of lower CARE score doubled (odds ratio, 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.36–0.75, P = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: While BMI was not associated with perception of physician empathy, higher frequency of weight stigmatizing situations was negatively associated with perception of physician empathy. Reducing weight stigma in primary care could improve doctor–patient relationships and quality of care in patients with obesity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4902272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49022722016-06-10 Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships Ferrante, J. M. Seaman, K. Bator, A. Ohman‐Strickland, P. Gundersen, D. Clemow, L. Puhl, R. Obes Sci Pract Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate how perception of weight stigma among underserved women with obesity impacts doctor–patient relationships. METHODS: This study consisted of an interviewer‐administered survey of 149 women with obesity (body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg m(−2)) immediately after their physician visit at four Federally Qualified Health Centers. Perceptions of weight stigma and physician empathy were measured using the Stigma Situations in Health Care instrument and Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure, respectively. Associations of CARE and Stigma scores with BMI and patient characteristics were analysed using Mantel–Haenszel chi‐squared test and ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean CARE score was 42.1 (standard deviation 8.4; range 11.0–50.0), and mean stigma score was 4.6 (standard deviation 7.6; range 0–43.0). Each increase in BMI category was associated with almost twofold increased odds of higher perception of stigma (odds ratio, 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.30–2.78, P = 0.001). BMI was not associated with CARE. However, for each increase in stigma category, the odds of lower CARE score doubled (odds ratio, 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.36–0.75, P = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: While BMI was not associated with perception of physician empathy, higher frequency of weight stigmatizing situations was negatively associated with perception of physician empathy. Reducing weight stigma in primary care could improve doctor–patient relationships and quality of care in patients with obesity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4902272/ /pubmed/27293804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.40 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, World Obesity and The Obesity Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ferrante, J. M.
Seaman, K.
Bator, A.
Ohman‐Strickland, P.
Gundersen, D.
Clemow, L.
Puhl, R.
Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships
title Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships
title_full Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships
title_fullStr Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships
title_full_unstemmed Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships
title_short Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships
title_sort impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.40
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrantejm impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships
AT seamank impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships
AT batora impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships
AT ohmanstricklandp impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships
AT gundersend impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships
AT clemowl impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships
AT puhlr impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships