Cargando…
Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate how perception of weight stigma among underserved women with obesity impacts doctor–patient relationships. METHODS: This study consisted of an interviewer‐administered survey of 149 women with obesity (body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg m(−2)) immediate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.40 |
_version_ | 1782436960283918336 |
---|---|
author | Ferrante, J. M. Seaman, K. Bator, A. Ohman‐Strickland, P. Gundersen, D. Clemow, L. Puhl, R. |
author_facet | Ferrante, J. M. Seaman, K. Bator, A. Ohman‐Strickland, P. Gundersen, D. Clemow, L. Puhl, R. |
author_sort | Ferrante, J. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate how perception of weight stigma among underserved women with obesity impacts doctor–patient relationships. METHODS: This study consisted of an interviewer‐administered survey of 149 women with obesity (body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg m(−2)) immediately after their physician visit at four Federally Qualified Health Centers. Perceptions of weight stigma and physician empathy were measured using the Stigma Situations in Health Care instrument and Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure, respectively. Associations of CARE and Stigma scores with BMI and patient characteristics were analysed using Mantel–Haenszel chi‐squared test and ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean CARE score was 42.1 (standard deviation 8.4; range 11.0–50.0), and mean stigma score was 4.6 (standard deviation 7.6; range 0–43.0). Each increase in BMI category was associated with almost twofold increased odds of higher perception of stigma (odds ratio, 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.30–2.78, P = 0.001). BMI was not associated with CARE. However, for each increase in stigma category, the odds of lower CARE score doubled (odds ratio, 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.36–0.75, P = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: While BMI was not associated with perception of physician empathy, higher frequency of weight stigmatizing situations was negatively associated with perception of physician empathy. Reducing weight stigma in primary care could improve doctor–patient relationships and quality of care in patients with obesity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4902272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49022722016-06-10 Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships Ferrante, J. M. Seaman, K. Bator, A. Ohman‐Strickland, P. Gundersen, D. Clemow, L. Puhl, R. Obes Sci Pract Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate how perception of weight stigma among underserved women with obesity impacts doctor–patient relationships. METHODS: This study consisted of an interviewer‐administered survey of 149 women with obesity (body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg m(−2)) immediately after their physician visit at four Federally Qualified Health Centers. Perceptions of weight stigma and physician empathy were measured using the Stigma Situations in Health Care instrument and Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure, respectively. Associations of CARE and Stigma scores with BMI and patient characteristics were analysed using Mantel–Haenszel chi‐squared test and ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean CARE score was 42.1 (standard deviation 8.4; range 11.0–50.0), and mean stigma score was 4.6 (standard deviation 7.6; range 0–43.0). Each increase in BMI category was associated with almost twofold increased odds of higher perception of stigma (odds ratio, 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.30–2.78, P = 0.001). BMI was not associated with CARE. However, for each increase in stigma category, the odds of lower CARE score doubled (odds ratio, 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.36–0.75, P = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: While BMI was not associated with perception of physician empathy, higher frequency of weight stigmatizing situations was negatively associated with perception of physician empathy. Reducing weight stigma in primary care could improve doctor–patient relationships and quality of care in patients with obesity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4902272/ /pubmed/27293804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.40 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, World Obesity and The Obesity Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ferrante, J. M. Seaman, K. Bator, A. Ohman‐Strickland, P. Gundersen, D. Clemow, L. Puhl, R. Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships |
title | Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships |
title_full | Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships |
title_fullStr | Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships |
title_short | Impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships |
title_sort | impact of perceived weight stigma among underserved women on doctor–patient relationships |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferrantejm impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships AT seamank impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships AT batora impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships AT ohmanstricklandp impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships AT gundersend impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships AT clemowl impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships AT puhlr impactofperceivedweightstigmaamongunderservedwomenondoctorpatientrelationships |