Cargando…

Diagnostic Value of Serum IgG4 for IgG4-Related Disease: A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Many studies about serum IgG4 for the diagnosis of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) have been reported. However, these studies had relatively small sample sizes and the diagnostic accuracy values varied much between them. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Mingju, Liu, Min, Fan, Gaowei, Yang, Xin, Li, Jinming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27227950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003785
_version_ 1782436977504681984
author Hao, Mingju
Liu, Min
Fan, Gaowei
Yang, Xin
Li, Jinming
author_facet Hao, Mingju
Liu, Min
Fan, Gaowei
Yang, Xin
Li, Jinming
author_sort Hao, Mingju
collection PubMed
description Many studies about serum IgG4 for the diagnosis of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) have been reported. However, these studies had relatively small sample sizes and the diagnostic accuracy values varied much between them. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum IgG4 for IgG4-RD. We conducted a search of relevant articles using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases published before December 2015. Studies those assessed the diagnostic accuracy of serum IgG4 for IgG4-RD and those provided the cut-off value for serum IgG4 were included. Data were synthesized using the random-effect model. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA with the MIDAS module and Meta-DiSc 1.4 software. A total of 9 case-control studies were analyzed, which included 1235 patients with IgG4-RD and 5696 overall controls. The pooled estimate, for a cut-off value ranged from 135 to 144 mg/dL, produced a sensitivity of 87.2% (95% CI, 85.2–89.0%) and a specificity of 82.6% (95% CI, 81.6–83.6%). The positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 6.48 (95% CI, 3.98–10.57), 0.14 (95% CI, 0.09–0.21), and 45.15 (95% CI, 23.41–87.06), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was 0.94 (0.92–0.96). When a cut-off value of 2-fold the upper limit of normal was used (ranged from 270 to 280 mg/dL), the pooled sensitivity was 63% (95% CI, 60.0–66.0%), and the specificity was 94.8% (95% CI, 94.1–95.4%). The PLR, NLR, and DOR were 13.3 (95% CI, 7.39–24.0), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.29–0.58) and 33.42 (95% CI, 13.88–80.43), respectively. The AUC of the SROC was 0.92 (0.90–0.94). Only a relatively small number of studies were included, and significant heterogeneity was observed in this meta-analysis. Serum IgG4 is a modestly effective marker to diagnose IgG4-RD. Doubling the cut-off value for IgG4 could not improve the overall test characteristics. A high specificity inevitably accompanies with a significant sacrifice in sensitivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4902374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49023742016-06-23 Diagnostic Value of Serum IgG4 for IgG4-Related Disease: A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Hao, Mingju Liu, Min Fan, Gaowei Yang, Xin Li, Jinming Medicine (Baltimore) 3600 Many studies about serum IgG4 for the diagnosis of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) have been reported. However, these studies had relatively small sample sizes and the diagnostic accuracy values varied much between them. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum IgG4 for IgG4-RD. We conducted a search of relevant articles using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases published before December 2015. Studies those assessed the diagnostic accuracy of serum IgG4 for IgG4-RD and those provided the cut-off value for serum IgG4 were included. Data were synthesized using the random-effect model. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA with the MIDAS module and Meta-DiSc 1.4 software. A total of 9 case-control studies were analyzed, which included 1235 patients with IgG4-RD and 5696 overall controls. The pooled estimate, for a cut-off value ranged from 135 to 144 mg/dL, produced a sensitivity of 87.2% (95% CI, 85.2–89.0%) and a specificity of 82.6% (95% CI, 81.6–83.6%). The positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 6.48 (95% CI, 3.98–10.57), 0.14 (95% CI, 0.09–0.21), and 45.15 (95% CI, 23.41–87.06), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was 0.94 (0.92–0.96). When a cut-off value of 2-fold the upper limit of normal was used (ranged from 270 to 280 mg/dL), the pooled sensitivity was 63% (95% CI, 60.0–66.0%), and the specificity was 94.8% (95% CI, 94.1–95.4%). The PLR, NLR, and DOR were 13.3 (95% CI, 7.39–24.0), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.29–0.58) and 33.42 (95% CI, 13.88–80.43), respectively. The AUC of the SROC was 0.92 (0.90–0.94). Only a relatively small number of studies were included, and significant heterogeneity was observed in this meta-analysis. Serum IgG4 is a modestly effective marker to diagnose IgG4-RD. Doubling the cut-off value for IgG4 could not improve the overall test characteristics. A high specificity inevitably accompanies with a significant sacrifice in sensitivity. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4902374/ /pubmed/27227950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003785 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3600
Hao, Mingju
Liu, Min
Fan, Gaowei
Yang, Xin
Li, Jinming
Diagnostic Value of Serum IgG4 for IgG4-Related Disease: A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Diagnostic Value of Serum IgG4 for IgG4-Related Disease: A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic Value of Serum IgG4 for IgG4-Related Disease: A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of Serum IgG4 for IgG4-Related Disease: A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of Serum IgG4 for IgG4-Related Disease: A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic Value of Serum IgG4 for IgG4-Related Disease: A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic value of serum igg4 for igg4-related disease: a prisma-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 3600
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27227950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003785
work_keys_str_mv AT haomingju diagnosticvalueofserumigg4forigg4relateddiseaseaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liumin diagnosticvalueofserumigg4forigg4relateddiseaseaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fangaowei diagnosticvalueofserumigg4forigg4relateddiseaseaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangxin diagnosticvalueofserumigg4forigg4relateddiseaseaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijinming diagnosticvalueofserumigg4forigg4relateddiseaseaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis