Cargando…
MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy
OBJECTIVES: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablative therapy with a low side-effect profile in prostate cancer. The objective was: 1) To compare the volumetric IRE ablation zone on grey-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26449559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4042-3 |
_version_ | 1782437031285096448 |
---|---|
author | van den Bos, Willemien de Bruin, D. M. van Randen, A. Engelbrecht, M. R. W. Postema, A. W. Muller, B. G. Varkarakis, I. M. Skolarikos, A. Savci-Heijink, C. D. Jurhill, R. R. Zondervan, P. J. Laguna Pes, M. P. Wijkstra, H. de Reijke, T. M. de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H. |
author_facet | van den Bos, Willemien de Bruin, D. M. van Randen, A. Engelbrecht, M. R. W. Postema, A. W. Muller, B. G. Varkarakis, I. M. Skolarikos, A. Savci-Heijink, C. D. Jurhill, R. R. Zondervan, P. J. Laguna Pes, M. P. Wijkstra, H. de Reijke, T. M. de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H. |
author_sort | van den Bos, Willemien |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablative therapy with a low side-effect profile in prostate cancer. The objective was: 1) To compare the volumetric IRE ablation zone on grey-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with histopathology findings; 2) To determine a reliable imaging modality to visualize the IRE ablation effects accurately. METHODS: A prospective phase I-II study was performed in 16 patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP). IRE of the prostate was performed 4 weeks before RP. Prior to, and 4 weeks after the IRE treatment, imaging was performed by TRUS, CEUS, and mpMRI. 3D-analysis of the ablation volumes on imaging and on H&E-stained whole-mount sections was performed. The volumes were compared and the correlation was calculated. RESULTS: Evaluation of the imaging demonstrated that with T2-weighted MRI, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, and CEUS, effects of IRE are visible. T2MRI and CEUS closely match the volumes on histopathology (Pearson correlation r = 0.88 resp. 0.80). However, IRE is not visible with TRUS. CONCLUSIONS: mpMRI and CEUS are appropriate for assessing IRE effects and are the most feasible imaging modalities to visualize IRE ablation zone. The imaging is concordant with results of histopathological examination. KEY POINTS: • mpMRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound are appropriate imaging modalities for assessing IRE effects • mpMRI and CEUS are the most feasible imaging modalities to visualize IRE ablation zone • The imaging is concordant with results of histopathological examination after IRE • Grey-scale US is insufficient for assessing IRE ablations |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4902838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49028382016-06-27 MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy van den Bos, Willemien de Bruin, D. M. van Randen, A. Engelbrecht, M. R. W. Postema, A. W. Muller, B. G. Varkarakis, I. M. Skolarikos, A. Savci-Heijink, C. D. Jurhill, R. R. Zondervan, P. J. Laguna Pes, M. P. Wijkstra, H. de Reijke, T. M. de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H. Eur Radiol Urogenital OBJECTIVES: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablative therapy with a low side-effect profile in prostate cancer. The objective was: 1) To compare the volumetric IRE ablation zone on grey-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with histopathology findings; 2) To determine a reliable imaging modality to visualize the IRE ablation effects accurately. METHODS: A prospective phase I-II study was performed in 16 patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP). IRE of the prostate was performed 4 weeks before RP. Prior to, and 4 weeks after the IRE treatment, imaging was performed by TRUS, CEUS, and mpMRI. 3D-analysis of the ablation volumes on imaging and on H&E-stained whole-mount sections was performed. The volumes were compared and the correlation was calculated. RESULTS: Evaluation of the imaging demonstrated that with T2-weighted MRI, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, and CEUS, effects of IRE are visible. T2MRI and CEUS closely match the volumes on histopathology (Pearson correlation r = 0.88 resp. 0.80). However, IRE is not visible with TRUS. CONCLUSIONS: mpMRI and CEUS are appropriate for assessing IRE effects and are the most feasible imaging modalities to visualize IRE ablation zone. The imaging is concordant with results of histopathological examination. KEY POINTS: • mpMRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound are appropriate imaging modalities for assessing IRE effects • mpMRI and CEUS are the most feasible imaging modalities to visualize IRE ablation zone • The imaging is concordant with results of histopathological examination after IRE • Grey-scale US is insufficient for assessing IRE ablations Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-10-08 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4902838/ /pubmed/26449559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4042-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Urogenital van den Bos, Willemien de Bruin, D. M. van Randen, A. Engelbrecht, M. R. W. Postema, A. W. Muller, B. G. Varkarakis, I. M. Skolarikos, A. Savci-Heijink, C. D. Jurhill, R. R. Zondervan, P. J. Laguna Pes, M. P. Wijkstra, H. de Reijke, T. M. de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H. MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy |
title | MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy |
title_full | MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy |
title_fullStr | MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy |
title_short | MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy |
title_sort | mri and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase i-ii study in patients undergoing ire followed by radical prostatectomy |
topic | Urogenital |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26449559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4042-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenboswillemien mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT debruindm mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT vanrandena mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT engelbrechtmrw mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT postemaaw mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT mullerbg mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT varkarakisim mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT skolarikosa mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT savciheijinkcd mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT jurhillrr mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT zondervanpj mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT lagunapesmp mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT wijkstrah mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT dereijketm mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy AT delarosettejjmch mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy |