Cargando…

MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablative therapy with a low side-effect profile in prostate cancer. The objective was: 1) To compare the volumetric IRE ablation zone on grey-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Bos, Willemien, de Bruin, D. M., van Randen, A., Engelbrecht, M. R. W., Postema, A. W., Muller, B. G., Varkarakis, I. M., Skolarikos, A., Savci-Heijink, C. D., Jurhill, R. R., Zondervan, P. J., Laguna Pes, M. P., Wijkstra, H., de Reijke, T. M., de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26449559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4042-3
_version_ 1782437031285096448
author van den Bos, Willemien
de Bruin, D. M.
van Randen, A.
Engelbrecht, M. R. W.
Postema, A. W.
Muller, B. G.
Varkarakis, I. M.
Skolarikos, A.
Savci-Heijink, C. D.
Jurhill, R. R.
Zondervan, P. J.
Laguna Pes, M. P.
Wijkstra, H.
de Reijke, T. M.
de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H.
author_facet van den Bos, Willemien
de Bruin, D. M.
van Randen, A.
Engelbrecht, M. R. W.
Postema, A. W.
Muller, B. G.
Varkarakis, I. M.
Skolarikos, A.
Savci-Heijink, C. D.
Jurhill, R. R.
Zondervan, P. J.
Laguna Pes, M. P.
Wijkstra, H.
de Reijke, T. M.
de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H.
author_sort van den Bos, Willemien
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablative therapy with a low side-effect profile in prostate cancer. The objective was: 1) To compare the volumetric IRE ablation zone on grey-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with histopathology findings; 2) To determine a reliable imaging modality to visualize the IRE ablation effects accurately. METHODS: A prospective phase I-II study was performed in 16 patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP). IRE of the prostate was performed 4 weeks before RP. Prior to, and 4 weeks after the IRE treatment, imaging was performed by TRUS, CEUS, and mpMRI. 3D-analysis of the ablation volumes on imaging and on H&E-stained whole-mount sections was performed. The volumes were compared and the correlation was calculated. RESULTS: Evaluation of the imaging demonstrated that with T2-weighted MRI, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, and CEUS, effects of IRE are visible. T2MRI and CEUS closely match the volumes on histopathology (Pearson correlation r = 0.88 resp. 0.80). However, IRE is not visible with TRUS. CONCLUSIONS: mpMRI and CEUS are appropriate for assessing IRE effects and are the most feasible imaging modalities to visualize IRE ablation zone. The imaging is concordant with results of histopathological examination. KEY POINTS: • mpMRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound are appropriate imaging modalities for assessing IRE effects • mpMRI and CEUS are the most feasible imaging modalities to visualize IRE ablation zone • The imaging is concordant with results of histopathological examination after IRE • Grey-scale US is insufficient for assessing IRE ablations
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4902838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49028382016-06-27 MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy van den Bos, Willemien de Bruin, D. M. van Randen, A. Engelbrecht, M. R. W. Postema, A. W. Muller, B. G. Varkarakis, I. M. Skolarikos, A. Savci-Heijink, C. D. Jurhill, R. R. Zondervan, P. J. Laguna Pes, M. P. Wijkstra, H. de Reijke, T. M. de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H. Eur Radiol Urogenital OBJECTIVES: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablative therapy with a low side-effect profile in prostate cancer. The objective was: 1) To compare the volumetric IRE ablation zone on grey-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with histopathology findings; 2) To determine a reliable imaging modality to visualize the IRE ablation effects accurately. METHODS: A prospective phase I-II study was performed in 16 patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP). IRE of the prostate was performed 4 weeks before RP. Prior to, and 4 weeks after the IRE treatment, imaging was performed by TRUS, CEUS, and mpMRI. 3D-analysis of the ablation volumes on imaging and on H&E-stained whole-mount sections was performed. The volumes were compared and the correlation was calculated. RESULTS: Evaluation of the imaging demonstrated that with T2-weighted MRI, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, and CEUS, effects of IRE are visible. T2MRI and CEUS closely match the volumes on histopathology (Pearson correlation r = 0.88 resp. 0.80). However, IRE is not visible with TRUS. CONCLUSIONS: mpMRI and CEUS are appropriate for assessing IRE effects and are the most feasible imaging modalities to visualize IRE ablation zone. The imaging is concordant with results of histopathological examination. KEY POINTS: • mpMRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound are appropriate imaging modalities for assessing IRE effects • mpMRI and CEUS are the most feasible imaging modalities to visualize IRE ablation zone • The imaging is concordant with results of histopathological examination after IRE • Grey-scale US is insufficient for assessing IRE ablations Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-10-08 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4902838/ /pubmed/26449559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4042-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Urogenital
van den Bos, Willemien
de Bruin, D. M.
van Randen, A.
Engelbrecht, M. R. W.
Postema, A. W.
Muller, B. G.
Varkarakis, I. M.
Skolarikos, A.
Savci-Heijink, C. D.
Jurhill, R. R.
Zondervan, P. J.
Laguna Pes, M. P.
Wijkstra, H.
de Reijke, T. M.
de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H.
MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy
title MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy
title_full MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy
title_short MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy
title_sort mri and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase i-ii study in patients undergoing ire followed by radical prostatectomy
topic Urogenital
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26449559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4042-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenboswillemien mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT debruindm mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT vanrandena mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT engelbrechtmrw mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT postemaaw mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT mullerbg mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT varkarakisim mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT skolarikosa mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT savciheijinkcd mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT jurhillrr mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT zondervanpj mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT lagunapesmp mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT wijkstrah mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT dereijketm mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy
AT delarosettejjmch mriandcontrastenhancedultrasoundimagingforevaluationoffocalirreversibleelectroporationtreatmentresultsfromaphaseiiistudyinpatientsundergoingirefollowedbyradicalprostatectomy