Cargando…
Assessing urinary flow rate, creatinine, osmolality and other hydration adjustment methods for urinary biomonitoring using NHANES arsenic, iodine, lead and cadmium data
BACKGROUND: There are numerous methods for adjusting measured concentrations of urinary biomarkers for hydration variation. Few studies use objective criteria to quantify the relative performance of these methods. Our aim was to compare the performance of existing methods for adjusting urinary bioma...
Autores principales: | Middleton, Daniel R. S., Watts, Michael J., Lark, R. Murray, Milne, Chris J., Polya, David A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27286873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0152-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Urinary Creatinine and Arsenic Metabolism
por: Gamble, Mary V., et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Reference Intervals of Spot Urine Creatinine-to-Osmolality Ratio as a Surrogate of Urinary Creatinine Excretion Rate
por: Hsu, Shih-Ping, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Is urinary density an adequate predictor of urinary osmolality?
por: Souza, Ana Carolina P, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Biomonitoring California Protocol for Following up on Elevated Levels of Urinary Arsenic
por: Iyer, Shoba, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
A comparative assessment of dilution correction methods for spot urinary analyte concentrations in a UK population exposed to arsenic in drinking water
por: Middleton, Daniel R.S., et al.
Publicado: (2019)